Tag Archives: Cold War

Cold War Repression in Australia Gets Even More Vicious

Photo Above: Shaoquett Moselmane with students and teachers from a Riverwood language school

Condemn the Witch-Hunt of NSW
Upper House MP Shaoquett Moselmane

Cold War Repression in
Australia Gets Even More Vicious

26 June 2020: Today, Cold War repression in Australia dramatically escalated. Around a dozen officers of Australia’s ASIO secret police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) made an hours-long raid on the home of NSW Labor Party upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. The raid was made under the ridiculous claim that “Chinese government agents” had infiltrated his office and were using him as part of a “foreign interference” operation. Moselmane has not been charged and the claims against him are completely fabricated. Moselmane is being witch-hunted because he has had the temerity to praise China’s achievements in poverty alleviation and because he more recently dared to speak positively about China’s successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic and to rightly call out the Australian media for inciting racist attacks on people of Chinese background.

Sources say that today’s terrifying raid took place with Moselmane’s wife and son at home in the residence. The duration of the ASIO/AFP attack went over a period of some 12 to 16 hours. Today’s raids are a despicable attack on democratic rights and a further constriction of the right to progressive dissent in Australia. These raids, made with the assistance of draconian “foreign interference” laws imposed two years ago with bi-partisan support, are designed to intimidate anyone from speaking positively about socialistic China or to advocate socialist solutions to the grave problems faced by the working class masses and oppressed Aboriginal and other non-white communities in Australia.

All trade unionists, supporters of workers rights, defenders of civil liberties and opponents of racism and all genuine leftists must condemn these raids! We must cry: down with the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane!

Outrageously, NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay wasted no time in joining the attack on Moselmane. She has suspended him from the ALP.

The mainstream media and right-wing politicians, with the acquiescence of Moselmane’s Labor colleagues, had been building up towards today’s authoritarian attack. Several weeks ago there was a hysterical witch-hunt against Moselmane that saw him driven from his post as the deputy president of the NSW upper house. Below is the article that we wrote in response to that witch-hunt. Given today’s raid, all the conclusions made in this article are magnified many times over in their urgency.

****************************************************************

6 June 2020: The ruling classes in the capitalist world are rather nervous at how much dissatisfaction there is within their own countries. Working class youth are frustrated that they are likely to only get insecure, casual jobs where they are often arrogantly bullied by their bosses. Lower income people are angry that affordable rental accommodation is so hard to find. After COVID-19 hit, huge numbers of workers are seething that they have lost their jobs after the very company owners who had made fortunes out of their workers’ labour did not hesitate to retrench these workers as soon as there was any drop in business revenue. Now, the brutal police murder of an unarmed black man in America, George Floyd, has ignited explosive anger amongst black people and other people of colour throughout the Western world at the all-sided racist oppression that they endure. In the U.S., there have been huge, sometimes militant, protests with elements of an uprising. Today in Australia, there were massive solidarity protests with America’s Black Lives Matter demonstrations. These marches focused on opposition to the horrific killings of Aboriginal people by racist police and prison guards.

At least until the recent Black Lives Matter protests, mass grievances have not led to a left-wing radicalisation within Western countries. Instead, in Australia for example, the capitalist rulers have to some degree succeeded in shifting mass frustrations into blaming immigration, guest workers, Aboriginal people, Asians, African youth, Muslims, refugees, unemployed people, climate change concerns and militant unions. Yet the capitalist exploiters remain worried that eventually sizable sections of the working class masses will again look to communism as an alternative to their current predicament. Compounding these fears is the reality that while their own economies have barely been treading water since the late noughties global recession, the world’s biggest socialistic country – the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) – relentlessly grows in economic strength, continues to lift her own people out of the poverty of China’s pre-1949 capitalist days and steadily gains greater prestige and diplomatic clout in the former colonial countries of Africa, South America, the Middle East, Asia and the South Pacific. The richer capitalist powers are not only worried that this is “interfering” with their “right” to “freely” super-exploit their former colonies. They are terrified that some of their “own” masses will start to look favourably upon socialistic China and thus conclude that capitalist rule in their own countries needs to be deposed. As a result, across the capitalist world the rulers and their media have been churning out an anti-communist, China-bashing propaganda campaign.

In the U.S. and Australia, this new Cold War campaign has also involved intimidation and even repression. In Australia, this often takes the form of the witch-hunting of any public figure, and increasingly anyone else, who has any contact with social organisations with even the vaguest links to the PRC; or who dares to make any comment praising the PRC. Such witch-hunting has intensified over the last few years and has reached new levels of hysteria since the COVID-19 pandemic struck. The latest victim is NSW Labor upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. Now Moselmane is no communist. He is, after all, a member of the anticommunist, social democratic ALP. However, Moselmane was witch-hunted for pointing out what is demonstrably true: PRC authorities and her people had taken “timely and effective countermeasures” that had “fought and contained” the COVID-19 threat. For having the temerity to state these plain facts, Moselmane was subjected to a shrill campaign of denunciations and insults from the mainstream media, right-wing politicians and leaders of his own Labor Party. Media shock jocks branded Moselmane a “jerk”, “a train wreck”’, “a lunatic”, “a low filthy bludger” and more. They even made despicable slanders about his wife, lying that she has a material interest in him making positive comments about China. Encouraged by all these insults, rednecks and far right idiots made chilling threats against Moselmane on social media. To his credit, however, in the face of all this intimidation and demands that he resign from parliament, Moselmane has thus far refused to “apologise” for saying what he knows to be completely true. As a result, on April 6, he was forced to step down from his position as assistant president of the NSW Legislative Council. Moselmane had been elected to this position, signifying that he was the highest-ranked ALP upper house MP in NSW, less than a year earlier.

A team of Chinese medical experts and Bangladeshi officials take a group photo upon the team’s arrival in Bangladesh. Even as the Peoples Republic of China was still completing her own initial battle against the pandemic, she sent experts with experience in responding to COVID-19 to many other countries in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Southern and Eastern Europe to assist with their struggles against the pandemic.
Fake drug manufacturers may face heavy fines, life imprisonment or death penalty, according to the soft viagra tabs circumstances. purchase cialis online Check This Out It will also help you to improve your performance in bed. Oral: A good position for how to viagra vs generic have intercourse with his female partner. In most of the cases, he is mistaken, as the same as creosote, diesel exhaust, anabolic steroids, sun lamps and chemicals including lead, night shift working and cancer, however overall the night shift djpaulkom.tv generico cialis on line working is considered risky mark.

Pilloried for Telling the Truth

So what did Shaoquett Moselmane exactly say that so infuriated Australia’s ruling class establishment? The campaign against him cranked into high gear after the 30 March issue of the Sydney Morning Herald attacked him for writing on his personal website that China had made an “emphatic” and “decisive” response to the COVID-19 threat. Moselmane pointed out that China needed “tough, unswerving leadership, focused on the mammoth task ahead” in order to contain the virus’ spread. The Labor MP explained that: “For the Peoples Republic of China, President Xi stepped up and provided that leadership. He mustered the resources of the nation and together with the great people of China – fought it and contained it…. The combined phenomenal effort of the state and the people in the fight to contain the virus was breath taking.” Moselmane also contrasted China’s effective response to “the slow, and at times baffling and confused messaging by the Morrison federal government.”

What Moselmane said was simply fact. Despite being the first country in the world to detect the new virus and despite having a rapid spread of the deadly virus in Wuhan before their own scientists or any other country in the world understood the coronavirus or could ascertain just how deadly it was, the PRC so effectively responded to the threat that the proportion of China’s huge population that have died from the virus is significantly lower than Australia’s. Moreover, while Australia is just starting to open up again following stay-at-home measures and now faces the risk of a second-wave, the PRC so effectively suppressed the virus and reduced new cases to such tiny levels that for the last two months her tourist spots, cafes and restaurants have been gradually filling up with people and her streets and public transport networks are again buzzing with lively crowds.

Although Moselmane focuses a fair bit on Xi Jinping’s leadership, we understand that the main factor behind the PRC’s breath taking response to the virus was the country’s socialistic system. It was this system in which public ownership plays the backbone role and in which the economy is controlled by a state under workers rule that enabled the PRC to concentrate resources so effectively for the pandemic response. Thus, the PRC was able to, in a matter of days, both build brand new infectious disease hospitals and to convert other facilities into makeshift hospitals. It was also this people’s control of the economy that enabled the PRC to provide space suit style protective gear for her medical workers and janitors as well as large quantities of urgently needed ventilators, testing kits, infra-red thermometers and masks. Meanwhile, the PRC’s economic system – in which collective ownership and control plays the basic role – has created a more collectivist outlook in the Chinese masses that led them to, on the one hand, be overall more willing to comply with pandemic response restrictions than their counterparts in, say, the U.S. and Australia and, on the other hand, be more motivated to mobilise in grassroots campaigns to conduct pandemic response measures.

Nevertheless, leadership was also a factor in determining how countries responded to the COVID-19 threat. Just as the likes of Scott Morrison, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro, Boris Johnson and Vladimir Putin are shaped by their role at the head of states designed to serve the capitalist big end of town, Xi Jinping’s actions are shaped and, indeed, constrained by his role at the head of a workers state that was created to ensure the interests of working class people. That meant that while the leaders of the capitalist countries put the fate of their stock markets and corporate profits first, China’s president Xi, for all his faults, did put the interests of people first in responding to the virus outbreak. So Moselmane is quite factually correct when he stated that “President Xi stepped up.” Within hours of Chinese scientists confirming that human to human transmission of the virus can occur, Xi made a high profile order on January 20 for Communist Party of China (CPC) committees and governments at all levels to put people’s safety and health as the top priority and take effective measures to curb the spread of the virus. Chinese state media reported on the same day that:

“Xi ordered all-out efforts to treat patients, identify the causes of the virus infection and spread at an earlier date, strengthen monitoring and standardize treatment procedures.

“Xi spoke of the need for the timely release of information and the deepening of international cooperation.”

The PRC acted early. At the time Xi made this announcement, just three people had died of the virus in a country with a population of nearly 1.5 billion people. Overseas countries then reported just a total of four cases, two in Thailand, one in South Korea and one in Japan. Just two days after Xi’s orders were broadcast, Wuhan took the unprecedented step of announcing that from the following morning all public transportation in the city of 11 million people would be suspended, all movement out of the city through airports and railway stations would be temporarily cut off, all large-scale activities were suspended and everyone was ordered to wear masks in public. These and additional decisive measures taken by the PRC in the ensuing days became a template for the social distancing measures that many other countries, albeit often very belatedly, took.

Medical staff in China’s Wuhan celebrate on March 9 after all COVID-19 patients at the temporary hospital that they worked at were cured and discharged from hospital.

At the time that the PRC shut down Wuhan, Australia had not confirmed one single case of the new virus. Yet, by contrast to the PRC’s quick response, it took the Australian government a whole 50 days from the time that the first coronavirus case in this country was detected on January 25 until the first – and rather limited – social distancing measures were implemented on March 15. This despite having already seen how deadly the virus had been in other countries. The only early “measure” that the Morrison government took was to enact a travel ban on non-residents entering from China – which had more to do with encouraging fears of Red China than being a genuine health measure – and then enacting later bans on arrivals from Iran and then South Korea. Yet, even after China had effectively suppressed the virus, the Morrison regime maintained its politically-motivated, China-specific travel ban while for several weeks enabling people from the U.S., Italy, Spain, France, Germany and cruise ships to enter without proper testing and quarantining even after the pandemic had spread like wildfire in those places. As a result, not only was the virus allowed to spread within Australia through infections brought in overwhelmingly from the U.S., Europe and cruise ships but those infected people from these regions were not given the timely diagnosis and treatment that they needed.

Indeed, Moselmane’s comparison of the PRC’s excellent response to the new virus with “the slow, and at times baffling and confused messaging by the Morrison federal government” is actually rather understated. That has not stopped the Morrison government and this country’s top health bureaucrats from endlessly praising themselves. They have only been able to get away with this because the “response” in the likes of Trump’s America, Johnson’s Britain and Bolsonaro’s Brazil have been so frighteningly disastrous and because the mainstream media have done their best to hide and distort the successful response by the PRC and to minimize coverage of the successes of other countries that have taken effective measures to curb the virus spread, like socialistic Vietnam.

Peter Costello’s Sydney Morning Herald Leads the Charge,
Hard-Right Shock Jocks Follow

It is little surprise that it was the Sydney Morning Herald that cast the first stone in the attack against Moslemane. This paper had been targeting Moslemane ever since he made a 2018 speech hailing China’s lifting of 800 million people out of poverty. In that speech, Moselmane spoke of the need for China to gain greater influence in the global media given that this media is currently in the hands of China’s Western opponents. Moslemane pointed out how the Arab world has seen the power of Western propaganda in manipulating the public, leading to death and destruction. Alarmed that a mainstream politician had the audacity to so openly challenge the Cold War drive against the PRC and to so bluntly call out the pernicious role of Western mainstream media, the SMH looked for a way to discredit Moselmane. The best exposé that they could come up with was one seven months ago that in classic Cold War McCarthyist shock-horror fashion “exposed” how a staffer who works one day a week for Moslemane’s office once attended a training course at the Chinese Academy of Governance which the SMH says also “trains senior cadres of the Chinese Communist Party.” Big deal! What are they going to dig up next: that one of Moslemane’s staffers once ate at a Chinese restaurant where a member of the Chinese community, who had once met with a visiting Chinese Communist Party leader, once also ate at?

Led by its fanatically anti-communist Political and International editor, Peter Hartcher, the SMH has, in fact, been spearheading the Cold War fear campaign against socialistic China. It is ably assisted in this by its sister media organisations like Channel 9 and the hard right radio “news” station 2GB, all of which are part of the very same corporation that owns the SMH: Nine Entertainment Limited. The biggest stake in Nine Entertainment is held by filthy rich media mogul Bruce Gordon, with other major shareholdings owned by various wealth management funds and private equity groups. Needless to say, a media organisation owned by ultra-rich capitalists is inevitably going to produce content favourable to the political interests of the capitalist exploiting class and, thus, hostile to socialistic China. And in case anyone falls for the “balanced”, “independent” pretensions of the SMH, it is worth pointing out who the chairman of this corporation that runs it is: none other than the Treasurer in the right wing, former Howard government, Peter Costello!

The SMH journalists working under editor Peter Hartcher delight in buttressing their China-bashing propaganda by “unofficially” quoting as “sources” their mates in ASIO and other sinister Australian spy agencies. Meanwhile, Hartcher works closely in promoting anti-China hostility with Beverley O’Connor’s The World program on the ABC News channel. Peter Costello’s boy, Peter Hartcher, is also a Visiting Fellow at the Lowy Institute, the right-wing think tank that has a major influence in shaping Australian public opinion. Formed and led by Australian billionaire, Frank Lowy, and with a Board of Directors dominated by Lowy and his sons, as well as other capitalists like the chairman of the ANZ bank, the Lowy institute naturally promotes the interests of Australia’s big end of town exploiting class and, thus, is known for aggressively promoting an anti-China and broadly war-mongering agenda.

With the Lowy Institute providing the academic “expertise” and the likes of Peter Hartcher’s SMH and Beverley O’Connor’s The World providing overall political direction and a “centrist”, “liberal” cover, right-wing politicians, the Murdoch media and 2GB shock jocks are then all stocked up to sell the masses the anti-PRC agenda in sensationalist and extremist forms. And so it was with the campaign against Moselmane. In the days following the SMH’s
exposé, the anticommunist uproar against Moselmane that Peter Hartcher and Co. had hoped for duly erupted. Egged on by rabid right-wing presenters Alan Jones and Ray Hadley from 2GB and Peta Credlin from Sky News, extreme right wing politicians queued up to denounce Moselmane. Federal Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton demanded Moselmane’s removal from parliament. NSW leader of the far right One Nation party, Mark Latham, attacked Moselmane’s stance as “disgusting and indefensible.” Credlin and Hadley basically accused Moselmane of treason for simply praising another country’s response to the virus threat and for criticizing the Australian prime minister’s response. The Murdoch print media and the Daily Mail soon joined the witch-hunt too, of course. So too did hardline supporters of Israel’s genocidal oppression of Palestinian people who saw an opportunity to go after an MP known for his sympathy for the Palestinian liberation struggle. Moselmane was born in South Lebanon, the part of the Lebanon that has suffered most from the Israeli regime’s expansionist aggression.

However, it was not just the hard conservatives who went after Moselmane. The most extreme attack on him came from a minister in the former Rudd government, Stephen Conroy. Speaking on Peta Credlin’s Sky News program, Conroy branded Moselmane “an absolute disgrace to the Labor Party,” adding that it is “astonishing he’s still in parliament.” Meanwhile, NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay stabbed her upper house colleague in the back by not only refusing to defend Moselmane from the witch-hunt but, instead, fully joining in. In an interview with 2GB’s Ray Hadley, McKay viciously attacked Moselmane:

“I can assure you… he will never be in the shadow cabinet….

“His actions have been appalling, I can’t say that to you enough.”

Moselmane’s factional ally in the ALP, shadow minister for transport and corrections, Chris Minns, and Labor shadow treasurer, Walt Secord, also both joined in the attacks, respectively branding Moselmane’s comments as “inappropriate” and “extremely stupid.”

Top Scientists and Public Health Officials
Sing the Same Tune as Moselmane on China’s Response

The way that the “centrist” SMH set up Moselmane to be savaged by the Hard Right can be compared to that of the villain in an action movie who inflicts a wound on a captive and then leaves them to bleed in shark-infested waters knowing that the victim’s blood will attract killer sharks. While their sharks did their expected savaging, the SMH pretended to be serious in their coverage. To try and give authority to their attacks on Moselmane, they claimed that, “China has been widely criticised by academics and health experts for downplaying the extent of the outbreak in Wuhan.” Of course, academics and health experts are like everyone else subject to political influences. Being a middle class layer, scientists, doctors and top level academics, like other middle class layers in these reactionary times, can be quite conservative and many identify their interests with those of the ruling capitalist class. Thus, mainstream media seeking to attack Red China would no doubt always be able to find a few health experts willing to sing the tune that they would like to see amplified. Yet many serious scientists are driven by dedication to their work and to their areas of research. As a result, contrary to the misleading assertions of the SMH, the truth is that, in the face of anticommunist pressure, the majority of top Western infectious disease scientists and public health specialists have actually praised China’s response to the virus outbreak. On 19 February, 27 eminent scientists, academics, infectious disease specialists and public health officials from the U.S., Britain, Australia, Germany, The Netherlands and other regions published a “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19” in the prestigious, peer-reviewed British medical journal, The Lancet [1]. The statement lauded China’s efforts to suppress the COVID-19 threat:

“We have watched as the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable.”

This, too, was the finding of a WHO investigation into China’s response to COVID-19 led by Canadian epidemiologist, Bruce Aylward, and consisting of 25 international experts from the U.S., Germany, Japan, Singapore, Nigeria, China, South Korea and Russia. The report by the investigative mission found that [2]:

“In the face of a previously unknown virus, China has rolled out perhaps the most ambitious, agile and aggressive disease containment effort in history.

“Achieving China’s exceptional coverage with and adherence to these containment measures has only been possible due to the deep commitment of the Chinese people to collective action in the face of this common threat. At a community level this is reflected in the remarkable solidarity of provinces and cities in support of the most vulnerable populations and communities. Despite ongoing outbreaks in their own areas, Governors and Mayors have continued to send thousands of health care workers and tons of vital PPE supplies into Hubei province and Wuhan city.”

Indeed, in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, ABC News reporters were constantly disappointed as they posed leading questions to infectious disease specialists inviting them to attack China’s response only for the experts to respond with praise for China’s pandemic suppression efforts. Thus, the Australian government-funded broadcaster was forced to hop from interviewing one medical expert to the next in search of someone who would feed into their Cold War agenda. Yet the Australian government’s own top health bureaucrats also lauded China’s efforts. And let’s note that these are highly-paid government bureaucrats who have worked closely with the right wing Morrison government and have supported most of the Liberal government’s pandemic response strategies – including its initial politically-directed travel bans specifically focused on – and restricted to – the Australian regime’s adversaries. So they are hardly communist sympathizers! Yet, in a media conference on January 30 alongside health minister Greg Hunt, Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Professor Paul Kelly, responded to a journalist’s question about whether Australia’s case numbers would stay at the then low level by saying [3]:

“It depends a lot on what happens in relation to China getting this under control, and they are doing a marvellous job at the moment and it’s a very different approach to what we experienced with SARS some years ago.”

Australia’s chief medical officer, Brendan Murphy, also hailed China’s efforts to stem the virus spread in an interview the following day [4]:

“Clearly, it is not yet contained in China. But they are making Herculean efforts to do so.”

Of course, Australia’s capitalist media ensured that the live interviews where these comments were made were the first and last time that these statements were aired. And they sure weren’t going to report on these comments praising China from Australia’s top public health officials! Yet it was not just senior public health officials and infectious disease specialists who were saying the same things that Moselmane would later say about China’s response to the coronavirus. None other than U.S. president, Donald Trump, the person who has most viciously been trying to blame China for the pandemic over the last few weeks and the man who is the talisman of the extreme right-wing shock jobs who savagely attacked Moselmane, heaped praise on China in the early days of the coronavirus outbreak. Thus, in a tweet on January 24, Trump said [5]:

China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!

So why did Trump praise China and President Xi’s response to the coronavirus in late January and why was Moselmane witch-hunted for giving similar credit to China and Xi just two months later? Well, when Trump was commending China’s response, not only he but nearly the entire capitalist ruling classes in the U.S., Europe and Australia believed their own propaganda that their social system was superior to China’s and, thus, they would be little affected by the virus then ravaging China. They expected that the damage caused by the coronavirus in China would hurt her prestige, undermine the credibility of her socialist system and weaken her economy. Trump believed that he would be facing a weakened PRC opponent in political conflicts and trade disputes and it would, therefore, pay him to sound magnanimous. Two months later the reality turned out very different. The virus caused far more death and economic damage per capita to the U.S., Britain, France, Germany and Australia than it did to China. China, on the other hand, had been able to suppress the virus spread so effectively that she was now giving huge amounts of aid to developing countries to assist them with their pandemic response. This infuriated the rulers of imperialist countries like the U.S. and Australia. For it reinforced a trend where China’s mutually beneficial relations with countries in the South Pacific, Asia, Africa, South and Central America, and the Middle East was enabling these countries to eke out some greater independence from the plundering Western powers. Moreover, far from showing the relative weaknesses in the PRC’s system, the much more successful response of China to the virus threat in comparison with the capitalist countries has shown the superiority of her socialistic system. As far as the capitalist elite in the West are concerned, for anyone to point this out is taboo. For one it would make it harder to sell to their own masses their Cold War drive to “contain” and strangle socialistic rule in China. Furthermore, for anyone to highlight China’s superior response to the pandemic touches off the greatest of all fears of the rulers of Australia and other capitalist countries: that the masses in their own countries will draw the conclusion from this that they need to get rid of the capitalist system and bring socialism to their own countries. Thus, by late March, for Shaoquett Moselmane or any other high-profile person to praise China’s response to the pandemic simply became intolerable for the capitalist ruling classes. Just as significantly, those who sought to score political points against China over the pandemic hoped that by late March, the population would have forgotten all the praise heaped upon China’s response two months earlier by scientists, Australia’s top public health officials and, of all people, Donald Trump.

Some of the medical experts who, in the early days of the pandemic, praised China’s response to the coronavirus. Left: Australia’s then Deputy Chief Medical Officer (now Acting Chief Medical Officer) Paul Kelly. On January 30, he responded to a question about Australia’s future case numbers by saying that, “it depends a lot on what happens in relation to China getting this under control, and they are doing a marvellous job at the moment ….” Centre: Australia’s then Chief Medical Officer, Brendan Murphy. On January 31, Murphy stated in an interview about the epidemic that, “clearly, it is not yet contained in China. But they are making Herculean efforts to do so.” Right: Canadian epidemiologist, Bruce Aylward, who led a team of 25 international experts in a WHO investigation into China’s response to COVID-19. In a 24 February 2020 press conference reporting on the mission, Aylward informed that: “In the face of a previously unknown disease, China has taken one of the most ancient approaches for infectious disease control and rolled out probably the most ambitious, and I would say, agile and aggressive disease containment efforts in history. China took old-fashioned measures, like the national approach to hand-washing, the mask-wearing, the social distancing, the universal temperature monitoring. But then very quickly, as it started to evolve, the response started to change. And it moved from this sort of one-size-fits-all approach to a science-and-risk-based approach, which was really tailored to allow it to use different containment approaches and measures, depending on the context, the capacity and really the nature of the coronavirus circulation…. they took this old approach and then turbo-charged it with modern science and modern technology in a way that was unimaginable even a few years ago…. What they’ve done has only been possible because of tremendous collective commitment and will of the Chinese people from the most bottom-level community leaders we met and talked to, to the governors at the top. It was an extraordinary, what we call all-of-government, all-of-society approach ….” However, as Moselmane found out, by late March, once it became clear just how poorly the capitalist countries had responded to the pandemic compared to China, any doctor, politician or other public figure praising China’s response was likely to be demonised and pilloried by Western ruling classes and their media hounds.

 “Revelations” of Moselmane’s Calling Out of White Australia Racism
Takes Witch-Hunt to White Heat

A week after their original exposé of Moselmane’s statements lauding China’s effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the SMH had a new revelation. They reported that in a February 5 opinion piece for the East China Normal University, Moselmane had attacked the Australian mainstream media for having “publicly played racist cards, offending and insulting many Australian citizens, especially Chinese residents” in actions that “further deepened the already great suffering of the victim.”

“Today, the obsolete scum of ‘white Australia’ is once again flooding, and the theory of yellow fever has once again surfaced,” Moselmane wrote.

“Some mainstream media have bred and spread these racial viruses in our multicultural community with the purpose of inciting hatred.

“Today, media xenophobia and full-scale war against China have become the norm.”

Again Moselmane’s statements are a rather accurate description of what is happening on the ground. One has to be blind to reality or in complete denial to not know that Chinese and other East Asian background people in Australia have been subjected to numerous horrific racist attacks by “the obsolete scum of ‘white Australia’” over the last few months. People of Chinese appearance have been bashed in the streets, at supermarkets and on public transport. They have had threatening racist graffiti scrawled on their homes, had rocks thrown through their house and shop windows, been verbally abused, spat and coughed on and been ordered out of shops and other public places [6] [7] [8]. Racist scum have even abused nurses, doctors and other essential service workers (like bus drivers) of East Asian background and in some cases stalked them in a threatening manner [9] [10] [11]. It is therefore very understandable – and indeed completely necessary – that China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism last night issued an urgent alert warning Chinese tourists not to travel to Australia. The alert correctly informed that “racial discrimination and acts of violence against Chinese and Asians in Australia have increased significantly.”

Resist the Despicable Racist Attacks against Ethnic Chinese People!

Horrific racist graffiti and death threat sprayed on the home of a Chinese-Australian family in the Melbourne suburb of Knoxfield. On another night, racist scum also threw a large rock smashing the family home’s window. As Moselmane correctly pointed out, some mainstream media have incited racial hatred by breeding and spreading racial viruses.

It is undoubtedly true that the attacks on Chinese and other Asian people have been fueled by the mainstream media and by the anti-China rants of the likes of Peter Dutton, Pauline Hanson, far right Coalition MPs George Christensen and Andrew Hastie (both of whom have previously spoken at racist rallies infested by Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists and anti-Semites) and rabid anti-PRC Labor MP, Anthony Byrne. This is proven by the fact that many of those committing racist attacks on the streets have done so while repeating the same anti-Chinese and anti-China diatribes as the right wing shock jocks and the rabid anti-China politicians [12] [13] [14].

Yet it is not only the most rabidly anti-China politicians and the most openly racist-inciting media presenters that bear responsibility for the renewed escalation of racist attacks on Asian background people over the last few months. The more “moderate” politicians in the Liberal Party and the ALP, who largely all support the Cold War drive against the PRC, and the “centrist”, liberal media who promote hostility to Red China, like the SMH and the ABC, are also guilty of breeding and spreading racial viruses. There have always been broadly two types of white supremacists in Australia. The first type are the openly rabid ones that can scarcely hide their hostility to all non-white skinned people. The second type are the more disguised types. They claim to be, or even consider themselves, non-racist and describe themselves as “centre-right”, “liberal” or even “progressive.” Many of them even like to make themselves feel good by expressing sympathy for people of colour when the latter are victims of racism. Yet, when a non-white people organise themselves into a militant anti-racist resistance force or into a powerful country, like the PRC, that challenges Western domination of the world then they think that this is absolutely unacceptable and you see all their latent prejudice oozing out. The “liberal” and “centrist” Australian media and the mainstream Australian politicians are of this second type of white supremacist. Of course, the mainstream media and politicians attacking China are not simply driven by racism. An even bigger factor is their hostility to socialistic states. Yet ever since the 1949 Chinese Revolution brought the toiling masses to power, hostility to China in the U.S. and Australia has combined anti-communist Red Peril fears with racist Yellow Peril xenophobia.

ABC and SMH journalists nevertheless insist that being anti-PRC does not mean that one is anti-Chinese. They are fond of claiming the authority of “experts” to push their Cold War agenda against the PRC. Yet many of the world’s leading scientists have drawn a direct link between the recent political attacks on China over the coronavirus and the racist attacks on Chinese people on the streets. Thus, a strongly worded editorial titled, “Stop the coronavirus stigma now” in the 7 April issue of the British scientific journal, Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, stated [15]:

“US President Donald Trump has repeatedly associated the virus with China. Brazilian lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro — the son of President Jair Bolsonaro — has called it `China’s fault’. Politicians elsewhere, including in the United Kingdom, are also saying that China bears responsibility.

“Continuing to associate a virus and the disease it causes with a specific place is irresponsible and needs to stop….

“Failing to do so has consequences. It’s clear that since the outbreak was first reported, people of Asian descent around the world have been subjected to racist attacks, with untold human costs — for example, on their health and livelihoods.”

Scott Morrison, Anthony Albanese and the “centrist”/liberal SMH and ABC have been just as guilty as Trump, Bolsonaro and many British politicians in promoting the “China’s fault” theory. They are, thus, just as guilty for inciting racist attacks on people of Asian descent. Of course these politicians and journalists would react with outraged denial if they were confronted with this truth. Yet they know full well that when they incite hostility to socialistic China they are doing it in a way that appeals to – and hence breeds – Yellow Peril racist fears. Afterwards they rub their sullied hands thoroughly with liberal doses of hand sanitiser and then, with all the “honesty” of Donald Trump, smugly express “shock” and “anger” when the rabid rednecks that they have just incited carry out racist attacks. But let us not be fooled by the “moderate” pretensions of the likes of SMH’s Peter Hartcher or the ABC’s Beverley O’Connor. Alongside their shock jock counterparts, the ruling class Australian politicians and the inherently divisive, dog-eat-dog nature of the capitalist system, these liberal media commentators share much responsibility for the terrifying rise in racist attacks on people of Chinese appearance over the last few months. Individually each of them may be personally responsible for just one or two percent of the racist attacks that have taken place. Yet given that there have been literally thousands of such attacks (most racist assaults and verbal threats are never reported but one Asian-Australian site collected details of over 300 separate attacks in just 5 weeks), each anti-China journalist or politician can be personally blamed for causing many individual attacks that would not have occurred had they not made their own contribution to the total dose of Red Peril and Yellow Peril hysteria. Put another way, several racist attacks would not have taken place had, say Peter Hartcher, not added to the incessant anti-PRC, “China is to blame” propaganda. We should keep this in mind when determining the methods by which we must resist these filthy, anti-China scum in the mainstream media.

Left: Political editor of The Sydney Morning Herald, Peter Hartcher, speaks at a forum of the right wing think tank, The Sydney Institute. With his fanatical anti-communist attacks on Red China, Hartcher has done as much as anyone in the media to incite anti-Asian violence in Australia. Right: One example of the result of the “blame China for the pandemic” propaganda spewed by the likes of Hartcher, the Murdoch media, 2GB and the Australian government and ALP “opposition”. One of the two white racist rednecks, screaming that Asians brought “corona here,” in the process of abusing, kicking and spitting on two Asian sisters in the Sydney suburb of Marrickville on 30 March 2020. Of course, the oh-so-“respectable” “centrist”, Hartcher, claims that he is only attacking the Communist Party of China and actually “abhors” racist violence. However, the truth is that he and his ilk know full well that when they incite hostility to socialistic China they are doing it in a manner that harnesses – and hence encourages – Yellow Peril racist prejudices.

Yet when Moselmane exposed media xenophobia against China and how Australia’s mainstream media “have publicly played racist cards”, he put his finger on a really raw, infected wound. Although capitalist rule in Australia has created one of the most racist societies on the planet, the ruling class insists on denying this. One reason is that they are well aware that their rule over this land was established through genocidal dispossession of this country’s first peoples, the Aboriginal people. They know that this truth is recalled whenever people like Moslemane, regardless of the context, speak too starkly about the reality of racism in Australia. They know that recalling this truth in turn damages the “legitimacy” of the Australian nationalist myths that they so depend on to bind the working class masses that they exploit to their self-seeking, ruling class agenda. Secondly, unlike their Western European counterparts, the immediate overseas neighbours of Australia’s ruling class are hundreds and hundreds of millions of non-white skinned peoples in the Pacific and Asia. These are the people that Australia’s imperialist rulers need for both trade and for labour to be exploited by Australian-owned multinational corporations. Any exposure of racist xenophobia within Australia damages the corporate elite’s lucrative business operations in the Asia-Pacific and their imperialist meddling in this region. For these reasons, the ruling class considers it almost as much an act of “treason” for a mainstream politician to bluntly call out White Australia racism as it is for a politician to make comments favourable to the PRC workers state. So when Moselmane’s comments attacking the mainstream media’s role in inciting racial hatred were publicised, the witch-hunt against him reached white heat. Within hours, Moslemane was forced to step down from his position as deputy president of the NSW upper house. He remains a seated member of the upper house.

The Years-Long Re-Emergence of Cold War McCarthyism

Today’s anti-China witch-hunt is, if anything, even broader in who it targets than the 1950s McCarthyist witch-hunt in the U.S. and Australia against anyone suspected of pro-communist sympathies. One does not even have to be branded a communist to be attacked today, as Moselmane found out. One has only to be a public figure who says anything positive about socialistic China. Two and a half years ago, former Labor federal senator Sam Dastyari was driven out of parliament following a 17 month-long witch-hunt for simply once saying that the South China Sea issue is an internal issue for China. However, whereas Moselmane has, to date, courageously stood by his factually correct statements applauding China’s pandemic response success, Dastyari apologised for saying what is true about the South China Sea issue and today cravenly condemns his past actions as he seeks to climb his way back into the political establishment. Yet Dastyari’s apologies at the time were not enough to stop the rabid anti-communists from howling him out of his senate seat.

Last year, there was an even more bizarre witch-hunt. The target, Gladys Liu, a Hong Kong Chinese woman is someone who is not only not a communist but actually a member of the conservative Liberal-National federal government; and a person with some pretty reprehensible right wing views to boot. Liu’s supposed “crime” is that she had once been a member of Chinese community organisations in Australia which apparently have members who are also members of other organisations that have loose ties to the Communist Party of China. For this she was viciously attacked by the media and by the ALP – the very same party that stabbed Moselmane in the back. Indeed ,the witch-hunt became so intense that members of the right wing, rabidly anti-communist Morrison government, eager to preserve their thin parliamentary majority, were able to correctly brand the ALP’s attacks on Liu as being racially-motivated and even McCarthyist.

In this stultifying anti-PRC atmosphere it is hardly just politicians who are being targeted. The capitalist media and politicians have been attacking any Chinese social organisation perceived as being sympathetic to the PRC or, otherwise, including members who are fond of Red China. In reality this means that just about any community organisation consisting of immigrants from mainland China could be targeted since the majority of migrants from mainland China are sympathetic to the PRC. 

Last year, Cold War witch-hunting increasingly targeted international students from the PRC. Especially attacked were those Chinese students who dared to express their sympathies for Red China, especially in regards to the Hong Kong events. These brave students were slandered by the mainstream media. Rabidly anti-communist academics even called for those international students that too strongly promote solidarity with China to face academic disciplinary proceedings. Then, last spring, in a move squarely aimed at silencing through repression the voice of pro-Red China international students, the Australian government announced the creation of a new taskforce to look into “foreign interference” on Australian campuses.

What do all these attacks on Australian-Chinese community organisations, pro-Red China international students and the likes of Moselmane say about the supposed “right to free speech in Australia”? Actually, attacks on dissent and whistleblowers in Australia extend beyond the persecution of those accused of being soft on socialistic China. Today, a former Australian spy, known only as “Witness K,” is facing imprisonment for having revealed that Australia had planted huge numbers of listening devices in East Timorese government buildings in order to give the Australian government the advantage in a dispute with East Timor over gas resources [16]. The Australian regime is also prosecuting Witness K’s lawyer, Bernard Collaery, and two weeks ago Collaery faced a sinister, secret pre-trial hearing [17]. Yet another whistleblower that the Australian regime is persecuting is former military lawyer, David McBride [18]. McBride faces up to 50 years in prison for leaking to the ABC details of horrific war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan – including the murder of unarmed civilians and children. Last June, the Australian Federal Police even raided the offices of the tame, government-funded media channel, the ABC, simply because the ABC had publicised the information from McBride [19]. It is clear that the “right to free-speech” in Australia exists in name only!

Ironically, the extreme right wing media commentators who attacked Moselmane most savagely claim to be the most strident defenders of “free speech,” especially whenever the Racial Discrimination Act is brought up. Yet the “free speech” that these people want is only the “freedom” to vilify Aboriginal people, Africans, Muslims, Asians, LGBTI communities and women’s rights activists. They want the “freedom” to incite racist riots the way that Alan Jones incited the horrific December 2005 white supremacist riot at Cronulla Beach. At the same time these shock jocks want to completely silence anyone who dares to say anything positive about socialistic China.

The truth is that the “right to free speech” in Australia has become more like the “right” to say what is tolerable to the capitalist ruling class. True, theoretically one can say what one wants… as long as one is not a whistle blower! And for people whose voice is not heard by too many people, this right can even sometimes exist in practice. But for people with a high enough profile that their voice will be heard by many, anything that they say that cuts against the exploiting class’ interests too sharply – for example, by praising socialistic China or calling out White Australia racism too bluntly – will see them vilified, threatened, hounded and ultimately driven out of their positions. Look at the way that not only Moslemane has been witch hunted but the way that Sudanese Australian media presenter, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, was abused and hounded out of this country three years ago after she made an ANZAC Day post linking the phrase “Lest we forget” to the horrific oppression of refugees in Australian detention camps at Nauru and Manus and to the brutal oppression of Palestinian people.

In many ways, the “right to free speech” in this country exists in much the same way as “democratic rights for all” does. Theoretically, everyone has an equal vote and say in “democratic Australia.” Yet in practice, under this country’s capitalist system, it is the ultra-rich big business owners who are able to mould “public opinion” and control society through their ownership of the media, through their ability to disproportionately fund political parties, pay for political advertising, finance think tanks and hire lobbyists and through their numerous ties to the upper echelons of all key state and bureaucratic institutions. And whenever their domination meets a significant challenge, they don’t hesitate to throw out any coverings of “democracy” and rely on naked state repression. This is just like how their American capitalist counterparts are today unleashing riot cops and the National Guards to viciously attack those taking part in the ongoing anti-racist resistance there.

At the same time, in a society where workers are exploited and Aboriginal people, ethnic minorities, women and LGBTI communities face such oppression, it is vital that we defend whatever limited democratic rights that we do actually have. For it is the working class masses united with all the downtrodden that is the only force that can fight against exploitation and oppression in this country. That is why it is high time that we confront the growing McCarthyist madness and rebuff the attacks on basic democratic rights. Let us say: Down with the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane! No to the targeting of Australian-Chinese community organisations! Stop the persecution of pro-PRC Chinese international students! The right to free speech must include the right to praise – and indeed support – socialistic countries like the PRC! Drop all charges against whistle blowers David McBride, Witness K and Bernard Collaery!

Racism and Anti-PRC Witch-hunting

As with almost everything else that is negative in Australian society, anti-Red China witch-hunting feeds off and accentuates White Australia racism: that very same racial virus infecting Australia that Moselmane dared to identify. So how did this racial virus spread? For starters, one should understand that the disease of racism is actually widespread within most capitalist societies. Exploiting classes breed racism to divide multiracial working classes. They also inflame racism in order to divert mass frustrations onto racial minorities and, thus, away from the capitalist rulers themselves. Moreover, in imperialist countries like Australia, a racial superiority mentality is transmitted in order to enlist the population behind ruling class acts of military intervention, plunder and paternalism in the poorer “Third World” countries. In Australia there is also a big additional factor spawning racism. That is the fact that capitalist rule here was founded on the genocidal dispossession of this country’s indigenous first peoples, a crime that could only be organised and “justified” by spreading the most extreme form of white supremacist prejudice imaginable.

Today, it is telling that the three politicians who have been most intensely witch-hunted in recent times for supposedly being soft on China – Shaoquett Moselmane, Gladys Liu and Sam Dastyari – are all among the very few politicians in this country from people of colour backgrounds. People who are not white simply have less leeway in this racist society. While hardcore white supremacists are opposed to all people of colour all the time, the more insidious, mainstream form of white supremacy embraced by the bulk of the ruling elite sees non-white people as acceptable until they do something which is deemed “wrong”, in which case all the prejudice gushes out and they will be attacked far more severely than a white person doing the same thing. Yassmin Abdel-Magied certainly copped that when she was cruelly driven out of the country in a barely disguised, racist and misogynist witch-hunt.

All this shows the limits of “multiculturalism” as it is practiced by the ruling class. In their warped version, people from non-Anglo backgrounds are free to practice their own cultures as long as they all accept Western domination of the world and the current social order in Australia where the capitalist big end of town rules and Aboriginal people remain dispossessed. Any non-white person who does, or even says, anything even slightly contradicting this status quo is deemed disloyal and “ungrateful.” We let you into the country so the least you could do is to… such is the attitude of ruling class-created “public opinion” towards people of colour who dare question, in even the most minimal way, the myths of the current social order. All the while this mainstream still claims to stand by “multiculturalism.” This shows that, in practice, the official form of Australian “multiculturalism” sees people of colour confined to a second class status. It is far, far from a genuinely egalitarian and anti-racist multi-racialism.

The same implicit, underlying racism that added to the severity of the campaign against Moslemane has also been evident in a vicious campaign against WHO leader Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, again for having the temerity to praise China’s effective response to the coronavirus outbreak. Dr Ghebreyesus, a microbiologist of Ethiopian background, is the first WHO chief from Africa. As far as unashamed racists are concerned, Africans are not meant to hold such senior positions in international organisations. More liberal, mainstream racists could tolerate Dr Ghebreyesus in this role as long as he did not do anything that contradicted Western imperialist agendas. When Dr Ghebreyesus simply stated the facts by praising the PRC’s response to the virus, all the underlying racism gushed out and he was subjected to incredible abuse and death threats. Although the WHO is an agency under the imperialist dominated UN, Dr Ghebreyesus has shown considerable courage to stand up to racism and colonialist attitudes. When two of France’s most senior doctors despicably called on national TV for testing COVID-19 treatments on Africans [20], Dr Ghebreyesus rightly slammed the remarks as “racist” and a “hangover from a colonial mentality” [21]. Just like when it was revealed that Moselmane had called out White Australia racism, Dr Ghebreyesus’ strong stand against racism only intensified the attacks against him. Yet he stood firm against these racist attacks too and called them out:

“I can tell you personal attacks that have been going on for more than two, three months. Abuses, or racist comments, giving me names, black or Negro. I’m proud of being black, proud of being Negro.

“I don’t care, to be honest … even death threats. I don’t give a damn.

Dr Ghebreyesus also called out that many of the attacks had been associated with supporters of Donald Trump’s favourite regime, Taiwan [22]:

“Three months ago, this attack came from Taiwan. We need to be honest. I will be straight today. From Taiwan.

“And Taiwan, the Foreign Ministry also, they know the campaign. They didn’t disassociate themselves. They even started criticizing me in the middle of all that insult and slur, but I didn’t care.”

Angered by all the attacks on Dr Ghebreyesus, the African Union came to his defence [23]. A statement released by the African Union on the very same day that Dr Ghebreyesus called out Taiwanese racism, emphasised that:

“… the Chairperson of the African Union and President of the Republic of South Africa, HE Cyril Ramaphosa reaffirms his appreciation for the exceptional leadership of the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, from the very earliest stages of this unprecedented global health crisis.

 “The African Union has also commended the management of Dr Tedros in leading the global response to the pandemic.”

As an aside, we must note that it should be little surprise that many of the racist attacks on Dr Ghebreyesus should come from supporters of the Taiwanese regime, with the implicit support of the regime itself. Taiwan was created as a de facto state when leaders of the right-wing former Kuomintang regime and members of the deposed landlord-capitalist exploiting class of China fled that country’s 1949 anti-capitalist revolution and set up base in Taiwan. Since then, the Taiwanese regime has been a stalwart of support for reactionary causes. Taiwan was one of the strongest supporters of the former Apartheid regime in South Africa. Backing the Apartheid regime against those fighting for black liberation, Taiwanese ambassador to Apartheid South Africa, H. K. Yang, stated that: “South Africa and my country are joined in the fight against communism. We are in favour of free enterprise, democracy and freedom” [24]. Taiwan, the former Apartheid rulers of South Africa and the murderously racist Israeli regime established a triangular axis of collaboration on developing nuclear weapons [25]. Taiwan was instrumental in enabling the former Apartheid regime to acquire nuclear weapons.

Cold War Witch-hunting Will Lead to
Greater Repression of All Progressive Forces

The Australian ruling class has already harnessed its drive against those accused of being “soft” on Red China to power its push to constrict the rights of broader sections of society. Thus, two years ago, under the cover of contrived fears about “Chinese interference” and the supposed “threat” posed by the activities of pro-PRC members of Australia’s Chinese community, the Liberal government, with ALP support, rammed through two new laws targeting “foreign interference” that will provide pretexts for Australian regime crackdowns on protest movements and media reporting. Then, in the midst of the Australian ruling class spearheading outrageous attacks on China over the virus outbreak, last month Peter Dutton introduced into parliament the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020. The proposed new laws will give the regime the “right” to prevent a person under ASIO investigation from contacting their lawyer, allow ASIO to expel an interrogated person’s lawyer if they deem the lawyer to be “interrupting questioning”, gives ASIO the power to question 14 year-old children and grants them the “right” to track people without the need for a warrant [26].

The Australian regime’s drive against Red China and those deemed to be sympathetic to her at home has fuelled a “national security” obsession that has in turn made it easier for the Australian regime to target dissenters who have no direct connection with Cold War issues. It is telling that although those who blew the whistle on the Australian state’s spying in East Timor were first raided in 2013, the Australian regime did not feel that it could get away with actually laying charges on the two whistle blowers – Witness K and Bernard Collaery – until a whole five years later. Although the anti-China crusade and the suppression of those exposing the crimes of the Australian regime in East Timor are not directly connected, it is undoubted that the “national security” fixation created by the escalation of anti-PRC witch-hunting over the last few years made the government feel more confident to pursue the prosecution of whistle blowers in 2018 than they did in 2013. It is notable too that the very same Peter Dutton who demanded Moselmane’s removal from parliament was just weeks later demanding the sacking of Victoria’s Deputy Chief Health Officer, Dr Annaliese van Diemen, for merely making a very insightful tweet comparing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic to the suffering of Aboriginal people caused by colonial invasion [27]:

“Sudden arrival of an invader from another land, decimating populations, creating terror. Forces the population to make enormous sacrifices & completely change how they live in order to survive. COVID19 or Cook 1770?”

The obsession with “protecting national interests” that the Australian ruling class have whipped up through their Cold War drive is also being used by them to justify repressive measures and laws targeting workers’ industrial action and more militant unions, both of which are branded as harmful to “national interests.”

Bottom: Some of the Trotskyist Platform placards at the 17 August 2019 demonstration in Sydney against the pro-colonial rioters in Hong Kong included messages warning that the Australian ruling class’ campaign against socialistic China is fuelling a “national security” obsession that would be used to attack people and movements not even directly connected to the Cold War drive. Top: 18 July 2019, Canberra: David McBride, the whistleblower who revealed to the media details of horrific war crimes committed by Australian troops in Afghanistan speaks at a rally in his defence. The Australian regime is prosecuting McBride with charges that could see him jailed for 50 years for his brave exposure of “the Australian Defence Force’s unethical, harmful and highly politicised leadership.” There is no doubt that McBride as well as other persecuted whistleblowers, dissident lawyers and investigative journalists are victims of the “national security” hysteria largely created by the Cold War McCarthyist witchhunt against anyone deemed to be a supporter of Red China.

More insightful people, even those who do not necessarily have sympathy for socialistic China are starting to see the threat of broader repression posed by Cold War witch-hunting. Thus, although no mainstream politician from any party and not a single journalist, that we know of, from the main media outlets have had the courage to publicly defend Moselmane, there were prominent community voices that did protest against his witch-hunt. Prominent left-liberal Stuart Rees, an Emeritus Professor at the University of Sydney and the founder director of the Sydney Peace Foundation issued a statement condemning the witch-hunt [28]. In it, Rees insisted that:

“Mosselmane was the victim of character assassination for questioning anti-Chinese sentiment and for praising Chinese leadership’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic in Wuhan.”

An article in the April 10 issue of the Australian Muslim Times newspaper also condemned the witch-hunt of Moselmane [29], noting that:

“The weak-kneed response of this onslaught against a colleague by the NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay MP is highly disappointing and shown to be a leader incapable of standing up for her colleagues and for what’s right.”

The article also quoted a protest letter to the NSW ALP leader by Chinese Community Council of Australia’s Dr Anthony Pun, where Pun stated that:

“…we are indebted to the Hon Shaoquett Moselmane MLC, who have shown empathy and compassion to our difficulties, particularly to racists taunts, racially vilification and hate speech…. We are aware of the recent media attempting to discredit him and saying that his remarks on China was inappropriate was unwarranted and simply wrong.”

The Australian Muslim Times article also reported on the statements of others who opposed the witch-hunt of Moselmane:

“Mr Bashir Sawalha, President of United Australian Palestinian Workers Association (UAPWA) has condemned the spiteful media attacks on Mr Moselmane and has also criticised the lack of support for him by Ms McKay.”

We welcome the fact that such a broad range of voices have condemned this McCarthyist witch-hunt. There needs to the broadest possible united-front push back against the Cold War persecution of people who make positive comments about the PRC or express support for her. And we need to the resist the broader attacks on democratic rights that such McCarthyist persecution is driving.

Ditch the ALP – Let’s Build a Workers Party That
Will Actually Stand Up to the Capitalists and their Media

Despite being stabbed in the back multiple times by his own ALP colleagues, Shaoquett Moselmane has reaffirmed his commitment to the Labor Party. He released a statement that, while expressing deepest gratitude to those who offered solidarity with him against the recent attacks, asserted that “it is through the Australian Labor Party that we can advance the wellbeing and welfare of all Australians” [30]. Yet many of the supporters of Moselmane, who is rather popular amongst working class communities of Middle Eastern, African, Asian and South American origins, may have other thoughts. They would have been horrified at how the ALP leadership joined in the witch-hunt of the person they see as the spokesman for their concerns and would have noted how few – perhaps none (!) – of his Labor parliamentary colleagues actually publicly came to his defence in a forceful, high-profile manner.

Some of Moselmane’s supporters are likely amongst the many working class people who support the ALP through gritted teeth. Such people have long ago lost faith in the Labor Party’s commitment, let alone ability, to deliver meaningful social change. Many of these people have seen Labor Party leaders time and again betray promises privately made to them to make greater efforts to reduce inequality, ease the shortage of affordable rental accommodation and genuinely oppose racist attacks on non-white communities. Nevertheless these people, many from migrant backgrounds or lower-paid workers, cling on to the ALP because they hope that a few good people there can at least make some headway in changing the ALP’s stance, however minimally, on a few issues: perhaps make the ALP take a stronger stand on opposing job slashing by bosses, more truly stand for genuine multiculturalism, curb its strident support for Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine and wind back its fulsome adherence to the U.S.-led Cold War drive against China. Yet, as the witch-hunt of Moselmane again confirms, these have proven to be false hopes. Despite the sincerity of rank and file ALP supporters who hold these illusions, the truth is that the ALP has never sought to curb the “right” of even profitable companies to slash jobs whenever that is what it takes to further boost their own filthy profits. And the Labor Party is just as rabid in supporting Israel’s murderous oppression of Palestinian people as the Tories are and just as fervent in lining up behind the Cold War drive against socialistic China. And as for the type of “multiculturalism” envisaged by the ALP, one has only to look at the actions of the previous two leaders of the NSW ALP. At a meeting in the Blue Mountains in September 2018, former ALP leader Michael Daley incited racial prejudice when he disgustingly blamed migrants – especially from Asia – for taking local jobs and pushing young people out of Sydney [31]. Four months earlier, Daley’s predecessor Luke Foley also inflamed hostility to people of colour by despicably claiming that refugees are swamping Western Sydney leading to a “white flight” of Anglo families from these suburbs [32]. Meanwhile, just last month, the last ALP NSW premier, Kristina Keneally, now a senior member of federal Labor’s shadow ministry, was blowing out of the same dog whistle to racism as Daley and Foley as she called for a cut to migration and for local workers to get a “first go at jobs” [33].

To all those disillusioned with the ALP because it fails to actually stand up to the big end of town and refuses to fully shed its own white nationalist prejudices let alone challenge these notions, we say that it is high time to throw the ALP into the non-recyclable bin. The ALP is useless as an instrument for progressive change. And the problem is not merely that the ALP has lost its way. The bitter truth is that the ALP was never on the right track. Let’s remember that the Labor Party was founded on the principle of the White Australia Policy exclusion of Asian and other non-white immigrants. It is true that in certain periods – like the Whitlam years – the ALP oversaw some progressive reforms. But these were only ceded because the ruling class was in a weakened position –it was losing the Vietnam War to the heroic Vietnamese communists during the Whitlam period and facing a resurgent left and workers movement – and needed to grant the masses some concessions. These measures were taken by the ALP in order to stave off a much more deep-going working class radicalisation that could have conquered still greater gains for the masses. Yet, even at the best of times, the ALP’s approach has always been to try and make some piecemeal reforms for workers while retaining the acceptance of the capitalist bigwigs. This program has been a failure because the interests of the working class and those of the capitalist business owners are completely counter-posed. Every time that ALP leaders kowtow before the capitalist class and their media, they make this ruling class stronger, which in turn puts the ALP under even greater pressure to prostrate before these bigwigs. Such is logic of the ALP’s irreversible spiral downwards. For example, by pandering to the Murdoch and Fairfax media and the likes of Hadley and Credlin in their attacks on Moselmane, NSW ALP leader Jodi McKay strengthened the authority of these capitalist media outfits. So when the Murdoch media went on a crusade against today’s Black Lives Matter protests, McKay was under more pressure to bow to the wishes of Murdoch’s media than she otherwise would have been. This she duly did. Yesterday, Jodi McKay attacked Liberal premier Gladys Berejiklian from the right for not having then banned the planned protest. “Is (Premier Berejiklian) really giving her approval for a mass rally with potentially thousands of participants, when the maximum number of people allowed to visit a private home remains just five,” McKay told Murdoch’s Daily Telegraph [34]. It was this white supremacist-pandering attack by the NSW Labor leader on Berejiklian’s supposed softness on the protest that then pushed the conservative premier to move to ban today’s antiracist demonstration.

What we need is a workers party that in direct contrast to the ALP is not interested in gaining the approval or even the tolerance of any section of the capitalist class. Such a party would be based on the understanding that the interests of the working class masses can only be advanced through consistent opposition to the entire capitalist class. It would fight to restrict the “right” of capitalist bosses to slash jobs and fight for laws that would force company owners to increase their hiring of permanent workers at the expense of their profits. The workers party that we need would understand that advancing the masses interests can only come through building genuine workers unity. That means replacing the ALP’s hypocritical platitudes to “multiculturalism” and “reconciliation” with a merciless war against all outbreaks of white supremacy. It would fight for mass union/Aboriginal/Asian/Muslim/African mobilisations to crush violent redneck attacks, for the immediate jailing of all police and prison guards responsible for the deaths of Aboriginal people in custody and for the granting of all the rights of citizenship to all refugees, guest workers and international students. Such a party would also stand by all the peoples of the world subjugated by the same Australian capitalist class that exploits workers here at home, by the peoples subjugated by Canberra’s Washington big brother ally and by all those downtrodden by the reactionary regimes supported by these U.S. and Australian imperialists. That means it would oppose Australian imperialist plunder and paternalist bullying in the South Pacific and would demand the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. and Australian troops from Afghanistan, the Persian Gulf and all of the Middle East. It would also oppose all U.N. and U.S. economic sanctions on the peoples of North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Iran. A true workers party would also demand the removal of all Israeli troops and settlers from all of the West Bank and Gaza and fight for the destruction of the racial-supremacist Israeli state and its replacement by a bi-national, secular workers state where Jews and Palestinians will live together in socialist harmony. Most crucially, the international policy of a party that truly defends workers interests would emphasise the unconditional defence of socialistic rule in China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and Laos against imperialist military pressure, lying propaganda campaigns and Western-backed anti-communist forces. This policy is essential despite the bureaucratic deformations and capitalist intrusions that distort socialistic rule in these countries. In short, what we need is a party that will defend the states where workers have achieved power abroad while fighting for workers rule here in Australia.

From causing a growing gap between rich and poor to its inability to provide secure, permanent jobs to its flawed response to the pandemic to the racist state brutality that it administers, capitalist rule is every day making life more miserable for the masses. The widespread revelations of racist state terror against black people and the brutal response of police to Black Lives Matter protests not only shows the true nature of capitalist “democracy” but exposes the blatant hypocrisy of capitalist regimes when they make allegations against the PRC, DPRK and other socialistic states over “human rights”. Now in the U.S., many working class people are questioning their faith in capitalist “democracy” and for the first time in a long while have begun to take the political offensive. Here in Australia, today’s mass anti-racist protests are a sign of the potential to turn around the ruling class’ decades-long offensive against Aboriginal people, other people of colour and the broader working class masses. Yet, as we look to possibly move onto the front foot, we need to guard our rear against attack. The more that we resist, the more that the exploiting class will fear the spectre of communism and, thus, the more that they will resort to Cold War witch-hunting and propaganda campaigns. That makes it doubly important to resist the Cold War attacks on those who sympathise with, or praise, the PRC and other socialistic countries. Let us condemn the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane and demand: No to the targeting of Australian-Chinese community organisations! Stop the persecution of pro-PRC Chinese international students! Rebuff the all-sided attacks on democratic rights that the McCarthyist anti-PRC witch-hunt is fuelling!

References

  1. Charles Calisher, Dennis Carroll, Rita Colwell, Ronald B Corley, Peter Daszak, Christian Drosten, Luis Enjuanes, Jeremy Farrar, Hume Field, Josie Golding, Alexander Gorbalenya, Bart Haagmans, James M Hughes, William B Karesh, Gerald T Keusch, Sai Kit Lam, Juan Lubroth, John S Mackenzie, Larry Madoff, Jonna Mazet, Peter Palese, Stanley Perlman, Leo Poon, Bernard Roizman, Linda Saif, Kanta Subbarao and Mike Turner, Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19 (published 19 February 2020), The Lancet, Volume 395, Issue 10226, E42-E43, 7 March 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
  2. WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), World Health Organization (WHO) website, 28 February 2020, https://www.who.int/publications-detail/report-of-the-who-china-joint-mission-on-coronavirus-disease-2019-(covid-19)
  3. Australian Department of Health, Doorstop interview about funding for mental health initiatives and novel coronavirus, Department of Health website, 30 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/doorstop-interview-about-funding-for-mental-health-initiatives-and-novel-coronavirus
  4. Australian Department of Health, Chief Medical Officer on ABC News Breakfast about novel coronavirus, Department of Health website, 31 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/chief-medical-officer-on-abc-news-breakfast-about-novel-coronavirus-0
  5. Tucker Higgins, Trump thanks China’s Xi Jinping for handling of coronavirus, CNBC website,  24 January 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/24/trump-thanks-chinas-xi-jinping-for-handling-of-coronavirus.html
  6. Chanel Zagon, Two female students from University of Melbourne brutally bashed in CBD, Nine News website, 17 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/female-university-of-melbourne-students-brutally-bashed-in-cbd-assault/2ae42833-10bf-4e72-b55c-550a5ec06d91?ref=BP_RSS_ninenews_5_-disgusting–footage-shows-female-students-bashed-in-vile-attack_170420
  7. Jason Fang, Samuel Yang and Christina Zhou, Coronavirus has fuelled racism against Asian-Australians, but why isn’t official data showing it?, ABC News website, 5 May 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-05/coronavirus-racist-attacks-asian-australians-missing-data/12211630?nw=0
  8. Isobel Roe, Racism towards Chinese Australians over coronavirus condemned, ABC Radio PM program website, 11 February 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/racism-towards-chinese-australians-over-coronavirus-condemned/11955286
  9. Chanel Zagon, Health authorities slam racist attacks on Royal Children’s Hospital staff, Nine News website, 27 February 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/health-authorities-slam-racist-attacks-on-royal-childrens-hospital-staff/97770fda-0540-497b-add7-949636f3b014?
  10. ABC News, Doctor calls for unity during coronavirus pandemic after being targeted in racist attack, 20 April 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-20/coronavirus-geelong-doctor-calls-for-unity-after-racist-attack/12164282
  11. Chanel Zagon, Coronavirus: Melbourne bus driver racially abused by passenger, Nine News website, 3 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-melbourne-bus-driver-racially-abused-by-passenger/c87d83b7-36e0-4171-8409-49dffc31c986
  12. Samuel Yang, Video shows Chinese woman being racially attacked in Melbourne over coronavirus, ABC News website, https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-06/coronavirus-woman-racist-attack-in-melbourne/12216854?nw=0
  13. Rory McClaren, Horrific racist attack on Adelaide councillor, Nine News website, 8 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-racist-attack-adelaide-councillor/5578323a-aa21-4dc5-933b-db0394effdf7?
  14. Eliza McPhee, Man armed with a WHIP goes on a racist rant outside Chinese Consulate in Sydney and accuses visitors wearing masks of spreading coronavirus, 2 April 2020, Daily Mail Australian Edition website, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8178421/Man-armed-WHIP-goes-racist-tirade-outside-Chinese-Consulate.html
  15. Nature Editorial, Stop the coronavirus stigma now, Nature website, 7 April 2020, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01009-0
  16. Callum Foote, Since when is it a crime to report a crime? Bernard Collaery exposes the Timor Sea betrayal, Michael West Media website, 28 April 2020, https://www.michaelwest.com.au/since-when-did-it-become-a-crime-to-report-a-crime-bernard-collaery-exposes-the-timor-sea-betrayal/
  17. Blake Foden, ‘Sad times’: Bernard Collaery laments ‘now fragile democracy’ as pre-trial hearing takes place in secret, The Canberra Times website, 25 May 2020, https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6768177/sad-times-collaery-laments-now-fragile-democracy-as-pre-trial-hearing-takes-place-in-secret/?cs=14225
  18. Associated Press, David McBride to represent himself in court because he ‘doesn’t trust’ Defence to clear lawyer, Nine News website, 7 November 2019, https://www.9news.com.au/national/australian-army-whistleblower-david-mcbride-in-court-represent-himself/0c6279c2-1fc3-4407-8a00-dae89f16dad4
  19. Elizabeth Byrne, Afghan Files leak accused David McBride faces ACT Supreme Court for first time, ABC News website, 14 June 2019, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-13/abc-raids-afghan-files-leak-accused-court-canberra/11206682
  20. Julian Kossoff, 2 top French doctors said on live TV that coronavirus vaccines should be tested on poor Africans, leaving viewers horrified, Business Insider Australia website, 3 April 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/coronavirus-vaccines-france-doctors-say-test-poor-africans-outrage-2020-4?r=US&IR=T
  21. Stephanie Busari and Barbara Wojazer, French doctors’ proposal to test Covid-19 treatment in Africa slammed as ‘colonial mentality’, CNN website, 7 April 2020,  https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/07/africa/french-doctors-africa-covid-19-intl/index.html
  22. William Feuer, WHO chief addresses death threats, racist insults: ‘I don’t give a damn’, CNBC website, 8 April 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/08/who-chief-addresses-death-threats-racist-insults-i-dont-give-a-damn.html
  23. African Union, African Union reaffirms its unwavering support to WHO, African Union website, 8 April 2020, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20200408/african-union-reaffirms-its-unwavering-support-who
  24. Wikipedia, South Africa–Taiwan relations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa%E2%80%93Taiwan_relations (accessed 9 May 2020)
  25. Judith Miller, 3 NATIONS WIDENING NUCLEAR CONTACTS, The New York Times, 28 June 1981, https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/28/world/3-nations-widening-nuclear-contacts.html
  26. Greg Barns, New ASIO law one more step towards a totalitarian state, Sydney Morning Herald website, 13 May 2020, https://www.smh.com.au/national/new-asio-law-one-more-step-towards-a-totalitarian-state-20200513-p54smi.html 
  27. SBS, Scott Morrison, Peter Dutton slam Victorian health official over Captain Cook tweet, SBS website, 1 May 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/scott-morrison-peter-dutton-slam-victorian-health-official-over-captain-cook-tweet
  28. Stuart Rees, Character Assassination as Journalism & Politics, John Menadue – Pearls and Irritations website, 5 May 2020, https://johnmenadue.com/stuart-rees-character-assassination-as-journalism-politics/
  29. Zia Ahmad, Witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane condemned, Australian Muslim Times, 10 April 2020, https://www.amust.com.au/2020/04/witch-hunt-of-shaoquett-moselmane-condemned/
  30. The World Observer Newspaper, Letter from the Hon Shaoquett Moselmane MLC, 13 April 2020, https://theworldobserver.com.au/2020/04/13/letter-from-hon-shaoquett-moselmane-mlc/
  31. Australian Associated Press, Michael Daley claims Asian workers taking young people’s jobs in Sydney, The Guardian website, 19 March 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/19/michael-daley-claims-asian-workers-taking-young-peoples-jobs-in-sydney
  32. Anne Davies, Luke Foley apologises for ‘white flight’ comment, saying he now knows it’s offensive, The Guardian website, 24 May 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/may/24/luke-foley-defends-white-flight-comment-but-denies-dog-whistling
  33. Euan Black, Labor’s Kristina Keneally slammed for linking immigration to unemployment, The New Daily website, 3 May 2020, https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2020/05/03/kristina-keneally-immigration/
  34. Jenna Benson, NSW Government Seek To Stop Tomorrow’s Protests In Sydney, WSFM radio website, 5 June 2020, https://www.wsfm.com.au/local/nsw-government-seek-to-stop-black-lives-matter-protest-in-sydney/ (accessed 7 June 2020)

Socialist Political Prisoner Cannot Get a Fair Trial in Australia

Capitalist Court Rejects Chan Han Choi’s Permanent Stay Application

Socialist Political Prisoner
Cannot Get a Fair Trial in Australia

6 December 2019 – Yesterday, a judge in the NSW Supreme Court knocked back a motion by socialist political prisoner, Chan Han Choi, for a Permanent Stay in the proceedings against him. Since his arrest, Australia’s racist, rich people’s regime has violated many of the rights that Choi should be entitled to as a prisoner and defendant. As a result, Choi submitted a motion for a Permanent Stay which was heard last Friday. If the motion had succeeded, Choi’s trial would have been put off indefinitely on the grounds that he cannot get a fair trial and he would have been released from custody having been found neither innocent nor guilty. Curiously, not only did the judge give no reasons in court for dismissing Choi’s application but the court later announced that the judge’s detailed statement outlining his decision will not be published on the court’s website until after the trial. That will, all too conveniently, shield the blatantly unfair judgement from some of the detailed public scrutiny that it deserves. 

Chan Han Choi has spent nearly two years in prison now, jailed largely because of his political sympathy for socialistic North Korea. Choi is an Australian citizen who migrated here from South Korea 32 years ago. At the time of his arrest, Choi was working as a cleaner in a public hospital. This working class man was living in a modest rented unit in Eastwood. Choi is a worldly, knowledgeable person who loves Japanese food and Western classical music. He is also a husband, a proud father of a son in his mid-30s and the proud grandfather to two infant granddaughters below the age of five. Nineteen days ago, Choi marked his 61st birthday locked up in harsh conditions in a maximum security prison in Sydney.

Choi was arrested in December 2017 on charges of attempting to help the people of the DPRK (Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, i.e. “North Korea”) circumvent crippling UN economic sanctions by brokering trade deals to help the DPRK export its produce abroad. An additional charge was later added that Choi allegedly attempted to broker a deal to enable the DPRK to import petroleum products, which she is cruelly prohibited from doing under the sanctions. Choi has pleaded Not Guilty to all charges. Indeed, the “evidence” in the charges brought against him is rather thin. Even the Australian Federal Police (AFP) acknowledge that none of the alleged deals that he is charged with brokering actually went through. Indeed, the AFP’s Statement of Facts on the case has to concede, when speaking about many of the individual alleged deals, that those alleged deals were cancelled by Choi himself or canned by the DPRK months before his arrest.

However, as Choi’s supporters insisted in the call out for a protest held just prior to the Permanent Stay hearing:

Even if the claims against him turn out to be true, he is no criminal from the working class standpoint. Quite the opposite! It would simply prove that he was aiding people who are being ground down by the most severe sanctions ever imposed.

Choi is a humanitarian who has seen the suffering that the sanctions have caused to North Korea’s people. He is also a socialist who sympathises with North Korea because he likes the society’s egalitarianism. Whatever one thinks of North Korea’s leaders, the fact is that her people have built a system based upon public ownership of the key banks, industries, agricultural land and mines. It is a state that was won by the masses in brave struggle to defeat the former capitalists and landlords. In supporting such a socialistic system, Choi is also standing by the interests of those in Australia hurt by privatisation, casualisation of employment, job slashing by bosses, bullying by banks and rising rents. Choi can be considered an anti-privatisation warrior and a champion of public ownership – that is of the system that would favour the working class majority of this country and the world. Working class people must now in turn stand by him!

Even within the context of the pro-imperialist sanctions laws that Choi has been charged under, Choi cannot get a fair trial. The reason is very simple: political prejudice. The Australian capitalist regime is determined to persecute Choi because of his resolute sympathy for a socialistic country. Thus, in response to Choi’s bail application, which was rejected by a Supreme Court judge two months ago, a major part of the Prosecution’s 10 October written submission opposing bail was the claim that Choi’s alleged offending is “objectively serious” because of his loyalty to the DPRK. In other words, the Australian regime is insisting that not simply because of his alleged actions but because of his political views – of strong sympathy for a socialistic country – Choi should be accorded less rights than he otherwise would be. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) Statement of Facts on the case carries the same line. In this Statement of Facts, the AFP give as a reason for opposing bail Choi’s statements from prison (subsequently posted to YouTube) identifying the economic sanctions on North Korea as being unjust and unfair. So, for expressing his views and his opposition to the cruel imperialist sanctions on North Korea, Choi is being persecuted. This is blatant anti-communist discrimination very reminiscent of the McCarthy era, Cold War witch hunts. And it is because of this political discrimination that Choi was denied bail even though he is not accused of killing anyone, bashing anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, stealing from anyone or even of espionage. By contrast, the racist Northern Territory policeman charged with the shooting murder two weeks ago of Aboriginal teenager, Kumanjayi Walker, was given bail straight away. So was former Archbishop George Pell after he was charged with sexually assaulting children.

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) in its 10 October 2019 “Statement of Facts” includes among its reasons for opposing bail the fact that Chan Han Choi has made statements from prison opposing the economic sanctions on the DPRK and protesting the violation of his rights. To oppose bail on such grounds is blatant persecution of a person for expressing their political views.

It is not only in response to his bail application that Choi has endured political discrimination. He and his family have been subjected to it from the time of his very arrest. In prison, Choi has had special restrictions imposed on him far in excess of those imposed on convicted murderers and rapists. For the last year, Choi has been banned from making any telephone calls to his friends. The only person that he is nominally allowed to call is his wife. However, the authorities insist that any communication on the phone that Choi makes must be in English. This makes communication between Choi and his wife practically impossible given that her English is very limited and his own English is far from fluent. Earlier this year, two officers from the Corrections Intelligence Group “visited” Choi and threatened that should he speak in Korean on the phone he would be sent to Goulburn Supermax prison. Choi soon found out that he could not communicate with his wife in any meaningful way now and it was risky too – an inadvertent break into Korean could see him isolated in Goulburn Supermax. So that line of communication became completely cut.

To break Choi’s spirit the authorities have gone to great lengths to isolate Choi from his entire family. When Choi was arrested, his adult son’s house was also raided and his son and daughter-in-law subjected to threatening interrogations. Although police did not charge his son they made it clear that any support for, or association with, his father could see him in trouble. Thus, his son has been effectively barred from communication with Choi. Meanwhile, prison authorities also refused permission for Choi to even telephone his daughter-in-law. As a result, since his arrest nearly two years ago, Choi has not been able to speak to, let alone see, his own son, daughter-in law and infant granddaughters. To further try and break Choi’s resolve, Australian regime agencies have had Choi’s son sacked from a senior, skilled role at a reputed IT infrastructure company. The AFP told Choi’s son that he would not be able to work in a professional role again.

Meanwhile, even as he was preparing to enter a plea and then to prepare for his upcoming trial, Australian authorities restricted Choi’s access to his lawyers. Thus, for over a whole year since their initial visit on 11 September last year, Choi’s current lawyers were only able to visit him twice in jail and only on one of those visits were they able to be accompanied by an interpreter. By contrast, Choi’s previous regime-appointed lawyer, who was pressuring him to plead guilty, was able to visit him with an interpreter once a week. It seems that once the regime realised that Choi’s current lawyers were not going to pressure him to plead guilty, they started curbing their access to Choi. So, after not having any problem getting an initial visit to Choi, these lawyers and any interpreters were suddenly required to be vetted for special approval to visit an NSI (National Security Interest) inmate. This approval finally came through less than three months ago – a whole year after they had first visited Choi. The timing of that approval is also rather “interesting” – it happened to be around the time that Choi submitted his motion for a Permanent Stay!

Australian Regime Intercepts Choi’s Communications with His Lawyers

Given the blatant Cold War discrimination that Australian state institutions have subjected Choi to, it is obvious that these same institutions are not going to give Choi a fair trial. Therefore, the grounds that Choi has for a Permanent Stay are both compelling and very numerous. In the hearing last Friday, Choi’s barrister chose to focus on two key grounds. Firstly, he detailed how Choi can have no confidence that his communications with his legal representatives are not being intercepted by state agencies. With such well-founded fears, not only can he not properly plan his own trial defence with his legal representatives, Choi can have little confidence that privileged communication between him and his legal representatives are not being passed on to the Prosecution. Concerned about this, Choi’s lawyers wrote to various government agencies seeking assurances that they have not been intercepting communications between Choi and his legal representatives. However, by the time of the Permanent Stay hearing, ASIO had failed to respond. Meanwhile, the AFP’s response refused to give any assurance, only stating in a non-committal manner that: “The Australian Federal Police (AFP) does not comment on operational matters before the court.”

When asked by Choi’s lawyers to give a guarantee that they had not and will not engage in any interception of Choi’s privileged communications with his lawyers, the AFP notably refused to give such a guarantee.
You may not feel like drinking water as your blood alcohol level increases, which can dampen your mood and decrease your sex desire. order levitra without prescription A common injection Prostaglandin E1 can be inserted in the urethra for uk viagra prices successful erections. Supplements that are mainly powerful for this aim are fish oil, evening primrose, and borage sildenafil pfizer oil. That is the reason; buying tadalafil online has been performed by the joint manufacturers Bayer Pharmaceutical, GSK and SP.

Of all the responses received by Choi’s lawyers from government agencies, the most striking was the 7 November response of the Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW, Peter Severin. In his letter to Choi’s lawyers, which the lawyers submitted as part of their affidavit to the court, the Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW admits that prison officers are indeed intercepting phone calls between Choi and his legal representatives. Severin claims that this is necessary because Choi is an NSI inmate. He tries to divert from this admission by stating that: “correspondence, including faxes and emails from a legal practitioner to a NSI inmate must be delivered to the inmate without opening, inspecting or reading the contents.” However, one can have little confidence that the prisons are actually following even this policy. This is especially the case when one considers what occurred when Choi’s lawyers sent him, by post, several months ago crucial legal documents and evidence. Choi did not receive these documents as they were likely intercepted too!

The Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW) attempts to minimise the significance of their interception of communications between Choi and his legal representatives by claiming that “it is the practice of CSNSW that officers periodically ‘drop in’ to the line, listen for long enough to check that English is being spoken and that the call is with the approved recipient ….” However, even if CSNSW officers were actually confining themselves to such a procedure, they would still be on line long enough to potentially listen in on important legal tactics being discussed between Choi and his legal representatives.

The Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW) admits that CSNSW officers have been intercepting privileged communications between Chan Han Choi and his lawyers. Not surprisingly, he tried to downplay the significance of these interceptions.

Of course, one would have to be extremely naive to think that state personnel assigned to listen in on communications between Choi and his legal representatives are confining themselves to short bursts of snooping. This is especially when one knows that Australian state agencies have a sordid history of spying on privileged communications between others in order to suit the interests of the capitalist masters that they serve. During Australia’s 2004 negotiations with East Timor over oil and gas resources in the Timor Sea, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) planted huge numbers of listening devices in order to listen to the negotiation strategy discussions of East Timorese ministers and negotiators and thus give the Australian government – and the filthy rich corporate bigwigs of Woodside Petroleum and BHP whose interests they were representing – the advantage in the negotiations. If that is what Australian state agencies do to gain an unfair advantage in a dispute with what it calls a “close friend”, they will surely have no hesitation in snooping in on the discussions between a person accused of aiding what they deem to be a “criminal state” and his lawyers in order to gain the advantage in their prosecution of him.

The other important aspect of the Australian state spying on East Timorese negotiation strategy discussions is the extent to which they went to cover up this snooping. In 2013, as the remorseful ASIS officer (“Witness K”) who led the bugging was set to travel to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague to expose the operation and to act as a witness for the East Timorese government in its case against the Australian government over the spying, ASIO raided the home of this Witness K and seized his passport thus preventing him from testifying at The Hague. They also raided Witness K’s lawyer, Bernard Collaery. Five years later, the same AFP and Commonwealth DPP that are prosecuting Choi hit up Witness K and Collaery with charges of revealing to the media and the East Timorese government the 2004 bugging operation. Both face charges that could see them imprisoned for years. If Australian regime agencies are capable of such extreme measures to cover up their spying of those that they are in dispute with, they would not blink an eyelid to simply lie to cover up the extent of their spying on the privileged communications between Choi and his lawyer.


12 September 2018, Canberra: People protest the Australian state’s persecution of “Witness K” and his lawyer Bernard Collaery for revealing to the world that Australia’s ASIS spy agency had spied on East Timorese ministers and negotiators to give the Australian government an unfair advantage in oil negotiations with East Timor. If Australian regime agencies are capable of such extreme measures to cover up their spying on supposed “friends” that they are in dispute with, they would not blink an eyelid to simply lie to cover up the extent of their spying on the privileged communications between Choi and his lawyer.

The second main ground that Choi’s barrister focussed on in last Friday’s hearing is the difficulty that his legal representatives face in preparing his defence because of restrictions blocking interpreters communicating with Choi. Choi can roughly speak some colloquial English. However, his English is far from adequate to understand complex legal concepts and legal evidence when presented in English. He needs Korean-English interpreters to communicate with his lawyers and barristers. However, CSNSW have determined that any interpreter visiting Choi or even interpreting in an Audio-Visual Link (AVL) connection with him must have special clearance for contact with NSI inmates. The problem is that none of the Korean-English interpreters available have NSI clearance and none of the regular interpreters want to go through the process of getting approval (it is time consuming and intrusive). Although a non-regular interpreter with clearance was later found, when she was used for a 21 November conference between Choi and his lawyer and barrister, she was unable to communicate chunks of what was being communicated to Choi from English to Korean. There were many English words that she simply did not understand. Midway, through the conference, the interpreter said, “I will contact the agency as I do not understand this. This is too serious and hard for me. I am only Level 2. I will let the agency know next time they should send someone more advanced in English for this matter.” Except the agency has no one else with NSI clearance or willing to seek it! We will not name the interpreter involved as she is an innocent thrown in the deep end as a result of a draconian system to keep Choi and others like him isolated. However, the long and short of the matter is that Choi and his legal representatives are unable to properly prepare his legal defence because they cannot access the interpreters needed to adequately communicate with each other.

Affidavit from Choi’s lawyers detailed how the only Korean-English interpreter with the required special clearance to translate discussions between Choi and his lawyers/barristers does not have the required translation capacity (we have blacked out her name so as to not cause any embarrassment to this interpreter who is an innocent in this episode). No interpreters with the required capacity have clearance to interpret for Choi as few want to go through the intrusive and time-consuming process of getting the required clearance.

All this is compounded by the fact that funding granted by Legal Aid for interpreters in Choi’s matter has been extremely limited. This is almost certainly no accident. It bears an eerie resemblance to what is going on in another case of political persecution – that of Witness K. In late August, Witness K’s counsel angrily announced that his client had received almost no funding from Legal Aid despite having applied for it more than a year previously! Witness K’s counsel, Haydn Carmichael, accused Legal Aid of an “extraordinary unexplained roadblock.”

Even If Choi Gets Bail in the Future He Still Can’t Get a Fair Trial

During last Friday’s hearing, the sitting judge intimated that should Choi be able to get bail in the future following a fresh application, the issues raised in his Permanent Stay application would be resolved. However, this is definitely not the case. The issue of getting interpreters to speak to Choi would be partially resolved in that they would no longer be obstructed from contacting him. However, the problem of inadequate Legal Aid funding to hire interpreters would not go away one bit. More importantly, Choi would still face the threat of having his communications with his legal representatives intercepted. Let’s recall that ASIO and the AFP have both refused to give assurances that they are not even now intercepting Choi’s communications with his lawyers and barristers. And given that Corrective Services NSW is openly admitting to intercepting Choi’s communications with his legal representatives, one can have little confidence that other government agencies would not do this even if Choi is granted bail. After all, the Australian capitalist regime’s perception of Choi would not change one iota if he is granted bail in the future. Given that they believe that his communications with his legal representatives should be intercepted now, they would still believe that they should be intercepted in the future. It is instructive to again recall what an Australian state agency did in East Timor a few years ago. They did not merely bug phone calls amongst East Timorese politicians and negotiators. Instead, under the cover of an aid project to refurbish government buildings, the Australian regime planted hundreds of listening devices in East Timorese ministerial and government buildings. If they are prepared to undertake such a massive, complex and expensive operation abroad against a “friendly country”, they would not hesitate, even in the least, to plant a couple of listening bugs and phone wiretaps in the future bail residence of a person who they believe is politically loyal to a country they deem a “criminal state.”

Moreover, we already know for certain that Australian state agencies have placed Choi’s supporters under intensive surveillance. Point 124.J of the AFP’s Statement of Facts states that:

several members who attended the rally specified in (i) [the 13 April 2019 Free Chan Han Choi rally that the AFP report on – actually complain about – in their previous point], have visited and been in regular telephone contact with the Accused while in NSW Corrective Services custody. Several of these member [sic] have attended NSW Central Court on dates where the Accused appeared for mention. On one occasion (4 July 2018), one of the Accused’s associates removed their business shirt while in Court to reveal a t-shirt containing the words “See You in Pyongyang”, positioning themselves to feature on a video-uplink with the Accused.

There are three key points apparent from this statement. Firstly, to be able to determine that amongst the dozens of people attending the 13 April 2019 united front rally in defence of Choi are the three people visiting Choi in custody, the AFP and/or ASIO and/or other regime agencies must have placed the 13 April 2019 protest under surveillance and must also have specifically honed in on the people allowed to visit Choi. Secondly, to be able to determine that some of these people have “been in regular phone contact with the Accused” (actually they should have said “had been” since for the last year Choi has been barred from phone contact with these friends), regime agencies must have been monitoring Choi’s calls to them. Thirdly, given the position that Choi’s supporter (who we spoke to) was sitting in the court room on 4 July 2018, there was no way that any AFP/ASIO officers present at the court room that day could have by their own eyes determined that, “one of the Accused’s associates removed their business shirt while in Court to reveal a t-shirt containing the words `See You in Pyongyang’, positioning themselves to feature on a videouplink with the Accused.” They could only have determined what “one of the Accused’s associates” was trying to do by listening in on phone communications amongst Choi’s supporters.  

The AFP’s own Statement of Facts on Choi’s case reveals the extent to which Australian regime agencies have been stalking and monitoring Choi’s supporters. Some of the information contained in this document (that one of Choi’s supporters positioned “themselves to feature on a video-uplink with the Accused” during one of Choi’s court mentions) could only have been obtained by intercepting communications between Choi’s supporters.

The level of surveillance of Choi’s supporters by the Australian regime is further emphasised in Point 20 of the Crown’s 10 October 2019 submissions opposing Choi’s bail application. It states that:

On two occasions when the Applicant’s matter has been before Central Local Court for mention, supporters have attended with one of them wearing a t-shirt bearing the flag of the DPRK above the words “See you in Pyongyang” which was displayed prominently (the first time, in the foyer of the court; the second time, in the body of the court during the mention of the matter) and then covered up. On the first occasion, those supporters also photographed the outside of the court including members of the Prosecution who were walking down the steps and then immediately attending an internet café before splitting up.

Choi’s supporters who were involved in this highly “subversive” act of “wearing a t-shirt bearing the flag of the DPRK” and then “attending an internet cafe” immediately after attending court said that they were in the Internet cafe and then talked together outside for a combined period of over an hour before “splitting up.” That means that the AFP/ASIO officers who stalked them not only tailed them the hundreds of metres from the court to the internet cafe but also carried out surveillance on them for over an hour!

The Commonwealth DPP’s written submission opposing bail for Choi in his October 2019 bail hearing revealed that the Australian regime agencies had stalked Choi’s supporters from a court house to an internet cafe and then maintained surveillance on them until they split up. The supporters who were stalked said they did not split up until over an hour after they first entered the internet cafe – meaning that the relevant regime agency spent at least that long on tracking Choi’s supporters that day.

So, we can draw from these two statements by the AFP and the Commonwealth DPP the following conclusions about the level of Australian regime surveillance of Choi’s supporters:

  • Australian regime agencies have stalked Choi’s supporters and on at least one occasion monitored them for over an hour.
  • Regime agencies carried out surveillance on at least one solidarity rally with Chan Han Choi and honed in on those supporters of Choi visiting him in custody.
  • Regime agencies have monitored the phone calls between Choi and his friends.
  • Regime agencies have listened in on phone communications amongst Choi’s supporters.

If this is the level of surveillance that the regime is placing on Choi’s supporters, what would they be doing to Choi himself should he get bail? They would certainly be intercepting all his communications – including with his lawyers and barristers.

There is another crucial point that should be made here. Because of the obstruction of access to Choi for lawyers and language interpreters, Choi has had to rely on his supporters visiting him in prison to act as go-betweens with his lawyers. Indeed, his access to lawyers and the necessary interpreters became so constricted that on 28 July of this year, Choi formally wrote a signed document to make one of his supporters (who we will refer to as Comrade P) his Power of Attorney. This Comrade P is one of the people referred to in the AFP’s Statement of Facts who both attended the 13 April 2019 Free Chan Han Choi rally and has been visiting Choi in custody. He is also the person the AFP refer to who on 4 July 2018, “removed their business shirt while in Court to reveal a t-shirt containing the words `See You in Pyongyang’, positioning themselves to feature on a videouplink with the Accused” and is also one of Choi’s supporters who the Prosecution’s 10 October 2019 submission reveals was stalked [by Australian/spy agencies] to an internet cafe. The key point is that since, as is evident from the AFP and Commonwealth DPP’s own submissions, Australia’s state agencies are intercepting the communications of – and putting under surveillance – Comrade P and other Choi supporters, these regime agencies are effectively intercepting Choi’s indirect communications with his lawyers. This is especially the case since 28 July when in legal terms the person that Choi made his Power of Attorney, Comrade P, effectively became Choi as far as consultations and instructions to lawyers are concerned. By intercepting this Power of Attorney’s communications, which no doubt means his communications with Choi’s lawyers too, the Australian regime are again intercepting communications between Choi and his lawyer.

Due to the obstacles placed by prison authorities on Choi’s access to his lawyers and to suitably qualified language interpreters, Choi made one of his supporters his Power of Attorney. However this person is among the people who (as revealed by the AFP’s “Statement of Fact’s itself and by the Commonwealth DPP’s submissions to Choi’s October bail hearing) the Australian regime has stalked and monitored and who has apparently also had his phone communications intercepted. Australian regime agencies intercepting phone communications between Choi’s Power of Attorney and his lawyers is equivalent to them intercepting communications between Choi and his lawyers.

In summary, whether it is Choi’s direct communications or his indirect ones via his supporters – and in particular the person he made his Power of Attorney – communications between Choi and his lawyers, that are meant to be privileged, have been intercepted by the agencies of the very state that is prosecuting him. There is thus no way Chan Han Choi can get a fair trial! Even if he was in the future finally granted bail and through some miracle the Australian regime stopped spying on him, they may well have already determined enough information about his intended legal strategy to compromise his defence. As an analogy, consider the Australian intelligence agencies spying on East Timorese officials. The key point that the Australian regime wanted to find out in order to gain the advantage in the oil and gas negotiations, is what East Timor’s bottom line was, i.e. how low they were prepared to settle for. Once they had this information then it would not matter if the spying stopped; Australia would already have a huge unfair advantage in the negotiations. Similarly, once key aspects of Choi’s legal strategy have been determined by the Australian regime through spying, the damage is already done: any (quite hypothetical) ceasing of the spying is not going to reverse the unfair advantage already gained by the prosecution.

But Wait … There’s More!

The main affidavit submitted by Choi’s lawyers to his Permanent Stay hearing included a copy of a 1 November 2018 letter by Legal Aid to Choi threatening that should Choi sack his current lawyers, his “grant of legal aid will be terminated.” Except, as the affidavit stated, “at no stage did he [Choi] communicate with legal aid about wishing for the grant to be assigned to another lawyer.” Although the affidavit itself does not draw any conclusions from this, this fact has much significance. For, since it was not Choi that tried to sack his lawyers and given that Legal Aid was against Choi supposedly sacking his lawyers, it is apparent that a shadowy third party masquerading as Choi sent Legal Aid a phoney communication sacking Choi’s lawyers. Who could this third party be? We cannot be sure. However, to pull off something like that and fool Legal Aid those responsible would almost certainly have been a state actor. It is obvious that they were trying to ensure that Choi would not be represented by his current lawyers. They no doubt hoped that given that Choi was so isolated in prison and communication with him so impeded, a mere forged letter to Legal Aid in Choi’s name would have been sufficient to end these lawyers’ representation of him. So, what would their motivation be for doing this? Prior to Choi retaining his current lawyers, Choi had a government-appointed lawyer who was pressuring him to plead Guilty. In contrast, Choi’s current lawyers were intent on allowing Choi to make the ultimate decision on how he should plead and leant towards recommending that he fight the charges. So, whoever tried to get Choi’s lawyers sacked were obviously enemies of Choi and the DPRK who wanted to see him plead Guilty. That as good as narrows it down to either Australian regime agencies like ASIO or the AFP or to the CIA or the South Korean intelligence agency, the KCIA.

This is hardly the only time that Choi’s adversaries have used dirty tricks methods to try and isolate him. Take the way that CSNSW have attempted to obstruct visits from Choi’s friends. When the three friends visiting Choi in prison first applied to visit him in early March last year – a detailed application was required as the authorities had classified Choi in the most stringent prisoner category (EHR-R/NSI) – CSNSW told them that it would take four to five weeks to process their applications. When they did not receive any feedback by the end of this period, they called CSNSW’s Visits Restrictions Unit on two occasions over the following weeks to find out the status of their applications.  On each occasion they were told that their applications were being processed and a decision would be forthcoming soon. However, when they called a third time, now some seven weeks after their applications were lodged, the CSNSW unit now told them that … there was no record whatsoever in the CSNSW system that any of them had made any applications! Fortunately, Choi’s friends each had copies of their own applications and each of these was witness signed by a CSNSW officer. Nevertheless, the supposed “loss” of their applications was used to slow down the processing of these applications. Indeed, these supporters of Choi were not informed that they had been approved to visit Choi until four and a half months after their initial applications! Moreover, CSNSW only began to inform them that their applications had been successful after one of them sent an E-mail inquiring about the status of their applications. CSNSW responded to that E-mail by E-mailing a copy of a postal letter, dated three weeks earlier, informing the applicant that his application to visit Choi had been successful. However, the address on this letter was wrong: the unit number in the address was written as 1 instead of 11. As a result, the letter sent in the post was never received. Meanwhile, another one of the applicants also never received any letter in the post informing him that his application had been successful. If all that is not enough, after two of these friends in April simultaneously applied to have their visits to Choi extended for a further year (after all the hassle to get approved CSNSW only grants successful applicants a one year period of visitation!) one of them (Comrade P) was again told, when he inquired with the relevant CSNSW unit a month after his application was lodged, that “we have not received any paperwork from LBH [Long Bay Hospital]”! This is despite the other friend of Choi who applied together with this friend – and whose application was indeed witness signed by the same CSNSW officer at the very same time – not having his application lost. Now, one could possibly put one of these “errors,” that delayed Choi’s supporters from getting access to him, down to bureaucratic incompetence. But for all these “mistakes” to occur is simply not possible unless there was a conscious effort by relevant units of CSNSW to use dirty tricks to impede visits to Choi by his supporters.

The fact that dirty tricks were apparently used by an Australian regime institution to try and keep Choi isolated from his supporters adds further weight to the conclusion that forces hostile to Choi had used dirty tricks to try and have his current lawyers sacked. This has much significance for assessing whether Choi can get a fair trial. For, if Australian state agencies – and possibly allied foreign intelligence agencies – are prepared to violate their own stated rules to isolate Choi from both supporters and legal representation, then how can this same state conduct a fair trial of Choi? It can’t! Moreover, the fact that this capitalist state – and possibly allied foreign intelligence agencies – are prepared to use under-handed methods against Choi reinforces the notion that the direct and indirect communications between Choi and his lawyers that are being intercepted by regime agencies could be used to greatly disadvantage Choi in his upcoming trial.

Also included in the main affidavit submitted to Choi’s Permanent Stay hearing is a media report that includes the public statements made by then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull at the time of Choi’s arrest. Turnbull as good as pronounced Choi guilty, threatening anyone thinking of assisting North Korea that “the AFP [Australian Federal Police] will find you” and then ranting hysterically in connection with Choi’s arrest that, “North Korea is a dangerous, reckless, criminal regime threatening the peace of the region. It supports itself by breaching UN sanctions, not simply by selling commodities like coal and other goods, but also by selling weapons, by selling drugs, by engaging in cyber crime.” Needless to say, when the then chief political officer of the country makes such highly publicised, extreme statements against Choi it is going to prejudice any jury that will sit on Choi’s trial.

There were also many additional reasons why Choi cannot get a fair trial that were not included in the formal Permanent Stay application. One of these is that the AFP or their sources (which could be ASIO, the Australian Signals Directorate, the CIA or the KCIA) apparently tampered with evidence submitted in the case. The apparent tampering of submitted documents does not directly affect the case against Choi. Rather, it covers up information that is extremely politically damaging to the Australian and U.S. regimes and even more destructive to the credibility of their South Korean allies (see below for further details). However, it shows that the evidence supplied in the case cannot be relied on. After all, if the AFP or their sources have secretly deleted politically embarrassing information (without putting any note stating that the information is redacted) from documentary evidence in one area, what other evidence have they tampered with? How can Choi get a fair trial if one can have little confidence in the authenticity of the evidence supplied in the case against him? In the next few weeks, we hope to be able to confirm with absolute certainty if there has been under-handed tampering of documents in the prosecution’s supplied evidence as almost certainly seems to be the case. Watch this space!

When one puts the numerous grounds for a Permanent Stay in the proceedings against Choi together, one gets a unified picture of why Chan Han Choi cannot get a fair trial. And this is because, from the prejudicing of any jury by the extremely hostile public statements against him made by the then prime minister at the time of his arrest, to the impeding of Choi’s access to lawyers, to the restriction of access to this very day of competent Korean-English interpreters, to the very limited and tardy legal aid funding for interpreters, to the efforts to break his spirit by blocking communication with his family, to the interception of Choi’s privileged direct and indirect communications with his legal representatives, to the apparent dirty tricks used to try and isolate Choi from both his lawyers and his supporters, to the denial of his bail application based on his political sympathy for the socialistic DPRK, Chan Han Choi has, because of his political loyalty to a socialistic state, faced blatant discrimination from the agencies of Australia’s capitalist state – the very state that is supposed to “fairly” adjudicate his case. If Choi’s Permanent Stay application was indeed adjudicated on fairly it would surely have succeeded.

However, the legal system that adjudicated on Choi’s Permanent Stay application is itself biased. As Trotskyist Platform spokesman, Samuel Kim, put it at a 23 November march through the centre of Sydney demanding freedom for Chan Han Choi:

“… this so-called justice system, is not just, it is unjust. The legal system at its core, is part of the ruling class’ machinery that works against the interests of the working class masses and their supporters. The state exists for the corporate bosses and capitalist investors… Whether it is the Liberals, the ALP or the Greens who are in office, it will always be a state for the capitalist rich ruling class.”

That is why business owners, from corporate bigwigs to restaurant and cafe owners – big and small alike – are able to get away with illegally underpaying their workers without facing any criminal punishments (and at most being hit with minor fines), while trade unionists who stand up staunchly for workers rights get hit with criminal convictions and exorbitant fines. This legal system that attacks those who stand up for the rights of workers is even more implacably hostile to those like Choi who stand up for workers states like the DPRK and the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). Meanwhile, since the courts are united with the other agencies of Australia’s state – the police, the military, the AFP, ASIS, ASIO, the DPP, the Australian Signals Directorate and the prisons – by a common subservience to the same wealthy capitalist class they also act as apologists for these other state organs. This was evident in a high-profile coroner’s report handed down exactly a week before Choi’s Permanent Stay application was held. The coroner’s report was into the death of 26 year-old Aboriginal prisoner, David Dungay. Dungay was killed by six prison guards four years ago at the very jail and the same wing of that jail where Choi is currently being held: the Hospital wing (which also serves as a remand jail) of Long Bay Prison. The guards caused Dungay’s death by crushing him with their combined weight and then continuing to choke him in this prone position as he cried out desperately more than a dozen times, “I can’t breathe!” Outrageously, the coroner recommended no criminal charges or any other sanction against any of the CSNSW officers who caused Dungay’s death. Similarly, the NSW Supreme Court judge who heard Choi’s Permanent Stay application grossly downplayed the harm done by the actions of CSNSW and the other regime agencies that have been violating the rights of Chan Han Choi.

Chan Han Choi’s Fate Will Be Decided by the
Outcome of the Clash of Political Forces

Like the other enforcement personnel of the capitalist state, magistrates and judges are tied by thousands of threads to the wealthy capitalist class. Magistrates and judges are themselves on very high salaries. Many of them no doubt invest part of these salaries in large shareholdings, in wealth management products indirectly investing in shares and in multiple investment properties. That means that their own economic interests lie very much with the interests of capital and against those like trade unionists who militantly stand up for workers rights. Having such interests would also make them especially hostile to states – like the DPRK – formed through the overthrow of capitalist rule. Moreover, a person could not rise to become a judge – especially a Supreme Court judge – unless they had already proven their loyalty to the capitalist order countless times on their way up. Then there are all the personal connections that tie the judiciary to the capitalist elite. Judges’ and magistrates’ connections to corporate bigwigs, ruling class politicians and the leaders of other state agencies are cemented through private school old boys networks, common membership of exclusive social and sports clubs, marriage, neighbourly relations in expensive suburbs and, in some cases, even through shared patronage of the same high-priced prostitutes.

We must add that in such high-stakes, high-profile, political cases like the one of Chan Han Choi’s, any judge sitting on the case is hardly going to make any key decisions by themselves. You can bet that influential capitalist billionaires, government leaders, heads of repressive agencies and other judges will be banging in their ears. Such interference in the case might take place casually during the course of, say, an extravagant dinner at an expensive restaurant. Or it might occur in a more deliberate manner through members of the ruling class elite specifically calling up the relevant judges or taking them “aside for a chat.” Think of how prime minister Scott Morrison rang up his mate – and former neighbour – NSW Police Commissioner, Mick Fuller to “enquire” about the police investigation into the alleged forging of documents by his energy minister, Angus Taylor … and multiply that by about a hundred! 

Since the Australian ruling class is determined to persecute Chan Han Choi, the pressure on the judge – and his own class instincts – will be toward ensuring that this occurs. However, that does not mean that Choi’s cause is hopeless. Choi has his support.  When the Australian authorities arrested Chan Han Choi nearly two years ago, Australian ruling circles expected that Choi’s imprisonment would meet with universal approval and that they could break Choi’s spirit by cruelly impeding his access to family, friends, lawyers and Korean-English interpreters. Instead, Chan Han Choi has defiantly spoken out from prison against the Australian regime’s violation of his human rights and has stuck by his political opposition to the cruel economic sanctions on the people of North Korea. What has really caught the Australian regime by surprise is the significant and growing support for Choi that has arisen both in Australia and around the world. Here in Sydney, Trotskyist Platform has been joined in the united front rallies to free Chan Han Choi and oppose the economic sanctions by a growing number of people. Among the organisations endorsing the street protests are groups as diverse as the Irish republican socialist group the James Connolly Association, Australia-DPRK Friendship Society, the Lebanese Communist Party, Communist Party of Australia – Western Sydney Branch, Aust-DPRK Solidarity, Young Communists – Western Sydney and most recently the Social Justice Network, a multi-racial progressive group with a strong base amongst refugees and migrants from the Middle East and South Asia. Alongside the street protests in defence of Choi, his supporters, from Australia to as far away as Genoa, Italy have been making and wearing T-shirts calling to “Free Chan Han Choi – A Socialist Political Prisoner in Australia.” Other individuals and groups have expressed their solidarity with Choi on social media. Despite Choi’s supporters in Sydney facing intimidation and surveillance from the repressive agencies of the Australian regime, just prior to Choi’s Permanent Stay hearing we held our fourth street demonstration in solidarity with Choi. Six days earlier, we boisterously marched through the streets of Sydney city chanting, “Chan Han Choi – Free This Hero Now!” and “Free Chan Choi – Lift the Sanctions Now!”

23 November 2019, Sydney: Supporters of Chan Han Choi gather for a united-front protest march to demand his freedom and the lifting of the UN sanctions on North Korea.

What this solidarity movement means is that the more the Australian regime continues with its persecution of Choi, the greater the political cost it will suffer. Its pretensions of being “democratic” will be exposed, the cruelty of the sanctions regime on the DPRK that it supports will be highlighted and the nature of the Australian regime as a dictatorship of the big end of town will be bared for all to see. In the end, influential members of the capitalist ruling elite will have to decide whether their hostility to Choi and what they gain in persecuting him is worth the political cost of conducting this persecution. In other words, Chan Han Choi’s fate will mostly not be decided by points of law and evidence presented in the courtroom but by the clash of forces in the political arena. The more that we can increase the political cost of attacking Choi for Australia’s racist rich people’s regime the more chance we have in forcing them to back off from their completely unjust persecution.

Why the Ruling Class Is So Hell Bent on Persecuting Chan Han Choi

As Choi has himself told his supporters, the ferocity of the Australian rulers’ persecution of him represents a channelling of all their hostility to the DPRK onto Choi. So why is the Australian regime so hostile to the DPRK? To the imperialist ruling classes of the likes of the U.S., Australia and Japan the existence of states created by anti-capitalist revolutions in the DPRK and in its massive neighbour and ally China (as well as in Cuba, Vietnam and Laos) are simply unbearable. For the existence of these socialistic states means that there is a chunk of the world where these imperialists cannot exploit workers, plunder natural resources and dominate markets the way that they do in most of the rest of the world. Moreover, the imperialists fear that the existence of independent, socialistic countries in the Asia-Pacific could embolden the masses of the countries in this region bullied by capitalist powers to think that they too should give the imperialists the boot and take up the socialist path. The Australian imperialists fear that if the PRC continues to grow stronger and if the DPRK is allowed to do so, the masses of PNG, East Timor, Fiji, the Philippines and Indonesia will be encouraged to defy their Australian neocolonial oppressors. Furthermore, the mere presence of workers states sets off the most mortal fear of capitalist rulers: that their own working class will be inspired by this to one day sweep them away from power.

The capitalist rulers have specific reasons for wanting to persecute Chan Han Choi. For one, by prosecuting Choi on charges of violating the sanctions on the DPRK, the Australian rulers hope to intimidate anyone thinking of assisting the people of North Korea. Alongside its U.S. senior partner, the Australian imperialists have been amongst the most rabid supporters of the sanctions. Australian ships and maritime surveillance aircraft are currently deployed in the waters off Korea helping the U.S. to enforce these sanctions. These sanctions are aimed at arm-twisting the people of North Korea to kowtow to the imperialist powers, abandon their socialistic system and allow Western, Japanese and South Korean speculators, bankers and sweatshop bosses to take over her economy, plunder her natural resources and turn her well educated workforce into a big labour pool to be exploited. For the capitalist ruling classes of the U.S., Australia and Japan, the terrible hardships and shortages of medicine and food that the sanctions inflict on the people of “North Korea” are just “collateral damage” in the pursuit of their “higher” purpose of … greater profits!

The Australian regime’s arrest and demonisation of Choi was also aimed at fuelling the launch of their new Cold War witch hunt against supporters of socialistic states. Choi’s arrest came just as the main weapons in this latest Cold War were being set for blast off. The number one target of this Cold War – which has seen the mainstream media and government launch one anti-China attack after another – are supporters of socialistic China. Any Chinese international student who speaks out in support of the PRC and any prominent Chinese immigrant who refuses to condemn the PRC could get witch-hunted. However, supporters of the DPRK – which is the PRC’s ally and neighbour – like Choi are also naturally targeted. The persecution of Choi has both added to the anti-communist hysteria targeting supporters of Red China and has been in turn bolstered by this anti-PRC Cold War. Just four days ago, the Morrison government announced the granting of yet more tens of millions of dollars for ASIO so that this sinister spy agency could establish a new taskforce against supposed [mythical] “foreign interference” by China. Pro-communist activists, pro-PRC Chinese international students and other supporters of Red China will be the real target.

The purposes behind this anti-communist witch hunting are to justify to the public increased military mobilisation behind the U.S.-led war drive against the PRC and DPRK, to justify support for anti-communist forces within China – like the pro-colonial, rich kid rioters in Hong Kong – and to crush opposition at home to the Australian regime’s anti-PRC policies. The effect of this Cold War drive has been to whip up a national security obsession so intense that it has ended up targeting people who are in no way supporters of socialistic states. Thus, although Witness K is certainly no red, the Cold War-derived national security fixation has certainly rebounded against him. So even though Witness K was first raided by ASIO in 2013, the Commonwealth DPP only actually decided to charge him in mid-2018, six months after the arrest of Choi and as the witch hunt against supporters of Red China was quickly intensifying. Many others have also been submerged in the national security tide. These including David McBride, the military lawyer who exposed horrific war crimes by Australian special forces troops in Afghanistan. Even mainstream journalists, who have done so much to whip up the anti-China hysteria, have been subjected to AFP raids on the rare occasions that they actually do a decent investigative report that holds Australian regime institutions to account.

Parallel with the Cold War witch hunt that has targeted Chan Han Choi and pro-Red China Chinese students and migrants has been increased persecution of trade unionists. Anti-union laws have curtailed the right to strike and have led to repeated fines and prosecutions of scores of representatives of construction workers’ unions. Despite a recent parliamentary setback, the right-wing Coalition government continues to try and push through its Ensuring Integrity Bill, extreme legislation that will make it easier for the government to deregister militant trade unions and drive out staunch unionists from leadership positions. It is little surprise that Cold War witch-hunting and union-busting are going hand in hand. That is what happened in the last Cold War against the Soviet Union too. Both attacks on workers’ economic defence organisations – like our trade unions – and attacks on workers states are driven by the interests of the capitalist ruling class. And the more that the capitalist system is unable to ensure secure, permanent jobs for workers, the more that it can’t provide affordable rental accommodation and rising wages, the more we see that the ruling class fears the presence of both militant unions and socialistic states. That is why it is in the interests of the entire workers movement to oppose the Cold War anti-communist witch-hunting. Let us demand: Down with the attacks on our unions, down with the attacks on supporters of socialistic states! Stop the persecution of pro-Red China Chinese immigrants and international students! Stop the persecution of Chan Han Choi – free him now! Dump the anti-“foreign interference” laws and taskforces!

Fraudulent Nature of “Rule of Law” in “Liberal-Democratic” Australia
Gets Exposed

In pursuing their persecution of Chan Han Choi, Australia’s capitalist rulers are paying a considerable political price. Due to his own defiant statements from prison (see for example:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTlumqtaguo) and the efforts of his growing band of supporters, more and more people are hearing about the harsh conditions of Choi’s imprisonment. As a result, an increasing number of people are seeing the hypocrisy of the ruling class’ claims to run a “liberal-democracy” committed to “human rights.” Meanwhile, the fact that the Prosecution successfully opposed his bail in good part based on his stated political sympathies for the DPRK – as opposed to just his alleged deeds – has helped to shatter the myth that Australia is a country where everyone is treated equally before the law regardless of their political allegiances.

All this hurts the ruling class’ predatory machinations abroad. Like its U.S. senior partner, the Australian ruling class often uses the guise of defending “human rights” to intervene in countries abroad. In particular, they cynically wield the club of “human rights” to attack socialistic China and the DPRK itself. Right now Australia’s rulers, including prime minister Scott Morrison, are berating China for allegedly violating the rights of an Australian detained in China on espionage charges, Yang Hengjun. Recently, Yang’s supporters have made many unsubstantiated claims that have been reported as fact by the mainstream media. Yet, the truth is that Chan Han Choi has faced far harsher conditions than what is actually confirmed about the detention of Yang Hengjun. Yang has been restricted by China’s authorities for the last 11 months, while Chan Han Choi has been imprisoned for the last 24 months without going to trial. Notably, while Yang Hengjun spent the first six months that he was held in the comparatively comfortable conditions of house arrest (he was only moved to a detention facility in mid July), Choi has spent the entire 24 months imprisoned in harsh conditions in various Sydney prisons, the last 20 months of which has been in one of the Australian regime’s most notorious prison camps, Long Bay jail. Australia’s foreign minister, Marise Payne, has accused China’s authorities of restricting Yang Hengjun’s access to lawyers and family. Yet Yang Hengjun has at least been allowed regular visits by Australian embassy officials and his court appointed lawyer. However, Chan Han Choi, following an initial visit from a lawyer soon after his arrest, underwent an approximately 50 day period when he was prevented from having visits from anyone at all – whether they be lawyers, family or friends. And until just three months ago, Choi’s access to his lawyers was largely obstructed and his access to competent language interpreters remains effectively blocked to this very day. Of course, we should note that there is no equivalence in the political essence of the cases of Yang and Choi. Yang is accused of espionage against the Peoples Republic of China, which if true is a crime against a workers state that deserves stiff punishment. Even if he turns out to be innocent of the accusations he is no hero whatsoever. In contrast, even if the accusations against Choi turn out to be true, this would only make Choi an even greater hero. For it would mean that he has taken great risks to both help a people battered by cruel sanctions and to stand by a workers state based on public ownership – thus standing by the interests of the more than 90% of Australia’s and the world’s population whose interests lie in the success of socialistic states.

Choi’s continued opposition to the UN sanctions on North Korea in his brave statements from prison and the solidarity movement defending him have combined to invigorate opposition to these sanctions within Australia. Thus, although the Australian regime hoped to use the arrest and demonisation of Choi to justify these imperialist sanctions, the movement against this persecution has actually resulted in there now being more understanding of the cruelty and injustice of these sanctions amongst politically aware working class activists than there was previously. Indeed, as a result of discussions with Choi, who is known affectionately as “Uncle Choi” amongst fellow prisoners, even some inmates at Long Bay jail now see the unfairness of these sanctions.

Moreover, Choi’s persecution, his statements from prison and the impact of the movement defending him have all combined to give some leftist and union activists a better understanding of the DPRK. This, actually, began to take place when Choi was first arrested. Politically astute people who had previously been swayed by the intense media propaganda against North Korea asked themselves, why would a person who grew up in capitalist South Korea and who has then lived for three decades in relatively wealthy Australia want to volunteer his time and risk his freedom to help North Korea? Later people pondering this question heard Choi’s own statements from prison about why he likes North Korea: in other countries that he has lived in – like South Korea, Australia and Singapore – it is “money first and if you have money you can do everything”, whereas in North Korea it is “not about money”, “money is not important” it is “humans and humanism that is first” (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro3RkGojbgY). He also speaks of how the genuineness of North Korea’s people gives him a “heart-warming feeling.” Conditioned by the natural empathy that warm-hearted humans have for those doing it hard – and especially for those stripped of their rights – some people who heard these statements from prison were profoundly affected by them. Then these people heard the points raised by activists in the campaign to free Choi. We in Trotskyist Platform, for instance, stressed that while the DPRK is not the “ideal” form of a workers state (nor could a workers state strangled by extreme sanctions and intense military pressure exist for long in any kind of “ideal” form) – in that the basic socialist system there is deformed by a level of material privileges for state officials, a personality cult around the Kim family and a lack of genuine workers councils-based democracy – the entire basis of Western regimes’ hostility to the DPRK is that her system is based on the toiling classes having seized state power from the capitalists and landlords. We emphasised that the fact that the North Korean masses have built a society based on public ownership – an ownership form that favours working class people – is a victory for working class people all around the world. So today, several astute leftists who had been agnostic in their attitude to the DPRK prior to Choi’s arrest have now become sympathetic to this socialistic state.

Meanwhile, a significant chunk of the Korean community in Australia has become sympathetic to Choi. This, of course, includes the section of the Korean community already supportive of the DPRK. But it also includes others. Those working-class Korean migrants who have copped the racism of capitalist Australia, discrimination in employment and the general hardships of the migrant experience feel a natural sympathy for a working class Korean-Australian compatriot who has been languishing in prison for two years and who has been denied basic rights. Many Koreans too remember or have heard about the horrors of the military dictatorships that ran capitalist South Korea in the not too distant past and understand all too well how hostility to North Korea was a key rationale for these murderous dictatorships. So, when they see a person thrown in jail for supporting North Korea it sets alarm bells ringing. For politically aware Koreans it is obvious too that enmity to North Korea is the justification used for the presence of tens of thousands of U.S. troops in South Korea. For the many migrants from South Korea hostile to the presence of the U.S. troops and who don’t want Washington, Seoul and Canberra to unleash a new war with their compatriots in the North, any demonisation of North Korea and its supporters is met with hostility. As a result we have been contacted by Korean migrants sympathetic to Choi. Many are scared to too openly take a stand out of fear of deportation from Australia or persecution by authorities in South Korea when they return there to see family and friends.  Nevertheless, the significant support that exists for Choi in the Korean community is confirmed by the reality that while the English language mainstream media have been hostile to Choi – to more or lesser degrees – the main Korean-language community paper in Australia, Hanho Daily, has reported on the case fairly and with compassion for Choi (see: http://www.hanhodaily.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=61930). Meanwhile, sections of the Chinese language media are also moving to cover Choi’s case in an accurate way (see for example: https://www.sydneytoday.com/content-101948458527050). This reflects the understanding of some in the pro-PRC section of the Chinese community that the persecution of Choi is an extreme form of the Cold War-style hostility that they are enduring in greater and greater amounts every day.

Facing suspicion about their prosecution of Chan Han Choi from the Australian Korean and Chinese communities, exposure of the hypocrisy of their claims to stand for “human rights” and growing opposition to their hostile policy against the DPRK – and, in particular, their enforcement of cruel sanctions on North Korea’s people – the Australian ruling class could also be hit by an X-factor that could take the political damage that they suffer from their persecution of Choi to a new level. This X-factor has appeared in the case in a partly accidental manner. For amongst the documents that have been provided as evidence by the Prosecution – obtained through spying on Choi’s communications – are E-mails that show that a company acting for the South Korean government once agreed to buy coal at inflated prices from North Korea. This was as compensation for falsely blaming North Korea for the sinking of a South Korean warship in 2010. To understand the gigantic significance of this we need to go back to 26 March 2010 when the ROKS Cheonan sunk in contested waters near North Korea during the course of joint military exercises between the U.S., South Korea and other allied countries. Forty-six South Korean naval personnel were killed as a result. The South Korean Ministry of Defense stated in the first press briefings after the sinking that there was “no indication of North Korean involvement.” Yet, before long a joint investigation carried out by a hand-picked team from South Korea, the U.S., Australia, the U.K. and Canada “concluded” that the warship was sunk by a North Korean torpedo. However, those findings were highly controversial and most South Koreans at the time saw the findings as a crazy conspiracy theory. One of the South Korean investigators on the panel, Shin Sang-cheol even asserted that “evidence linking the North to the torpedo was tampered with.” Chemical and seismic data studies conducted by separate teams of international scientists also concluded that a torpedo could not have been responsible for the sinking of the Cheonan. North Korea itself vehemently denied the accusation. It offered to aid an open investigation but was knocked back. China also rejected the Western-South Korean account as lacking factual basis. Nevertheless, the accusation that North Korea sunk the Cheonan brought the Korean Peninsula to the very brink of a full-scale war. It also led to the increased isolation of North Korea and the heightening of economic sanctions against her by many countries.

The remains of the South Korean warship the ROKS Cheonan which sunk in contested waters near North Korea during the course of joint military exercises between the U.S., South Korea and other allied countries. After initially saying that North Korea was not responsible, the South Korean military backed up by the U.S. and Australian rulers blamed North Korea for the ship sinking. However, documents submitted by the prosecution in Choi’s case happen to show that South Korea once agreed to buy coal at inflated prices from North Korea, in a deal that was apparently compensation for the harm to North Korea done by falsely blaming her for the Cheonan sinking.

Fast forward five years and the then South Korean government of Park Geun-hye finally makes an overture to ease tense relations between the two Koreas. However, North Korea demands compensation from the South for falsely blaming her for the Cheonan sinking and for all the resulting harm and intensification of sanctions that this brought her. In a deal that was actually brokered by Chan Han Choi, himself, South Korea was to buy coal from North Korea at substantially higher than market price as their means of providing compensation. Initially, a private company acting for the South Korean government, G Hanshin Pty Ltd, actually did agree to buy North Korean coal at inflated prices. Although the deal was later cancelled after South Korea suddenly insisted on the market price, the fact that South Korea once agreed to buy North Korean coal at inflated prices is strong evidence backing claims that Seoul knew that the North did not sink the Cheonan and, therefore, that North Korea was entitled to compensation for the false accusation.

Things get still more interesting. Although Choi was not charged by the AFP for that April 2015 attempted coal deal with the South Korean government, the AFP decided to use this attempted deal as part of their evidence. They submit it as part of showing how Choi is a “Loyal Agent of the DPRK” and asserting his role as a “DPRK Broker.” This evidence that they submit includes draft contracts sent to Choi by the South Korean company that was assigned to conduct the deal with North Korea. Yet there is a strange thing about this evidence submitted by the AFP. In the section of the contracts (written in Korean) where the price is to be listed, there is a “US$” written but then a blank space. The price is not there! We are pouring through documents to be absolutely sure of this but at this stage it appears almost certain that either the AFP or their source (which could be any number of Australian or U.S. or South Korean intelligence agencies) deleted this price from the contracts that they submitted as evidence in the case against Choi. Choi’s supporters maintain that if the initial agreement by South Korea to buy coal at an inflated price from North Korea amounts to smoking gun proof that South Korea knew that North Korea did not sink the Cheonan and was entitled to compensation for the false accusation against her, any secret deletion of the [inflated] price from the evidence presented by the Prosecution represents North Korea’s enemies being caught trying to wipe their dirty fingers off the smoking gun!

Just as the revelation that the claim that “Iraq has weapons of massive destruction” – that was used to justify the 2003 U.S./British/Australia invasion of Iraq – was false hurt the political credibility of the U.S., British and Australian regimes, irrefutable evidence that North Korea was blamed falsely for the sinking of the Cheonan will also hurt the U.S. and Australian ruling classes. This is particularly the case since not only the U.S. imperialists but their Australian junior partner were involved in the bogus “investigation” into the Cheonan sinking. However, should it be irrefutably proven that not only did North Korea not sink the warship but South Korea knew that it did not, the impact on South Korean political life would be on an entirely other level. Here the X in the X-factor would stand for X-plosive! For the false assertion that North Korea sunk the Cheonan has shaped South Korean political life almost to the same degree that the September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centre shaped American politics. It helped condition the greatly increased hostility to the DPRK within South Korea over the ensuing years, the heightening of sanctions and the growth of hard right political forces within South Korea. If it comes out irrefutably that this is based entirely on lies and that the masses of South Korea have been blatantly lied to this could cause a huge political earthquake there that could shake the very foundations of the South Korean capitalist regime. And ironically, the Australian regime’s persecution of Choi would be blamed for triggering this crisis by their allies in Seoul!

Whatever transpires regarding revelations about the truth about the Cheonan sinking, one thing is clear: the more that the campaign to free Chan Han Choi grows in strength the greater the political price that the Australian capitalist regime that is persecuting him will pay. And we in Trotskyist Platform – and we dare say many of the others involved in the campaign to free Choi – are determined to maximise that political cost. For we understand that we cannot expect Choi to get a fair trial from the racist, rich people’s legal system – even under the unfair laws that Choi has been charged with. Only by mobilising mass actions in defence of Choi and against the sanctions on North Korea can we create an environment where it will be against the political interests of the capitalist regime and its various agencies to continue their persecution of Choi. Moreover, a key part of the struggle to advance the interests of the working class and downtrodden is to expose to the masses the truth that the repressive agencies in this country are not “democratic” institutions that treat everyone equally but exist for the very purpose of maintaining a capitalist “order” that subjugates the working class masses. All supporters of the working class and downtrodden: Let us work harder to free Chan Han Choi! Oppose the Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic North Korea and socialistic China! Say NO to the new McCarthyism! Struggle against the starvation UN sanctions on the people of North Korea! Expose the truth about the Cheonan sinking! Stand by the DPRK and PRC workers states!

释放Chan Han Choi – 一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

释放Chan Han Choi  –
一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

2019年11月23日,集会,在悉尼的唐人街:
释放Chan Han Choi – 一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!
Libido is never constant; it varies no prescription cialis over the course of life. The profile looks cialis 40 mg just like any other you’ve visited on the social network. What’s left are lower fat foods like most fruits, veggies, soy protein, nuts, cheapest viagra canada bran. A few companies will cheap tadalafil pills ask for you to print out your order form and send cash for your order to be sent.

反抗对亲中华人社区的种族主义、扣“赤色分子”帽子式的政治迫害!
为营救澳州政治犯社会主义者Chan Han Choi而斗争!
抵制对左派进行新的冷战政治迫害的黑流!

2019年11月28日: 今天, 华人社区中的亲华群体不仅面临着重新兴起的针对这个国家所有有色人的白澳种族主义, 而且还面临着在正在出现的新冷战时期对社会主义中国支持者的政治迫害环境下的特意污蔑。

澳大利亚正在出现的冷战政治迫害开始扩大, 已经不仅仅针对中国的支持者。这一点在澳大利亚亲朝鲜的社会主义政治犯Chan Han Choi的案件中很为明显。在过去23个月中, 他被无耻地拒绝保释, 部分原因是他是朝鲜支持者, 对此,检方声称这意味着他对澳大利亚没有忠诚。因此, 就像诽谤亲华学生一样, 又发生了人们因赞同或同情社会主义国家而被剥夺权利的案件。

Choi是一名澳大利亚公民,从韩国移民过来差不多已经有31年了。Choi被指控违反联合国经济制裁,帮助朝鲜出口物资。尽管当局在严酷的条件下拘禁他,但他仍然蔑视并要做“无罪”辩护。即使这些针对Choi的指控证实属实,但从工人阶级的角度来看,他当然不是罪犯。恰恰相反!如果Choi确实试图通过交易来帮助朝鲜,这只会证明他冒着巨大的个人风险来帮助朝鲜人民,他们正经受着没有任何其他国家经受过的最严厉的摧残式制裁。 Choi反对制裁不仅基于他的人道主义,而且基于他对朝鲜社会的平等主义和社区精神的热爱。无论人们如何看待朝鲜的某个特别领导人,朝鲜都是一个以所有主要银行,工业,农业用地和矿山的集体所有制为基础的工人国家。在支持这种基于公有制的社会主义国家的过程中,Choi和所有遭受以资本主义私有制为主的经济而带来的痛苦的澳大利亚人的利益是一致的。他和遭受资本主义社会造成的种族主义暴力和虐待的澳大利亚原住民以及亚洲,穆斯林和非洲少数民族社区是站在一起的。所以澳大利亚和世界的工人阶级有必要支持Chan Han Choi。我们现在必须要求清除对他所有指控。

除了拒绝Choi保释外,澳大利亚政府还限制支持者访问他,切断他的电话,阻止他的儿子去监狱里探望他,并阻止他的律师去访问。剥夺他的权利以及基于他对朝鲜的支持而否决他的保释是澳大利亚新兴的冷战式政治迫害社会主义国家支持者的一部分。这种逐渐侵入的麦卡锡主义也出现在澳大利亚华人社区的成员和中国国际学生中,他们被澳大利亚国家和媒体妖魔化,只是为了他们对红色中国的同情, 现在也受到了迫害 。

世界各地的所有人都反对帝国主义的欺凌行为,那些代表基于社会主义公有制的制度的人和反对冷战式政治迫害左翼的人有必要参加竞选活动,以要求释放Chan Han Choi。我们还有必要与Choi一起反对资本主义大国,利用制裁来对朝鲜人民进行经济恐吓,使他们默许资本主义征服,以及亿万富翁,西方银行家,房地产投机商和血汗工厂老板的收购。帝国主义对朝鲜的压力最终也是为了破坏其邻国和盟国中国的社会主义政权。

Australian Regime Rejects Bail for Leftist Political Prisoner!

Australian Regime Rejects Bail for Leftist Political Prisoner!
Free Pro-DPRK Socialist Chan Han Choi!

22 October 2019: Last Friday, NSW Supreme Court Judge Lonergan rejected a bail application made by a political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi. Choi has been imprisoned for the last 22 months for his sympathies for the socialistic DPRK, the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (i.e. “North Korea”). For most of that time he has been imprisoned at Long Bay jail – one of the Australian regime’s most notorious prison camps. On 29 December 2015, in the very same section of Long Bay where Choi is imprisoned – the Prison Hospital/remand centre – Aboriginal prisoner, David Dungay, was killed by six members of the prison riot squad. The heavy set guards crushed Dungay with their combined weight while dismissing Dungay’s repeated desperate cries of “I can’t breathe” as the 26 year-old Dunghutti man gasped for breath. Nearly four years on, the family of David Dungay still have not received any justice, with the coroner only handing down his findings next month. The same racist, rich people’s regime in this country that commits such brutal oppression of Aboriginal people and which oversees the exploitation of the working class by the big end of town has trampled on the rights of Chan Han Choi for nearly two years. Their rejection of Choi’s bail bid is just the latest example of this.

Chan Han Choi is awaiting trial, scheduled to take place next year, on charges of trying to broker deals to enable the people of the DPRK to evade crippling United Nations economic sanctions on that country. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Moreover, even the police acknowledge that none of the deals actually went through. Indeed, even their own allegations admit that most of the alleged deals were abandoned by Choi himself or by his alleged DPRK suppliers before police arrested Choi. However, even if he did try to broker deals to help the DPRK export its produce in violation of these sanctions, that would be no crime whatsoever from the standpoint of the working class. In fact, this  would make him an even bigger hero. For as Choi himself stated in a courageous message made from prison: “The United Nations economic sanctions that have been imposed on North Korea are both unjust and unfair.” They prohibit more than 90% of North Korea’s exports as well as import of many key items. As a small country whose land is dominated by steep mountains and harsh winters, the DPRK has always needed to export in order to provide enough food for its population. The prohibition of almost all of North Korea’ exports are, thus, causing shortages of food and medicine for her people. Similar sanctions imposed on Iraq caused the deaths of over 500,000 babies in just the first eight years of their implementation from 1990 onwards. Although the DPRK’s socialistic system has enabled her to avert such catastrophic consequences, the sanctions still cause terrible hardship to her people.

Secondly, the idea that the U.S., Australian and other Western imperialists should get the UN to sanction the DPRK under the pretext of opposing its development of a nuclear deterrence is, frankly, obscene. The U.S. has over 6,000 nuclear warheads, France 300 and Britain 200, whereas the DPRK is said to possess just 30 such warheads (see:  https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat) and their capability has not been extensively tested at all. Moreover, North Korea has never unleashed nuclear weapons on human beings before. It was the U.S. imperialists who did that, cheered on by their Australian junior partners, when they heinously dropped atomic bombs on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. As for the notion pushed by the imperial powers that North Korea is particularly “dangerous” and thus should be especially prevented from acquiring a nuclear capability, one has only to note that it is not North Korea that destroyed Iraq and killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people. No, that was the work of the U.S., British and Australian regimes in their two invasions of Iraq, first in 1991 and then from 2003 onwards. Nor was it North Korea who killed tens of thousands of civilians in Afghanistan including through airstrikes on wedding parties, civilian convoys and hospitals. No, those crimes were committed by the U.S., NATO and Australian forces. The latter (as we are finally starting to hear more details of) killed several Afghan children, executed in cold blood many civilians and murdered unarmed prisoners. The U.S. and NATO got together too – with the assistance of the joint U.S.-Australia spy base at Pine Gap – to devastate Serbia in 1999 and then pummel Libya in 2011 – an onslaught that not only killed tens of thousands of Libyan people but which has left that once peaceful country mired in bloodshed and chaos ever since. North Korea had absolutely nothing to do with those calamities. Yet despite all this, the capitalist powers single out North Korea as the supposedly dangerously reckless country whose people must be ground down with sanctions until she disarms.

The real reason that the DPRK is being targeted is that the imperialist powers that instigated the sanctions regime want to bring down a state that dares to defy their colonial diktats. Furthermore, they want to target the DPRK because it is a socialistic state. They know too that by turning the vice on the DPRK they can also squeeze her neighbour and ally, the Peoples Republic of China – the world’s most powerful socialistic state.  Although the workers states in North Korea and China are bureaucratically deformed and in the latter case weakened also by a significant degree of capitalist intrusion – the existence of states created by anti-capitalist revolutions remain an obstacle to the rich capitalist powers exploiting the masses there the way that they super-exploit the peoples of Indonesia, the Philippines, Bangladesh, Mexico and other ex-colonies. Moreover, the Western powers fear that if the workers states in Cuba, China, North Korea, Vietnam and Laos are allowed to thrive then that would encourage the masses in other former colonies – including the ones raped by Australian corporate bigwigs like PNG, Fiji, East Timor and Indonesia – to have their own revolutions to kick out their imperialist overlords and the corrupt local capitalist ruling classes allied with them.  

Put simply, the socialistic rule, in however an imperfect form, which exists in North Korea and China is bad for the interests of the 5 to 10% of the Australian population that make up the capitalist upper class. However, it is very much in the interests of the vast majority of this country’s – and indeed the world’s – population; that is of the working class and all but the most privileged layers of the middle class. The existence of workers states in North Korea, China, Cuba and Co. can only give encouragement to the struggles for justice of the working class and oppressed in capitalist countries like Australia. It gives the masses here the understanding that capitalist rule is not inevitable and does not need to be put up with. The existence of states with economies centred on public ownership shows working class people that it is possible to have a system based not on the ownership of banks, mines, factories, agricultural land and transport and communications infrastructure by a small class of wealthy private individuals but on common socialist ownership of these means of production by all the people. In China, 70 years of a system where state-owned enterprises continue to play the backbone role has seen the country achieve poverty reduction unheard of in all human history. In North Korea, the system of public ownership of all the main means of production is a great conquest for the masses so that when the crippling sanctions are lifted, when the crushing military vice that she is ensnared in is loosened and when her system of socialist ownership is supplemented by workers democracy, it will enable her people to flourish. This is proven by the achievements made in North Korea in the first decades after the U.S., Australian, South Korean and other capitalist militaries heinously incinerated her cities and killed millions of her people during the 1950-53 Korean War. In those decades after the Korean War, when the former USSR provided the DPRK with a military shield against further imperialist attack, the DPRK – despite (like the PRC) not having the benefit of real workers democracy administering the workers state – was able to achieve tremendous advances in health care, literacy, access to cultural facilities, women’s rights and industrial development.

By opposing the UN economic sanctions on North Korea, Chan Han Choi is standing not only by her people but by the working class majority of Australia and the world. In standing by a system where public ownership plays the dominant role, which is necessarily counterposed to the capitalist system of big end of town-ownership, Choi is, in effect, standing by everyone who has suffered from the job losses, rising prices and deterioration in services that came with rampant privatisation in this country. He is standing by the many, many people still stuck for years on Australian public housing waiting lists or who are paying too high rents in the private sector because governments here have sold off so much public housing. He is standing by the many people who don’t have a secure job or, indeed, any job at all because of the relentless capitalist drive for higher profits in this country; that is, Chan Han Choi is standing by the young workers forced to work as casuals or on short term contracts and by the workers laid off by greedy private corporations or by state utilities overseen by the Australian capitalist state, alike. And since the system of capitalism is the root cause of the heightening racism in this country, Choi’s support for a state counterposed to capitalism puts him on the side of the Aboriginal people facing ever more vicious racist oppression and with the Muslim, Chinese, Sudanese and other non-white communities in Australia being stigmatised today. So, we should all in turn stand by socialist political prisoner Chan Han Choi. Let us mobilise in mass actions to demand the dropping of all charges against Chan Han Choi and the lifting of all UN economic sanctions on the socialistic DPRK.

It’s About Economic Sanctions on the People of North Korea and
Not About Weapons of Mass Destruction

An Australian citizen who migrated from South Korea 32 years ago, Choi began volunteering his services as a trade representative for North Korea more than a dozen years ago. He accomplished some pretty big deals that earnt the people of North Korea badly needed hard currency in the years before progressively tightening sanctions on the DPRK restricted legal trade. According to the AFP’s own “Statement of Facts”, two 2008 deals alone, for the export of iron ore and coal from North Korea, brought in $1.3 million. Despite legally bringing in large sums of money for the people of North Korea, Choi himself lived a humble life. The police note that at the time of his arrest he had no property in Australia and only $6,000 in savings. He lived in a modest rented home in Eastwood and worked as a hospital cleaner earning just around $750 a week. His brokering work was done not for any personal gain but out of a humanitarian impulse to help the DPRK’s people and out of political solidarity with the DPRK.

The AFP allege that after the sanctions restricted most of the DPRK’s exports, Choi continued to attempt to broker the sale of DPRK commodities. Most of the charges against him relate to alleged attempts to export coal or iron ore from the DPRK to entities in third countries including Indonesia, Vietnam and South Korea. However, the Australian government have tried to hype up the case as one of a Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) matter by focusing on one of the charges which alleges that Choi tried to broker the sale of North Korean short-range missiles. This charge of “Providing Services for WMD Program” is highly misleading as Choi is not even alleged to have tried to broker the sale of any WMD material – like nuclear, chemical or biological weapons. Moreover, this charge is based on the most tenuous of claims. Even the AFP’s allegations acknowledge that the alleged negotiations to sell the missiles was cancelled due to “machinations internal to the DPRK” – in other words, even the AFP have to accept that the alleged plan was scrapped at Choi’s end. This ending of the alleged plan occurred some three and a half months before Choi was arrested. When Choi was arrested, even if one believes the AFP’s claims, there was no attempt to sell short-range missiles taking place at all.

Yet the Australian government and the AFP have played up this charge related to short-range missiles, which is basically an accusation of a thought crime, in order to distract from the fact that Choi’s imprisonment is really a matter about the cruel economic sanctions on the people of North Korea. The mainstream media have played their part in this diversion. News reports last year stated that Choi was accused of helping to import materials for the DPRK’s WMD program. Yet the AFP do not even allege this. Indeed, all the allegations against Choi relate not to import of material to the DPRK but to export of items from there, with the sole exception of a more recently imposed charge that Choi tried to arrange the import of petroleum products to the DPRK. To try to get WMD’s into the picture the AFP have to do some rather extreme stretching of their “evidence.” For example, they claim that a five minute DPRK propaganda video which Choi E-mailed the link of to an associate was evidence that Choi was advertising the DPRK’s weapons … since the political propaganda video happened to include the firing of missiles!

To be sure, it is not wrong for an embattled workers state – especially when it is facing sanctions so crippling that it threatens to cause the starvation of some of her people – to try and raise some badly needed funds through weapons sales. It should be noted that the AFP’s rather flimsy allegations about Choi attempting to broker weapons sales claim that his brokering activities took place in a period when the sanctions had reached ultra-severe levels and when Donald Trump was threatening the people of North Korea with “fire and fury like the world has never seen.” Moreover, it is the height of hypocrisy for the Australian regime to be repressing others for allegedly selling weapons. The right-wing Coalition has openly proclaimed its intention to make Australia a top ten global arms exporter. Meanwhile, as an exposé by the Guardian revealed, Australian company Electro Optics Systems (EOS) has shipped large quantities of weapons to the militaries of Saudi Arabia and the UAE – the very militaries which have been spearheading the brutal Saudi-led war on Yemen that has killed over 100,000 people, displaced another three million people and brought mass starvation in what is today the world’s worst humanitarian disaster (see: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jul/25/australian-weapons-shipped-to-saudi-and-uae-as-war-rages-in-yemen). Among the weapons that Canberra allows EOS to sell to the murderous Saudi and UAE militaries is the R400s weapons station for remotely operating missile launchers and cannons.

Confused by all the hype surrounding the tenuous claims that Choi tried to broker the sale of North Korean missiles, a couple of Australian Chinese-language community newspapers erroneously headlined that Choi is accused of selling weapons to Taiwan. This is because the individual dealer whom the police alleged Choi negotiated with to arrange the sale to happened to be based in Taiwan. However, this person, one Raymond Chao, has no connection whatsoever with the Taiwanese government and the police themselves allege that “CHAO desired to obtain missiles and missile technology through the offices of the Accused and to produce and sell these missiles around the world” – in other words, not at all to the Taiwanese government. When Choi heard about these incorrect headlines he was upset as they mis-represented his political stance which includes strong sympathy for the Peoples Republic of China. Therefore, Choi asked his supporters to broadcast the following statement:

  • That he, Chan Han Choi is a strong supporter of the PRC, which is a longtime friend of the DPRK.
  • That he has never had any dealings with the Taiwanese government whatsoever.
  • That any discussions he has had about commercial deals between the DPRK and entities in Taiwan have been with non-government individuals who have no connections, whatsoever, to the government of Taiwan.
  • That he, Chan Han Choi, strongly believes in one China.
  • That he opposes all weapons sales to the Taiwanese regime and has never himself tried to sell to this regime.
There are other several causes of tinnitus and you would need a very thorough laboratory examination. viagra professional uk The pill has certain side effects such as nausea, headache, vision impairment, dizziness, and upset stomach etc. cialis overnight delivery Some of the most common causes of sexual Problems in Women: The causes of sexual issues It can occur because of psychological or buy cheap cialis click to read more physical problem. If generic viagra in usa and other treatments failed for you, then try VigRX Plus, you’ll not be a complete success overnight and quit your job next week.

What the Police Claim Were Their Reasons for Opposing Bail

To realise how unfair the court’s rejection of Choi’s bail application is, consider this: not only has Choi never had a criminal conviction but there are no victims in the “crimes” that Choi is alleged to have committed. He is not accused of killing anyone, bashing anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, stealing from anyone nor is he even accused of espionage. Thus, he would have been of zero threat to the community had he been released on bail. By contrast, George Pell who was accused – and then convicted – of a heinous sexual assault against a child was granted bail prior to his trial. This despite having access to massive financial backing and powerful friends with the capacity to allow him to flee the jurisdiction. The fact is that the justice system in this country does not at all treat everyone equally and as impartially as it claims. Rather, the justice system is a core part of state machinery that has been brought under the control of the wealthy capitalist class in order to serve its interests against those of the working class masses and their supporters. That is why greedy construction industry bosses in Australia get away with no criminal punishment for neglecting workplace safety to such a degree that on average over 30 construction industry workers are killed on the job every year. Yet representatives from the CFMMEU construction workers union get hit with criminal convictions, fines and potential jail terms just for standing up for workers’ safety and “illegally” inspecting unsafe work sites. We have a legal system where the ABCC “independent” construction industry watchdog slapped 99.2% of its huge $4.25 million in fines last financial year on workers and their union and just 0.08% on the filthy rich and notoriously criminal-infested construction industry bosses! Meanwhile, the state machinery here bent its own rules to enable billionaire James Packer’s Crown Group to set up an exclusive, six-star hotel and casino complex at Sydney’s Barangaroo despite Crown’s links to criminal-connected entities. Yet, in the process of forcibly relocating public housing tenants from the previously thriving working class community in nearby Millers Point in order to make the surroundings of Packer’s luxury resort more “compatible” with his project, state bureaucrats and tribunal judges bullied elderly working class tenants. This is the same state apparatus that is persecuting Chan Han Choi!

We cannot bring you the reasons that the judge gave for rejecting Choi’s bail application, as the judge has placed the details of that decision under a temporary non-publication order. However, we can say that the Prosecution’s main argument for opposing bail is that Choi would be a flight risk. Yet the truth is that Choi does not want to flee, because he wants to fight the charges and in the process expose the cruelty and unfairness of the economic sanctions on the DPRK, reveal all the violation of basic rights that he has endured and more (and that “more” could be politically explosive!). That is why Choi has refused to accept any offers for a plea bargain.

One of the most infuriating aspects of the Crown’s opposition to Choi’s bail application is that it included in good part an argument that Choi has few community ties in Australia because he has had “significantly diminished contact with his immediate family” since his arrest. Yet that “significantly diminished contact” is because of the actions of and decisions enforced by the Australian regime itself! One way they have achieved Choi’s isolation from his own family is by banning Choi – whose English is limited – from speaking in Korean to his wife – whose English is even poorer. At the start of his incarceration, prison guards would listen in on his phone calls and then cut the line if he and his wife inadvertently broke into Korean. Then on 22 February of this year, the regime got even nastier. Two officers from the Corrections Intelligence Group visited Choi and informed him that should he speak in Korean again he would be sent to Goulburn Supermax prison. Choi soon found out that he could not communicate with his wife in any meaningful way now and it was risky too – an inadvertent break into Korean could see him isolated in Goulburn Supermax. So that line of communication became completely cut. Meanwhile, in the classic guilt by association mantra of all repressive regimes, when Choi was arrested his adult son’s house was also raided and his son subjected to a threatening interrogation. Although police did not charge his son they made it clear that any support for, or association with, his father could see him in trouble. They also told him that he would no longer be able to work in any white collar jobs and had him sacked from a highly skilled role at a multinational IT hardware, infrastructure firm. Thus, his son has been effectively barred from communication with Choi. It is this isolation from his only child and the knowledge that his son’s career has been dealt a severe blow by the authorities that is the most painful part of the persecution that political prisoner Chan Han Choi has endured. To highlight the depth of the authorities’ efforts to isolate Choi from his family, the Australian regime also barred Choi’s application to be able to call even his daughter-in-law. And then they have the hide to say that he shouldn’t get bail because he has had “significantly diminished contact with his immediate family”!

The Persecution of Chan Han Choi and
Growing State Repression in Australia

In the Commonwealth DPP’s submission opposing the bail application of Chan Han Choi, they list the reasons for why they argue that the “Applicant’s alleged offending is objectively serious.” Their first point is about the maximum penalties for the alleged offences. However, number two on their list is “the Applicant’s repeated statements that he is a loyal subject of the DPRK.” In other words, because of Chan Han Choi’s open and proud sympathy for the socialistic DPRK his offences should be considered more serious than they otherwise would be! This is blatant political discrimination! Theoretically, according to Australia’s claimed pseudo-“democratic” legal system everyone is equal regardless of their political views. Now, of course, we know that this is not at all the case in real life. But in Choi’s bail hearing, the Australian regime was so brazen as to declare that because someone is a supporter of the DPRK they should have less rights than others. This dovetails with a rapidly intensifying Cold War witch-hunt going on in Australia against those who support socialistic states. The main targets of that witch-hunt have been people sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) or even those in the Chinese community accused of simply being not hostile enough to Red China. Chinese international students who have spoken out in support of the PRC – for example, by expressing opposition to supporters of the right-wing, pro-colonial riots in Hong Kong – have been demonised by the government and mainstream media as having “interfered” in Australian internal affairs. Most sinisterly, a few weeks ago the Australian government announced the creation of a new taskforce to look into “foreign interference” on Australian campuses. The “foreign interference” laws brought in last year are themselves a way to intimidate supporters of socialistic China. As the persecution of Chan Han Choi for his outspoken sympathy for the DPRK shows, the new anti-communist McCarthyite witch-hunt targets not only supporters of the world’s largest socialistic state. Who will be next attacked in Australia? Supporters of socialistic Cuba? People who advocate the policies practiced in the socialistic states like state ownership of the banks and extensive public housing? Sympathisers with the left-wing protest movement currently rocking Chile and Ecuador?

The forces of Cold War repression in Australia seem to also have supporters of Chan Han Choi in their sites. Point 20 of the Crown’s submissions opposing Choi’s bail application states that:

On two occasions when the Applicant’s matter has been before Central Local Court for mention, supporters have attended with one of them wearing a t-shirt bearing the flag of the DPRK above the words “See you in Pyongyang” which was displayed prominently (the first time, in the foyer of the court; the second time, in the body of the court during the mention of the matter) and then covered up. On the first occasion, those supporters also photographed the outside of the court including members of the Prosecution who were walking down the steps and then immediately attending an internet café before splitting up.

The comrades involved in this highly “subversive” act of “wearing a t-shirt bearing the flag of the DPRK” and then “attending an internet cafe” immediately after attending court said that they were in the Internet cafe and then talked together outside for a combined period of over an hour before “splitting up.” That means that the AFP/ASIO officers who stalked them not only tailed them the hundreds of metres from the court to the internet cafe but also carried out surveillance on them for over an hour! And how is this relevant to a bail submission? Not at all! The Crown’s only motive in putting this in a public bail submission would be to send a message to Choi’s supporters that they are being followed. Certainly, intimidation of political opponents is a central part of the modus operandi of the AFP. Just two months before Chan Han Choi was arrested, the AFP intimidated the entire workers movement when they conducted heavy-handed raids on the Sydney and Melbourne offices of the Australian Workers Union over trumped up allegations about union donations to political campaigns more than twelve years ago. Then in June, the AFP launched a threatening raid on the home of Murdoch journalist, Annika Smethhurst, over her story explaining how the government was considering extending the role of the Australian Signals Directorate from spying on foreign entities to targeting Australian citizens. That was followed up the next day by an even more high profile AFP raid. This time the AFP raided ABC headquarters in response to an ABC exposé of some of the war crimes committed by Australian special forces troops in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, it is the same AFP and Commonwealth DPP who are prosecuting Choi who are also prosecuting Witness K, the former Australian intelligence agent who revealed to journalists how the ASIS spy agency had bugged East Timorese government buildings in order to give the Australian government – and the corporations, like Woodside, that it was acting on behalf of – the advantage in maritime boundary and oil resource negotiations with East Timor. Witness K and his lawyer, Bernard Collaery, today face imprisonment for their decent act of revealing to the world this bullying, colonialist outrage. The same forces persecuting Choi, Witness K and Collaery are also prosecuting David McBride, the military lawyer who blew the whistle on war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan.

Yet, it is not only the AFP that is engaged in repressing whistleblowers and dissidents. The whole Australian capitalist regime is being unleashed. Three weeks ago, home affairs minister Peter Dutton responded to climate change protests by calling for participants who receive welfare benefits to have their payments cut and for mandatory jail sentences for protesters who disrupt traffic. Of course, the regime here is not against all protests. They never made the kind of attacks that Dutton has fired off against climate change protesters against those who participated in the violent racist, “Reclaim Australia” protests a few years ago. And they are all for the anti-Red China riots in Hong Kong that has seen rich kid rioters vandalise subway stations, smash shops and assault supporters of the PRC. Prominent hard right Liberal MP, Tim Wilson, even went all the way to Hong Kong to join a march of these right-wing rioters. Yet any protest, whistleblowing or action in Australia that in the slightest way undermines the interests of the big end of town and the regime that serves it is facing the threat of growing repression. Just ask the many staunch trade unionists in Australia who are being hauled through the courts at an ever increasing rate!

It is true that the Australian regime’s attacks on our trade unions, their persecution of whistleblowers and journalists and their persecution of people sympathizing with socialistic China and – in the case of Chan Han Choi – with the socialistic DPRK are each different in their own way. Yet, there is a common thread to them and common root causes. One key root cause is that the capitalist system is, on the one hand, increasingly unable to provide secure jobs for most workers – especially young workers – while, on the other, is heading towards another steep economic downturn. The second fundamental factor – which is accentuated by the first – is that the insecure imperialist ruling classes are driven to intensify their Cold War against socialistic China and her DPRK ally. In this context, the nervous capitalist rulers in Australia, like their counterparts abroad, are gradually moving to constrict the political rights of the masses, intimidate dissidents and whistleblowers and suppress the voice of those who uphold an alternative system to capitalism. And they are so hell-bent on this course that even mainstream Murdoch and government-owned media journalists who have themselves done so much to feed the anti-PRC Cold War are themselves sometimes targeted if they occasionally do an investigative report that, in some way, contradicts the narrative that’s being pushed by the ruling class.

Of course, it is hardly a surprise that the Australian and other capitalist states should play this role. After all, that is what they were built up for in the first place! The “democracy” that supposedly exists in this country is only a democracy for the rich. For not only are the state organs tied by thousands of threads to the ultra-rich, the “democratic” and electoral processes are dominated by the capitalist class. It is they who own the media, who are able to sway politicians and bureaucrats with the enticement of future high-paying jobs in the corporations that they own and who have the immense wealth that allows them to disproportionately fund political parties, pay for political advertising and hire lobbyists. And we know too that when the working class masses show signs of rising up, the “democratic” capitalists will not baulk at turning to would-be military dictators or fascist extremists lurking on the edges if that is what it takes to save their class rule – the way they did in Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany, Suharto’s Indonesia and Pinochet’s Chile. So when one hears that the AFP/ASIO is, on the one hand, stalking left-wing supporters of Choi and, on the other hand, doing almost nothing to curb violent far-right racists – they did not even have the Australian fascist terrorist who ended up murdering 51 people in the NZ mosque shootings under any sort of surveillance despite him making many violent threatening statements online – one should not be surprised. However, we should not be indifferent to the growing political repression in this country. In the struggle for the improvement in the lives of the working class and oppressed we need to utilise every democratic right that exists – however tenuous those rights may be – especially since many of these rights were won in struggle by the masses. That is why everyone who supports the rights of the working class and downtrodden – regardless of whether they agree with Choi’s politics or not – and everyone who opposes the growing political repression in Australia must stand against the blatantly political persecution of Chan Han Choi. This as part of defending all those targeted by the rising authoritarian wave. We must demand: Drop all charges against Chan Han Choi, David McBride, Witness K and Bernard Collaery!  Stop the Australian regime’s persecution of whistleblowers and investigative journalists! Resist the new Cold War, McCarthyist witch-hunt of supporters of socialistic China and her DPRK ally! 

Mobilise Mass Action to Demand Freedom for Chan Han Choi

When one steps back and looks at the picture of what is happening in Australia – Cold War witch-hunting, union-busting and targeting of whistleblowers and investigative journalists – the real reason why the Commonwealth DPP opposed bail for Choi is apparent. And this has little to do with a genuine fear that he would try to abscond. Rather, it is an attempt to silence Choi so that his opposition to the cruel UN sanctions will not be heard and so that he will not be able to further energise his growing base of supporters. The AFP actually gave this away in their own “Statement of Facts.” In it they state that the “AFP opposes the Accused being granted bail, for the following reasons” and then give as one of the reasons the following:

The Accused has made numerous statements while in custody, which have been posted online to YouTube, through which the Accused apportions blame onto others for his incarceration, and portrays himself as a “political prisoner”:

 i. sanctions against the DPRK are unfair and unjust;

 ii. he has been denied “basic human rights”;

 iii. he has “supporters” (groups and individuals) located in Australia and worldwide;

 iv. other evidence against the DPRK has been “faked”; and

 v. his arrest is a “political matter” instigated by the South Korean Government and perpetrated with the cooperation of the Australian Government;

In other words, the AFP is saying that Choi expressing such political views, including his opposition to the economic sanctions on the DPRK, is a reason to deny him bail!

From the time that then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull commented on Choi’s arrest with the extreme claim that, “North Korea is a dangerous, reckless criminal regime threatening the peace of the region” to the AFP’s opposition to bail being granted to Choi in good part based on his sympathy for the socialistic DPRK and his outspoken opposition to the sanctions against her, the arrest and imprisonment of Chan Han Choi has been a saga of Cold War anti-communist persecution. That is why even within the parameters of unjust laws enforcing the UN sanctions, there is no way that Chan Han Choi can get a fair trial. For one, the statements by the then highest political officer in the country, Malcolm Turnbull, which as good as pronounced Choi guilty and associated his arrest with a rabid rant against the state that Choi is sympathetic to has prejudiced any jury that would sit on Choi’s upcoming trial. Moreover, the ongoing special restrictions on Choi in prison limit his ability to properly prepare and adequately brief his legal team for his trial. For example, recent attempt by his lawyers to mail crucial legal documents to Choi were blocked from getting through. Moreover, since late last year he has not been permitted to even telephone his own lawyers. After being blocked from visiting him for several months, Choi’s lawyers now have clearance to visit him in custody but at the time of writing the Korean interpreters needed to make any legal visit meaningful have not received clearance to accompany his legal representatives. Meanwhile, Choi’s legal team have still not received funding for the Korean interpreters essential to preparing Choi’s defence. This is almost certainly no accident. It bears an eerie resemblance to what is going on in another case of political persecution – that of Witness K. As of late August, Witness K’s counsel angrily announced that his client had received almost no funding from Legal Aid despite having applied for it more than a year previously! Witness K’s counsel, Haydn Carmichael, accused Legal Aid of an “extraordinary unexplained roadblock.”

What has happened throughout Choi’s incarceration gives zero confidence that the authorities are going to change course and allow him to properly prepare for his trial. When Choi was first arrested, following an initial visit from a lawyer soon after his arrest, he went through an approximately 50 day period when he was prevented from having visits from anyone at all – including lawyers, family and friends. His current lawyer was able to visit in mid-September last year soon after she took on the case. However, once it became clear that she was not going to roll over and push Choi into pleading guilty, not only did Choi’s right to call her get taken away but her visits and those of any interpreter faced repeated obstruction. After having been able to have an initial visit to Choi, suddenly she had to apply for a security clearance to visit Choi as did Korean-English interpreters. As a result, in the one year period following their initial visit to Choi in mid-September 2018, Choi’s lawyers were only able to visit him twice in jail and only one of those visits were with an interpreter. For periods, even attempts by Choi’s lawyers to have audio-visual links with him (which are no substitute for visits as they do not allow for the practical joint perusal and discussion of legal documents) were delayed for months on the grounds that even such communication with Choi needed approval by the Commissioner of Prisons. In contrast, in the early-middle part of last year, when Choi had a government appointed lawyer that was pushing him to plead guilty, that lawyer was able to visit with an interpreter without any obstruction and was able to have weekly visits to Choi.

Realising that he cannot get a fair trial, Choi has put in a motion for a Permanent Stay in proceedings. If successful such a motion will mean that, on the grounds that he cannot get due process, his trial will be put on hold indefinitely and he will be released from custody. One additional reason why Choi made this application for Permanent Stay is that it appears that – and he seems to have legal documents to prove this – the AFP have submitted documentary “evidence” with crucial information deleted from the documents without even informing the defence that they – or their source – have made such deletions. When the AFP raided ABC headquarters in June, they did so under a search warrant that allowed them to “add, copy, delete or alter other data … found in the course of a search.” Did their warrant to arrest Choi have similar provisions and are they now putting the “delete” option into practice? Or did they or their source (likely to be from South Korean or perhaps U.S. intelligence) do this anyway? Stay tuned to hear a lot more about this later!

The problem facing Chan Han Choi in his Permanent Stay motion is that the court that will hear this motion is itself part of the biased, capitalist state machinery that makes it impossible for him to get a fair trial in the first place. That is why only mass action on the streets in support of Choi can make the Australian capitalist state pull back from their course to railroad him into a long sentence through an unfair prosecution. The good thing is that support for Choi is building every day. Even now, Chan Han Choi can be proud that through his brave stance in support of the DPRK, his refusal to plead guilty and his outspoken opposition to the economic sanctions imposed on the people of North Korea, new people have been energised in opposition to the sanctions and in defence of the socialistic DPRK. Thus, the last protest action six months ago in support of Choi and in opposition to the economic sanctions on North Korea was not only the first actual street march with a pro-DPRK content in several decades in Australia, it was also the biggest pro-DPRK action in Australia in at least the last four decades … and possibly ever.

The Australian regime are clearly rattled by the support that is building for Choi. Indeed the AFP even note the 13 April  Free Chan Han Choi march in the latest version of their “Statement of Facts”:

The AFP allege the Accused’s “supporters”, including members of the Trotskyist Platform, Aust-DPRK Solidarity, Australia-DPRK Friendship Society, Stalin Society of Australia, the Irish Republican socialist group the James Connolly Association, Young Communists – Western Sydney and the Lebanese Communist Party, held a rally on 13 April 2019 in support of the Accused describing him a “left-wing political prisoner”. This group declares that the Accused, even if guilty, would not be a considered a criminal from that group’s standpoint.

That those persecuting Choi are rattled by the growing support for him should only encourage us to work still harder to build broader and deeper forces to fight for his freedom. The capitalist regime really believe that everyone buys their propaganda. That is why they thought that persecuting Choi would be a piece of cake, a walk in the park that no one would oppose. Yet for militant trade unionists who know that this regime lies when it attacks their unions, why should they then believe what this regime says about the DPRK or about other international questions. Similarly, for public housing tenants being stigmatised and unemployed workers being vilified by the regime as lazy alcoholics and drug addicts, why should they believe what this same regime says in its attacks on North Korea when they know that this regime lies about them? And for Aboriginal people whose family and friends have been killed by state forces in custody, there is no reason to believe what this racist, rich people’s regime says about North Korea or any other question for that matter when this very same regime tries to pass off the killing of their family and friends as “accidents.” That is why the people who have most reason to distrust and oppose the Australian capitalist regime are coming together to support Chan Han Choi. Those committed to opposing the growing repression in Australia, people who understand that public ownership of the economy is the only road to advancement for working class people and opponents of imperialist bullying of the ex-colonies must come together in ever stronger actions to demand freedom for Chan Han Choi and an end to the brutal economic sanctions on the people of North Korea.

Chinese Community Marks 19th Century Anti-Chinese Riots amidst Growing Anti-Chinese Racism in Today’s Australia

Above photo: February 2017, a Chinese Australian woman named Lina who was bashed by a white racist man in broad daylight near the main shopping mall in the Sydney suburb of Burwood. The attacker, who is completely unknown to Lina, started screaming racist abuse at her, yelling at Lina to ‘Get out of my country’ before punching her in the face.

Chinese Community Marks
19th Century Anti-Chinese Riots
Amidst Growing Anti-Chinese
Racism in Today’s Australia

28 December 2018 – Two months ago, Trotskyist Platform comrades were invited by leaders of a working class Chinese group to participate in a community event marking the second anniversary of the erection of a monument to the victims of the anti-Chinese riots during the mid-1800s Gold Rush. The October 14 commemoration was held at Rookwood cemetery in Sydney’s Western suburbs. The anti-Chinese riots that the memorial event marked were truly horrendous. The most notorious of these was the June 1861 Lambing Flat riot (near the modern NSW town of Young) when a horde of thousands of white racists violently attacked hundreds of Chinese miners and their family members and destroyed their tents and other possessions. Despite the best efforts of official Australian history to whitewash this truth, it is widely known by the Chinese community that several Chinese people were actually murdered by the racist mobs. The response of the colonial governments to these riots was not to come to the aid of the Chinese community. It was, instead, the very opposite: they enacted special legislation to exclude and discriminate against Chinese people. This was followed the next century by the White Australia Policy which excluded Chinese people as well as Indians, Indonesians, Pacific Islanders, Africans and, indeed, all people of colour from entering Australia.

An artwork depicting Chinese people fleeing during the 1861 Lambing Flat riots (near the modern NSW town of Young). The riot saw thousands of racist white gold prospectors attacking the Chinese miners and their family members, destroying their tents and murdering several Chinese people.
When an adult male is in the andropause stage, he might experience temporary ED even though he has no psychological problem. appalachianmagazine.com order viagra It is very essential for the men to be prescription de viagra canada away from embarrassment. In fact, the online classes are quite cheap and people from all strata of the society can easily opt viagra 25 mg for them. Prostatitis has a certain degree of influence on purchase cheap viagra the fertility, but not very big.

Yet the significance of commemorating the 19th century anti-Chinese riots is not mainly about the past. It is about the present and the future. Whether and how we mark major events of the past is both a reflection of where we stand today and an important part of the struggle for the kind of society that we want tomorrow. Thus, it was rather concerning what a speaker from the Chinese Heritage Association of Australia pointed out at the October 14 commemoration: that study of the anti-Chinese riots has been dropped from being a mandated part of Australia’s High School intermediate years’ history syllabus. Instead, it has been relegated to an optional segment that may or may not be taught at the discretion of the teacher. The authorities’ aversion to telling the truth about anti-Chinese racism in the past can only be understood as a sign of their willingness to pander to – and even foster – anti-Chinese prejudice today. It is much like how when, four years ago, then prime minister Tony Abbott contemptuously dismissed the vibrant, pre-1788 Aboriginal societies – remarking that Sydney was “nothing but bush” prior to the arrival of the First Fleet – he was advancing the agenda of current Australian regimes to perpetuate their brutal dispossession of Aboriginal people.

The main reason why it is important to commemorate the 19th century anti-Chinese riots is because we are seeing an escalation of anti-Chinese racism in Australia today. In July last year, threatening posters appeared in the University of Melbourne and Monash University – Melbourne’s two most prestigious universities – warning Chinese students that if they entered they would be deported. Then this May, extreme racists unleashed a poster blitz in the multi-racial Sydney suburb of Ryde demanding, “No More Asians” and making a series of vile racist slurs [1]. However, most worrying are not the verbal insults and threats but the very real, racist physical violence that is being unleashed. In October last year, three Chinese high-school students were bashed by racists at a bus stop in Canberra. Two months before this, a white supremacist university student at Canberra’s ANU pulled out a baseball bat during his Statistics class and beat and tried to kill his tutor of Chinese origin and four other Chinese students. The situation has become so alarming that last December, the Chinese consulate in Melbourne felt it necessary to issue a warning to Chinese students of threats to their safety [2]. And it is certainly not only international students who are being targeted by violent racists. In May, a racist man went on a rampage in the Sydney suburb of Randwick specifically attacking any Asian looking person he could find – punching and kicking at least seven people including women and a 70 year-old man [3].

Canberra, October 2017. Left: One of two Chinese high-school students brutally bashed when they were set upon by a pack of about ten racists screaming “F….g Chinese! Go back to your country!” Right: In a separate attack in the same city around the same period, racists chased a female, young Chinese student causing her to bruise her knees after falling

The response of the Chinese community to this reality has been varied. This was evident in the speeches made at the October event marking the 19th century anti-Chinese riots. A few community members bravely spoke of the racism that Chinese and other “ethnic” communities continue to face in Australia. However, others thought it best to ignore or downplay the reality of growing anti-Chinese racism in Australia today. They spoke of anti-Chinese violence as wholly an issue of the past. At most anti-Chinese racism was referred to as something that we need to be vigilant against the return of but not something that society is currently being threatened by. These community members hope that minimizing the extent of today’s racism in their speeches and only speaking of contemporary Australia as a “wonderful, multi-cultural society” will somehow diminish the problem. They no doubt feel that by expressing their love for the current Australian social structure this will bring the Chinese community greater acceptance. History has proven however that this approach does not work. In May 1901, many members of the Chinese community in Melbourne showed their loyalty to the ruling establishment by participating in commemoration events to mark the visit of the Duke and Duchess of York to open Australia’s first national parliament. Yet just seven months later, Australia’s ruling class turned around and kicked the Chinese community in the face when they brought into force the Immigration Restriction Act. That notorious act, which formalised the White Australia Policy, provided for the exclusion of all people of colour from entering Australia and was particularly aimed against Chinese would-be migrants. It also facilitated the deportation of Chinese and other non-white people already living in Australia.

A despicable racist Australian cartoon from the late 1880s. In good part, the racist Australian establishment saw federation as a way to ensure that people from Australia’s neighbouring Asia and Pacific region – especially Chinese people – were excluded from this country.

The different responses of individuals in the Chinese community to the growing racism in contemporary Australia is shaped in good part by their own class position. Those who are wealthy business owners, affluent professionals or others who have been decorated by official Australian society are, in general, less willing to call out the intensifying racism. Although racism affects all classes within targeted groups, those doing well under the current social structure are more willing to grit their teeth and endure racist outrages because they are “grateful” to the current society for bringing them a privileged social position and don’t want to do anything to criticize or undermine a status quo that has served them very well. At the other end of the class spectrum, working class Chinese people suffering low wages and harsh working conditions in, say, the construction or retail sector or who are struggling to find any secure work at all don’t have much reason to be loyal to Australia’s current social structure. Consequently, they are, in general, less willing to absolve Australian society for any of the racist outrages that they are hit with. Meanwhile, their more vulnerable socio-economic position also makes them less able to mitigate the effects of racism. Thus, a working class Chinese person seeking to rent a home at the overcrowded low-end of the market is much more affected by the notorious discrimination in the housing market against people of Aboriginal, Asian, Middle Eastern and African heritage [4] than a wealthy Chinese person able to buy a high-end property. It is therefore telling that it was a working class Chinese organisation – having a membership policy that like our trade unions and most avowedly left-wing political parties excludes business owners using hired labour from membership – that took the initiative to spearhead the campaign for the erection of a monument to the victims of the 19th century anti-Chinese riots.

CONTEMPORARY VERSIONS OF THE LAMBING FLAT RIOTS

To underscore why events like the 19th century anti-Chinese riots sadly cannot be considered merely as incidents of Australia’s distant past, we only have to look back 13 years when the Sydney beachside suburb of Cronulla witnessed a mass racist riot in the style of the Lambing Flat riots. Thousands of racists savagely rampaged against people of Middle Eastern and South Asian backgrounds and, indeed, against anyone without white skin. An Aboriginal youth and many people of Afghan, Bangladeshi, Iranian and Lebanese background were amongst those brutally bashed. Indeed, anyone at the beach who did not appear White enough was attacked. Thus, among those physically attacked was at least one boy of Jewish heritage and one girl of Greek background.

Then, not much more than two years ago, a racist upsurge in the Western Australian town of Kalgoorlie-Boulder culminated in the killing of 14 year-old Aboriginal youth, Elijah Doughty. In that case, unlike at Lambing Flat and Cronulla Beach, the mass racist outpouring was not initially in the form of a physical mob but, rather, a social media lynch mob. The lynch mob masked their racist essence as opposition to the alleged theft of dirt bikes by Aboriginal youth. In the lead up to the murder of Elijah, two local community Facebook groups were not only infused with extreme racist bigotry towards Aboriginal people but included calls for violence. Just a week before Elijah’s murder, after a woman posted a claim that two Aboriginal youths had broken into a ute, a man replied, “Feel free to run the oxygen thieves off the road if you see them”, while another man wrote, “Everyone talks about hunting down these sub human mutts, but no one ever does.” Then, as racists on the social media pages continued to use derogatory terms to refer to Aboriginal people – such as “darkies” and “non-reflectives” – one user wrote: “How many human bodies would it take to fill the mineshafts around Kalgoorlie? A: We’re one theft closer to finding out!” Undoubtedly charged up by all this extreme racist bigotry, a 56 year-old white man driving in his 4WD ute, chased 14 year-old Elijah who was riding a small motorbike down a dirt track. The murderer then rammed into Elijah’s motorbike after having revved up to a speed so much faster than the child’s bike that he smashed it into three main pieces and split the Aboriginal child’s skull in two.

The Chinese community in Australia should not take any comfort that the direct targets of these contemporary versions of the Lambing Flat Riots were not people of Chinese heritage. This is not only because all attacks on people because of their race or religion are abhorrent acts. It is also because racist attacks against one targeted group inevitably inflames the white supremacist bigotry that leads to increased attacks on other victimized communities. It is worth focusing on a slightly smaller, copy-cat version of the Cronulla riot that took place just over three years after the “original” Cronulla pogrom when hundreds of white males at Manly Beach went on a rampage attacking any non-white person who was driving a car. On that 2009 “Australia Day” – which Aboriginal people and their supporters know as Invasion Day – the main targets of the racists were people of Asian appearance rather than people from the Middle East (who were the main victims of the Cronulla riot). Indeed, during the “Australia Day” Manly Beach riot, the violent racists assaulted an Asian woman so badly that she was sent to hospital in an ambulance.

WHITE SUPREMACY AND ANTI-CHINESE RACISM

In Australia, Aboriginal people continue to suffer the most all-sided racist discrimination and abuse. In the last decade alone, 147 indigenous people have died in state custody in Australia, many of whom were outright killed by racist police or prison guards. This extreme racism against Aboriginal people has a particular character because it stems, in part, from the truth that Aboriginal people are this country’s first peoples who were brutally dispossessed by murderous colonial forces. The powers that be continue to oppress and vilify the Aboriginal community in order to perpetuate and “justify” this historic dispossession. On top of all this, Aboriginal people also suffer racism simply because they are not white and such racism is also experienced by all people of colour in Australia.

Who the second most victimized ethnic community in Australia is – after Aboriginal people – seems to change almost like the whims of fashion for the racist rednecks committing the attacks. In the late 1980s and then less than a decade later, Asian origin people were especially targeted coinciding with John Howard’s push to curb Asian immigration and then Pauline Hanson’s rise to prominence. There was also a period when the Vietnamese community were singled out with hysterical media and politician hype about “Vietnamese crime gangs” making some suburbs “no go areas.” For much of the last two decades, the Muslim community have been in the cross-hairs of racist laws, police harassment, vilification from politicians and media and violent attacks on the streets. In the December 2005 Cronulla riot and the media incitement that preceded it, racists especially targeted Lebanese origin people in a lynch-mob upsurge directed, more broadly, at all non-white people. Then in the 2008 to 2010 period, there was a spate of racist assaults against Indian and other South Asian students and to a slightly lesser extent Chinese students. South Asian communities continue to be targeted by racist rednecks. Just two months ago, racist vandals set fire to the Barathiye Mandir Hindu temple in Sydney’s Regents Park. Scrolling the word “Jesus” on walls of the building, they destroyed the building’s interior [5]. Meanwhile, over the last few years, politicians, neo-Nazi gangs and the mainstream media have made hysterical claims about the supposed “threat” of Sudanese “gangs” in order to whip up racist hostility towards African origin people. This is after migrants from Africa and their children have been made to suffer decades of racist police harassment in Australia as well as blatant discrimination in employment and housing. In the last few years, racist forces have also, once again, lined up the Chinese community in their cross-hairs.

Looking back over the last 200 years as a whole – and thus including the riots against Chinese people during the Gold Rush, the 19th century anti-Chinese laws and then the 20th century White Australia Policy – it is arguable that people of Chinese background have been second only to Aboriginal people in copping racist attacks in Australia. This has a lot to do with the nature of racism: it is in good part based on irrational fear. Since Chinese people are the largest ethnic group in the Asian region that borders Australia – and indeed the largest ethnic group in the entire world – one of the darkest, White Australia racist fears is that Chinese immigrants will one day outnumber whites; and that this will lead to the tremendous natural wealth of this country having to be shared with a greater number of people which, according to the demented “logic” of xenophobia, will lead to the high standard of living in Australia being reduced to the levels of neighbouring Asia-Pacific lands.

THE TOXIC INGREDIENTS
FUELING ANTI-CHINESE RACISM IN TODAY’S AUSTRALIA

There are three components to the fuel that is powering the resurgent anti-Chinese racism in Australia. Firstly, there is the scapegoating of migrants and all non-white ethnic groups by mainstream politicians and media for the key problems facing the masses. Australia is a country of great inequality. The richest 200 people have a total wealth of more than $282 billion [6]. Yet this country, despite its tremendous resource wealth, has a much higher proportion of homeless people than the resource-poor, Peoples Republic of China. Faced with the possibility that the dispossessed will unite to rebel against such inequality and facing mass anger about job insecurity, stagnant wages, unaffordable rents and inadequate infrastructure, the politicians and media that serve the rich business tycoons seek to blame minorities for the problems that corporate greed and the capitalist system’s failings cause. Since Chinese background people are the biggest non-white ethnic group in Australia, it is inevitable that racist scapegoating of migrants and people of colour greatly impacts the Chinese community.

Extreme right-wing politicians like Pauline Hanson, David Leyonhjelm and Fraser Anning and media shock jocks like Alan Jones are spearheading the charge against migrants and coloured ethnic communities. Right now they are especially targeting this country’s African community. However, the Liberal/National government is not far behind the most rabid racist bigots in parliament. Last month, prime mister Scott Morrison blamed migration for traffic congestion, crowded public transport and a lack of school places when he pandered to open racist forces and flagged a cut to migration numbers. What the government does not want to tell people is that migrants, by working and paying taxes, provide resources to fund schools, infrastructure and public transport and that a larger population actually makes expanding public transport more viable. Morrison and Co. don’t want people to know this or else people may realise that inadequate funds for social services and infrastructure are actually caused by governments allowing a small class of ultra-rich tycoons to hoard so much of the wealth of this country. Yet the ALP opposition has barely opposed the Liberals’ move to cut the migration intake. Bill Shorten’s response to Morrison’s migration cut plan was to say that the focus should, instead, be on cutting the number of people arriving on temporary work visas. Meanwhile, ALP leaders occasionally try to outdo their right-wing rivals in racist scapegoating. In May, then NSW Labor leader, Luke Foley, inflamed hostility to non-white migrants by claiming that refugees are swamping Western Sydney leading to a “white flight” of Anglo families from these suburbs.

The second component of the fuel powering anti-Chinese racism is economic nationalism in its various forms. One of the economic nationalist refrains chanted in recent years by the mainstream media and many politicians is the claim that Australia is “being bought up” by China. This claim is completely false and serves to get the local, all Aussie billionaires who really own this country off the hook. The truth is that Australia is not being taken over by any foreign country. The lion’s share of its wealth has been snatched by local tycoons like Anthony Pratt, Gina Rinehart and her feuding family, Andrew Forrest, the Lowys, James Packer and their ilk. Moreover, as far as foreign ownership in Australia is concerned, China is only a small player. You wouldn’t think so given the media hype but China, the world’s most populous country, is only the ninth biggest foreign investor in Australia. China makes up only a tiny 2% of all foreign investment into Australia [7].

Another mantra recited by those promoting economic nationalist “solutions” to unemployment and tepid industrial development is the notion that schemes are needed to restrict imports and to favour locally produced items in infrastructure projects. The basis of this Donald Trump-like protectionist doctrine – which in Australia often targets Chinese steel imports – is the idea that imports “steal local jobs.” The reality however is that a protectionist program does not save local jobs. For just as one country can put barriers to imports from another country the other country or third countries can do the same to the country that originally placed the restrictions. Think what would happen if protectionists had their way and curbed imports from China and China naturally responded by doing the same? Australia currently exports nearly a whopping $50 billion more goods and services to China than it imports from her [8]. Therefore, mutual trade restrictions would lead to huge job losses here. It would also cause increased prices for the smartphones, computers, TVs, whitegoods, furniture, toys and other items currently imported from China.

The economic nationalist demand most frequently promoted in recent years in Australia has been the call to restrict temporary skilled migrant workers (formerly known as 457 Visa workers) who it is claimed are “taking Aussie jobs.” Yet these workers make up only a tiny 0.5% of the total Australian workforce. What is more, like other migrants they pay taxes and spend the money they earn – thus creating as many jobs as they supposedly “take.”

Economic nationalism is not always based on open racism. Indeed, whereas it is still a minority of Australia’s population that is rabidly racist – although unfortunately quite a sizable minority – the majority of this country’s population buy into economic nationalist slogans in one form or another. However, while economic nationalism is not the same as racism it certainly fuels racist prejudice. For any policy that calls for putting the interests of (mainly white) Australian workers over (overwhelmingly coloured) lower paid workers from “Third World” countries will inevitably appeal to and reinforce White Australia xenophobic attitudes as well as “First World” arrogance. This was most evident in an ALP video advertisement boasting that they would “Employ Australians First” that had visuals where nearly all the Australians shown were white Anglos. The advertisement, which was released in May last year, had an unmistakable racist message: white people had to be supposedly protected from having their jobs taken away by non-white people. Let us not forget too that the White Australia Policy itself – including the notorious 1901 Immigration Restriction Act – was motivated in good part on economic nationalist grounds: supposedly to stop the employment of Chinese, Indian and Pacific Islander workers from undercutting the pay and conditions of white workers. Given that China is, today, Australia’s largest source of imports, the third biggest source country for temporary skilled migrant workers and mythically the country that is investing a lot in Australia, economic nationalist appeals are doing much to fuel anti-Chinese racism – just as they did in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

31 July 2015: Union-led rallies against the China Australia Free Trade Agreement (CHAFTA) were based on the divisive nationalist agenda of giving greater support to local bosses in trade and purchasing over overseas producers. The rallies were also shot through with irrational fear mongering about China as seen by this sign (Right) at the Sydney anti-CHAFTA protest. The national-chauvinist essence of the protest was indeed so strong that the fascist Party For Freedom felt comfortable enough to participate and brandish its openly racist slogans (Left). Economic nationalism fuels racial prejudice. Such divisive agendas must be driven out of our union movement in order to unify the working class, focus the masses on the necessary struggle against the job-slashing local capitalists and strengthen the ability of the union movement to wage class struggle resistance against the greedy bosses.

The most fanatical in promoting economic nationalism are the far-right parties like Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and Katter’s Australian Party. However, all the current parliamentary parties promote one form of economic nationalism or another. Thus, although the ALP has, overall, not been as strident in promoting direct anti-immigrant racism as the Liberals and although the Greens have opposed some of the most blatant anti-refugee and racist policies and statements of both major parties, the ALP and Greens have actually been even more zealous in making economic nationalist appeals than the conservative Liberal-National Coalition.

Unfortunately, the leadership of many of our trade unions have also been making economic nationalist demands on the grounds that this will help protect local jobs and wages. However, protectionism does not actually protect workers jobs and conditions. In fact, it does the very opposite. Firstly, by dividing workers across national lines – and this also causes divisions within local workers on ethnic lines as Australian workers originating from the country targeted by protectionist appeals are inevitably looked on with suspicion – economic nationalist agendas weaken the workers movement and make it less able to stand up to greedy, job-slashing bosses. Secondly, calls to favour local businesses, by making out that local capitalists are somehow benevolent, undermine workers understanding that improvements in their working conditions and stopping job cuts can only come through struggle against these local exploiters.

It is true that profit-obsessed business owners will try to use insecure, guest workers with few rights – and the constant threat of deportation hanging over them – as a source of labour that they can super-exploit (like they already do to youth workers, apprentices and many casual workers). Our unions are right to be concerned about this. However, the way to undercut bosses’ attempts to undermine working conditions is not to pit local workers against guest workers with divisive slogans, like “Keep Out 457 Visa Workers!” which many of our current union leaders promote. What is needed, instead, is to fight to ensure that guest workers are paid the same rates as local workers and to win these workers the same rights as citizens so that they are able to stand up for their rights. There are many past examples of overseas workers employed in Australia fighting for their rights and cases when these struggles won important backing from local unions. In January 1942, left-wing Chinese activists in Australia, together with the Seamen’s Union of Australia, helped organise seafarers from China working on ships docking in Australian ports into the Chinese Seamen’s Union (CSU). The Chinese and other coloured seafarers were paid much lower rates and had worse conditions than their white counterparts. However, in the same month as the CSU was formed, 500 Chinese seafarers from six ships docked in Fremantle went on strike and occupied the ships demanding equal pay as white workers and improved working conditions. The strikers bravely faced off armed troops. The Australian troops attacked the Chinese workers and killed two of the heroic strikers. Nevertheless, the brave struggle of the Chinese strikers in Fremantle and in other subsequent battles helped to eventually win pay rises for all Chinese seafarers working in Australia. Later, after racist ALP immigration minister, Arthur Calwell introduced, in 1949, the War-time Refugees Removal Act to deport current and former Chinese seafarers who had remained in Australia after being stranded during the war, Australian unions supported the campaign of the CSU and pro-communist Australian-Chinese activists against their deportation. Eventually their struggle was won and the Menzies government had to abandon Calwell’s racist Act. Today, our unions sometimes do make laudable efforts to win justice for guest workers who are being severely mistreated. However, this is undermined by many union leaders’ divisive, nationalist calls to restrict the entry of these guest workers in order to “protect local jobs.” The pro-ALP leaders of our unions look to such protectionist “solutions” to unemployment and worsening working conditions in proportion to the degree with which they bow to anti-strike laws and turn away from what is actually needed to fight for workers’ jobs security and decent wages. It is militant industrial action that is needed to win higher wages, to secure permanency for casual workers and to prevent companies slashing jobs.

The third component of the toxic cocktail fueling anti-Chinese racism is anti-communist hostility to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). The last few years have seen Australian politicians, mainstream media, think tanks and so-called “experts” increasingly making up hyped-up claims against China. They accuse the PRC of everything from cyber-hacking, to interfering in Australian political life, to sending in Chinese international students to spy in Australia, to supposed bullying behaviour in the South China Sea to giving too much aid to Australia’s Pacific neighbours. This propaganda campaign waged by the Australian ruling class serves to “justify” their hostile actions against Red China. These actions include a military build up targeted at China, the stationing of U.S. troops in Darwin aimed against China and North Korea, the deployment of Australian naval vessels and aircraft thousands of kilometres away from home in waters off China and Korea and the supporting of anti-PRC Chinese exile organisations. So why do Australia’s ruling elite want to do this given that China is by far Australia’s biggest export destination and given that these exports to China have been holding up the entire Australian economy? Well, the capitalist bigwigs who run this country calculate that as much profit as they are currently making from sending exports to China and as much as the conciliatory policies of the Chinese government already allow Australian investors to make a bit of profit from some degree of exploitation of workers within China, they could make even more if China’s socialistic system were to be overthrown and the country thus turned into a giant sweatshop for unrestrained exploitation of labour. Moreover, today, by providing infrastructure and development assistance to Australia’s Pacific and Asian neighbours in a mutually beneficial way, the existence of China as a socialistic power is undermining Australia’s neo-colonial stranglehold over countries like PNG, East Timor, Fiji and Vanuatu. Hence, for the Australian government, “containing” China is a matter of protecting the super-profits of unscrupulous Australian corporations operating in neighbouring Asia-Pacific countries.

The Australian regime’s anti-China propaganda blitz causes hostility to the Chinese community within Australia. For it leads to the Chinese community inevitably becoming seen by backward elements as a fifth column serving the PRC state. This is all the more so since the Australian media and mainstream politicians have made hysterical claims that a “large number” of Chinese people in Australia are acting as agents of the PRC. As much as relatively liberal stalwarts of the anti-communist, China-bashing campaign, like Political Editor of The Sydney Morning Herald, Peter Hartcher, try to draw a distinction between China and the Australian Chinese community, the reality is that ever since the triumph of China’s 1949 anti-capitalist revolution, anti-communist hostility to Red China and “Yellow Peril” xenophobic fear of East Asian-origin people have fed into each other. Racism and anti-communist hatred of Red China are tightly intertwined because both are irrational ideologies foisted on the masses by the ruling class in order to deceive and divide the toiling masses and keep them subdued. Thus, often the most rabid in attacking the PRC are also the same ones who most fervently push racist agendas. For example the most extreme anti-PRC federal government parliamentarian is hard-right, Christian fundamentalist Andrew Hastie. It was Hastie who on May 22 used parliamentary privilege to launch a hysterical tirade accusing the Chinese Communist Party of covertly seeking to influence Australia’s media, universities and politics. A month prior to this rant, this same Liberal MP was at the forefront of the white supremacist campaign for a special race-based visa to give white South African farmers refugee status on the ridiculous basis that they are being “persecuted.” Hastie is also notorious for criticising the Islamic community in Australia. He has become a hero amongst racist media commentators like Andrew Bolt and the 2GB sty of shock jocks for his militant opposition to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act that makes it unlawful to insult someone on the basis of their race, colour, nationality or ethnic origin. Although, since it is overseen by a legal system that itself is racist, this law has done little to protect minorities against abuse, the charge against Section 18C has become a cause celebré of extreme racists who want their “right” to offend non-white people legally enshrined.

Meanwhile, anti-communist opponents of the PRC within the Australian Chinese community have chosen to make an alliance with white supremacists. Thus, supporters of the U.S. government-funded, ultra-right wing group, Falun Gong (sometimes known as Falun Dafa) and other anti-PRC Chinese organisations have been joining Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party, despite anti-Asian racism being a foundation stone of that outfit. A Falun Gong activist, Shan Ju Lin, who likes to rant that Australia is being taken over by the Communist Party of China, was even selected as a Queensland state candidate for One Nation. She endorsed her leader Pauline Hanson’s attacks on the Asian community [9]. Presumably, this first ever Asian-origin candidate for this xenophobic, anti-Asian party believes that she is a “good Asian” because she is stridently opposed to the PRC and because she “understands” why people like Pauline Hanson attack Asian migrants. Shan Ju Lin was later dis-endorsed as a One Nation candidate only when she made a homophobic comment that was so fanatical that even Pauline Hanson found it an embarrassment to her party. Meanwhile, some Falun Gong members also joined the fascist Party for Freedom. Four years ago, Falun Gong representatives were even guest speakers at a China-bashing film night in Sydney put on by this white supremacist outfit! [10]. The practice of anti-PRC activists in the Chinese community promoting extreme white supremacists is happening, too, in other Western countries. In Germany, the German-language edition of Falun Gong’s newspaper, Epoch Times, specializes in running negative stories about refugees [11] and in promoting the racist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party [12] and the even more extreme, neo-Nazi NPD party [13].

Above Left: The 8 April 2019 episode of the ABC Four Corners documentary program was devoted to hysterical claims that Communist China was “interfering” in “Australia’s democracy.” The main source for much of the material in the program was hard-right, Liberal parliamentarian Andrew Hastie, who is known for his stoking of Islamophobia. It was fitting that the China-bashing ABC documentary featuring Hastie came on exactly the first anniversary of the racist rally in Perth calling for “refugee status” for white South African farmers in which Hastie was the fêted speaker (Above Right). Shot through with racist placards (Below Left), like those calling to “Let the Right Ones In” – i.e. let in wealthy, white agricultural business owners and not dark-skinned refugees from South Asia, the Middle East and Africa – violent white supremacist activists made up a sizable proportion of this rally championed by Hastie. Below Right: A body of one of the 51 Muslim people murdered in Christchurch by an Australian white supremacist just three weeks before the Four Corners documentary featuring Andrew Hastie was aired. In Australia, anti-communist China bashing has always gone hand in hand with racist xenophobia.

Despite the fact that the Cold War-style campaign against Red China is avidly driven by hard-right racists and their allies, some nominally socialist groups in Australia, even though they are avowedly staunch opponents of racism, have joined the anti-PRC crusade. These groups such as Socialist Alternative, Solidarity, Socialist Alliance and the Melbourne-based Socialist Party are, in practice, not communists but left social-democrats. They recoil in horror at the stern measures that workers states – like the PRC – operating in a still capitalist-dominated world need to take in order to defend socialistic rule. Thus, they refuse to defend the PRC from hostile capitalist attack and invent a theory that the PRC is actually just another capitalist country (or “state capitalist”) to justify this stance. And their hostility to the PRC is so great that they are prepared to contribute to the hysteria against her even though this anti-PRC, anti-communist campaign is a part of what is fueling racist hostility to the Chinese community within Australia. Thus, they not only act in the same way as do right-wing Chinese exile groups like Falun Dafa but ally with some left-wing small-l liberal, anti-PRC elements within the Chinese community. The latter, while priding themselves on being “progressive” and “anti-colonial”, are quietly so comfortable with their upper-middle class social position that they share the same hostility to “Communist China” as the capitalist White Australia establishment that they claim to oppose. Moreover, many are hostile to the PRC for the same reasons as their more right-wing, anti-PRC allies within the Chinese community. That is, they are yuppy descendants of the former capitalist and landlord exploiting classes of China that were either kicked out of power by the 1949 anti-capitalist revolution or who fled to Taiwan to grab that island following the 1949 Communist victory on the mainland. Others descend from the criminal-infested, capitalist elite of Hong Kong – or the privileged upper middle-class layers around them – who were able to maintain their domination of that enclave through 155 years of servile collaboration with British imperialism. Although these left-liberal, ethnic Chinese opponents of the PRC have pretensions about being “progressive,” their whole outlook with respect to China is shaped by the feeling that it is still they and their ilk who have “inherited” the “right” to be the rulers of China and not the supposedly “uncouth” masses asserting “mob rule” through the Communist Party of China. If these people looked at themselves closely in the political mirror, the best, most sincerely “anti-colonial” of them would be horrified at how much their anti-PRC activism is lockstep with the agenda of Australia’s racist rulers and their far-right shock troops.

WE NEED TO BUILD AN INTERNATIONALIST WORKERS PARTY

When one is aware of what is inciting anti-Chinese racism then one is able to evaluate the political groups that claim to “support the Chinese community.” A few politicians eager for votes realise that they cannot simply ignore the concerns about racism from Chinese communities given that people of Chinese background make up over 5% of Australia’s population. Thus, at the October 14 commemoration of the 19th century anti-Chinese riots there were three politicians present from the ALP (and as far as we could tell no representatives from any other political party other than ourselves). These politicians spoke at the event and condemned the past anti-Chinese riots. One of the Labor politicians even spoke about the danger of anti-Chinese racism today. That is well and good. However, that’s what these politicians were saying to an audience entirely composed of the Chinese community and their supporters. It was easy to make those comments to such an audience. The question then is what are these same politicians saying to the broader Australian population about issues connected with anti-Chinese racism? The answer is that they are part of a political party that partakes in pouring into society all three ingredients of the fuel that is powering anti-Chinese racism. The Labor Party refuses to seriously challenge the right-wing Coalition’s scapegoating of immigrants for unemployment, poor services and inadequate infrastructure; and sometimes (as in the case of Luke Foley) even tries to outdo the conservatives on this. Secondly, the ALP is at the forefront of promoting economic nationalism: especially that which is aimed against guest workers and against Chinese steel imports. Thirdly, the ALP – and the anti-PRC, nominally socialist groups that tail after them – is just as committed as the right-wing government to pursuing a policy of political and military hostility to the PRC. At times they have even been more hawkish than the Liberals in pushing for the Australian Navy to provocatively sail through PRC-claimed waters off China’s coast.

So working class Chinese people should not put their trust in the ALP. Let us never forget that the ALP was founded on the basis of ardent support for the White Australia Policy and extreme economic nationalism. However, Chinese workers in Australia, like workers of all ethnicities, certainly do need a workers party. Just not one like the ALP that accepts the capitalist order and, thus, imbibes all the reactionary ideologies that go with it. What we need instead is a party thoroughly opposed to capitalist rule. Such a party would necessarily stand by those states created through the overturn of capitalist rule – like the Peoples Republic of China. A party committed to the struggle against the capitalist order would also value above all else the unity of the working class across race and national lines. It would be fiercely internationalist, standing actively against economic nationalism and campaigning energetically against all forms of racism.

THE THREAT OF A FUTURE TAKEOVER OF POWER
BY HITLER-STYLE EXTREME RACISTS

The growing number of racist attacks on the streets of Australia comes in the context of the frightening reality that racist, far-right groups have been growing throughout most of the world (China itself is actually a lone exception to this trend among large countries). In Australia, fascist groups under the banner of “Reclaim Australia” held large, race-hate rallies in 2015 and 2016. Although that movement’s main stated enemy was the Muslim community, their demonstrations were actually aimed against all non-white people. Meanwhile, the posters put up last year in Melbourne universities threatening Chinese students (referred to earlier in this article) was the work of a neo-Nazi group calling itself Antipodean Resistance. Now, in an especially worrying development, a violent white supremacist group linked to that outfit has established a paramilitary training centre in Ashfield (at 34 Thomas St), a centre of Sydney’s ethnic Chinese community [14]. This is a serious physical threat to the entire Chinese community in Sydney and, indeed, to all people of colour – especially to those living in the Inner West, Southwest and Western suburbs of Sydney.

Although people from ethnic minority groups in Australia are subject to a very large number of attacks from garden-variety, racist rednecks – that is, racists who do not necessarily consciously subscribe to a far-right political agenda – in other countries, actual far-right political movements have been growing even faster than here. In Austria, Switzerland, the U.S., Italy, Israel, Brazil, India and Hungary, hard-right forces are either in government or part of governing coalitions. Although actual fascism – which involves the violent dispersal of all independent trade unions and left-wing, pro-workers political parties and open systematic terror against minority communities – has not yet over-run these countries, the ascendancy of hard right forces there have emboldened fascists and rednecks to unleash ever more brazen racist attacks. In the U.S., for example, Trump’s rise has seen an increase in violent attacks and verbal abuse against Muslims, blacks, Asians and Hispanics. In August last year, the U.S. had a mass racist riot that could be considered a modern day, American version of Australia’s mid-19th century Lambing Flat riots. Hundreds of neo-Nazis and other extreme white racists, many armed with semi-automatic weapons, rampaged through the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia chanting racist slogans and violently assaulting anti-racist counter-protesters. One of the racists participating in the far-right event deliberately rammed his car at high speed into a crowd of counter-protesters murdering anti-racist activist, Heather Heyer, and injuring 40 other people. Then, just four months ago, the German city of Chemnitz had a horrific racist riot that even more closely resembled the Lambing Flat riots. Seizing on the death in Chemnitz of a man during an alleged fight with immigrants, thousands of fascists descended on the city chanting “foreigners out” and giving Nazi salutes. The neo-Nazis rampaged through the city bashing any person of colour they could find. Terrified immigrants stayed locked in their houses for days. Although the 1990 capitalist reunification of Germany triggered an increase in neo-Nazi violence, Germany has not seen a racist rampage of the type seen in Chemnitz since the days of Hitler’s Third Reich!

August 2018, Germany: A modern day version of the Lambing Flat riots. Thousands of Neo-Nazis and other violent racists rampage through the city of Chemnitz chanting “foreigners out” and giving Nazi salutes. The neo-Nazis bashed any person of colour they could find as terrified immigrants stayed locked in their houses for days. Germany has not seen a racist rampage of the scale seen in Chemnitz since the days of Hitler’s Third Reich!

The strength of racist gangs in the Chemnitz and Charlottesville events shows that there is a real danger that in the future – likely during another serious economic crisis like the late-2000s Great Recession – we could be subject to not just more racist rampages but, in one or a number of countries, we could be hit with the actual takeover of political power by a violent racist movement; in other words the ascendancy to power of Hitler-style fascists! If far-right groups have, thus far, not grown as fast in Australia as they have in certain other countries it is only because Australia did not suffer a deep recession like much of the rest of the capitalist world during the late 2000s – early 2010s global economic crisis. Racist forces can grow quickly during such times because, if the working class movement fails to strongly put forward a program of class struggle resistance to job slashing by business owners, the far right’s false blaming of minorities for unemployment and economic insecurity can gain traction.

The sole reason that Australia did not suffer a major recession during the last global economic crisis is because of China. During that crisis, the PRC’s booming state-owned enterprises continued to purchase large amounts of Australian exports which in turn kept the whole Australian economy afloat. It is ironic, especially given the Australian ruling class’ hostility to Red China and her state-owned enterprises in particular, that it is the PRC’s socialistic public sector enterprises that are holding up Australia’s capitalist economy. Yet, this current reality will not last forever. The PRC government is deliberately moving the focus of the Chinese economy away from low-end manufacturing and fossil fuel-based power and towards services, renewable energy, high-tech industries, advanced manufacturing and information technology. Therefore, China will gradually have lower demand for Australian iron ore, coal and liquefied natural gas. Thus, should Australia remain under capitalist rule, eventually, even the PRC’s roaring socialistic economy will not be able to save it from the global economic crises that are inherent to the capitalist system – crises that are becoming noticeably deeper as the system increasingly decays. And when such a crisis hits this country, what then? Post-1788 Australia is already a country blighted by deep-seated racism and shaped by the genocidal dispossession of Aboriginal people and by last century’s official White Australia Policy. In the absence of a powerful mobilisation by the working class movement to defend workers’ jobs and rights, the onset of a major economic crisis in Australia could lead to the rapid growth of extreme racist, fascist forces and eventually (perhaps two major recessions from now) … their actual coming to political power! This may seem unthinkable. However, let us not forget that this is precisely what happened in Germany, Italy, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Croatia and Bulgaria at various times during the early-mid part of last century.

All the intended victims of fascists in Australia should be concerned about this possibility: Aboriginal people, people of Asian, African, Pacific Islander and Middle Eastern heritage, Muslims, Jews, LGBTI people, leftists, trade unionists, the disabled and the homeless. People of Asian background – and the Chinese community in particular – should be aware that they will likely be near the very front of the firing line (and this could be in the very literal sense!) if Hitler-style fascism were to gain the ascendancy in Australia. To know this one only has to see how much Asian-origin people – alongside Muslims and African youth – are at the centre of the hostile agitation of current Australian fascist groups.

It is worth analysing the different aspects of fascist rule and comparing how that relates to the Chinese community in today’s Australia with how it impacted on the main (but far from sole) ethnic community persecuted by Hitler’s Nazis, the Jewish people. There are four main agendas of fascist forces. Firstly, to smash all independent trade unions and all working class-based, or other left-wing, political organisations. Secondly, to use terror to drive out, if not completely exterminate, racial minorities. Thirdly, to implement extreme protectionist measures and other stern economic nationalist policies. Fourthly, to wage war to crush workers states. Let us first look at how these four aspects of the fascist program played out for the Jewish minority in Nazi Germany. The trade unions and left-wing parties crushed by Hitler were led by people of different ethnicity, mostly by ethnic Germans as they made up the overwhelming majority of the country but also by some Jewish people. So, this aspect of the Nazi program did not directly target Jewish people in particular. However, part of the Nazi’s stated reason for waging war against Jewish people was that they were considered to be prone to sympathy for the political Left. As for the second aspect of fascism, horrific terror against racial minorities, the Nazis, as is well known, particularly aimed this against the Jewish community who were the largest racial minority in the country as well as against Roma (who are commonly but inappropriately referred to as “Gypsies”), people of mixed African-German background and, later, Poles. As the Nazis and their allies took over more of Europe, they followed up their ghastly crimes within Germany with even larger-scale slaughter of Jews, Roma and Slavs throughout Europe. Now, the economic nationalist agenda of the Nazis was especially aimed against Germany’s French, British and other imperialist rivals. So this aspect of fascism did not directly fuel the war against the Jewish people. However, it did contribute to possessing a chunk of the German masses with the extreme nationalist spirit that helped push them into committing the most horrific crimes against non-German peoples. The fourth major aspect of Nazism, a fanatical drive to crush socialistic workers states, meant in practice waging war on the one workers’ state existing at the time: the Soviet Union. As Jewish people had been badly persecuted in Tsarist Russia, many Jews participated in the October 1917 Socialist Revolution in Russia that led to the creation of the Soviet workers state. The fascists thus linked communism to Jewish people. The Nazis described their war against the Soviet Union as a war against “Jew-Bolsheviks.”

Now, let us analyse how these four agendas of fascism would play out for the Chinese community here if fascist forces were to, in the future, gain the ascendancy in Australia. Firstly, as in Nazi Germany, all communist and social-democratic parties would be obliterated and all independent trade unions crushed. This would target worker and left-wing activists of all ethnicities. However, given that, even now, the Chinese community is labelled as being populated by a large number of supporters of Communist Party-run China, any war against Australian pro-communist movements would inevitably stir up particular hostility to people of Chinese ancestry. The second agenda of fascism – to drive out or exterminate racial minorities – would target Aboriginal people and all people of colour. Given that people of Chinese background make up the largest non-white ethnic minority in Australia, the fascist drive for racial “purity” would inevitably make Chinese people one of the main enemies of this crusade. The extreme protectionist agenda of fascism would hit all countries and peoples who Australia imported from, who invested in Australia or who worked here as guest workers. Given that China is the biggest source of Australian imports, is reputed to be (though this, as we have pointed out earlier, is actually far from true) the main country investing in Australia and is one of the bigger sources of temporary visa workers, the obsessive economic nationalist agenda of fascism, should it engulf Australia, would incite hatred against the Chinese community who would be linked to the “big, bad China” that will be hysterically accused of “taking away Australian jobs” and “buying up Australia.” Now, what about fascism’s compulsion to go to war to smash workers states? In today’s world, Hitler’s drive to destroy the Soviet Union, then the only workers state, would be replaced with a compulsion to destroy today’s largest socialistic state, the Peoples Republic of China. Even right now, the overwhelming majority of the capitalist ruling class in the U.S. and Australia want to see the downfall of socialistic rule in China. However, when the Western world again enters a period of deep economic crisis, precisely the period when it is possible for fascists to gain the ascendancy, the ruling class’ desperation to smash the PRC workers state would reach fever pitch. When their system is in such a crisis at home, the only way that their economy could survive is if they have access to a gigantic, new source of labour to exploit – which capitalist restoration in China would enable – and decisive control of the vast Chinese market that they thus far have not been able to dominate. Moreover, the deeper that capitalism lurches into economic crisis, the more the capitalist rulers cannot tolerate the existence of a successful socialistic model which they know would give their “own” working class masses “bad ideas” on what needs to be done to relieve the crisis. Indeed, part of the complex of circumstances that would facilitate the ascendancy of fascists would be that a section of the capitalist elite, in the midst of an economic crisis, should decide that they, albeit with many misgivings, entrust administration of their state to the fascists in order for the latter to use extreme nationalism and repression to herd the population towards military confrontation with Red China. And given that the ascendancy of fascists in Australia would likely be part of similar developments in at least a few other Western countries, including, most probably, the U.S. where it is plainly obvious that fascist forces have been gaining strength, then the alliance between the U.S. and Australia when both countries are under fascist rule would very likely lead to the ANZUS allies indeed attempting a war to destroy Red China. Such a war, or even the active preparation for one, will inevitably contribute to severe persecution of the Chinese community in Australia. Let us not forget that during World War II, the Australian government imprisoned in harsh conditions nearly all ethnic Japanese civilians living here – including many who worked in the pearl diving industry, people born in Australia and those of mixed Japanese-White Australian ancestry [15]. The Curtin Labor government imprisoned over 4,300 Japanese civilians in all, most of whom were forcibly deported to Japan after the war. And Australia was not even under fascist rule then! Given the agenda of fascists and the particular history of anti-Chinese racism in Australia, one would expect a possible future, fascist regime in Australia to persecute the Chinese community even more cruelly during the context of active preparations for a war against Red China.

There is, however, an important difference between the Jewish community in 1930s Germany and the Chinese community in today’s Australia. At the time of Hitler’s ascendancy, Jewish people only made up some 0.75% of the German population. By contrast over 5% of Australia’s residents have Chinese ancestry and nearly a quarter of Australia’s population are people of colour from various backgrounds. That naturally means that it would, theoretically, be more difficult for a future fascist regime in Australia to commit genocide against the Chinese community or other non-white communities in the way that the Nazis mass murdered the Jewish community. More difficult but, unfortunately, far from
impossible. Let us not forget that as well as murdering Jews, Roma, Afro-Germans and Poles, the Nazi regime brutally persecuted and smashed the German Communist Party, the Germany Social Democratic Party and the trade unions who together had some 15 million members and supporters when Hitler came to power. The Nazis were able to carry out this repression by first targeting one group and then relying on their other intended victims remaining passive and cowered or otherwise not showing solidarity with the immediately targeted group before moving onto their next target. If the nightmare scenario of a fascist takeover in Australia eventuates, we can expect that the new fascist regime would first go after a smaller and thus more vulnerable target – like, say, the African community who are being so viciously vilified even today – and in doing so hone their methods of repression and propaganda. Hoping that their future targets – like the Chinese community and the trade unions – remain passive and cowered and fail to show active solidarity with this first targeted group, the fascists will succeed in their initial repression, strike fear in the hearts of their other intended victims and gain momentum for the smashing of their next target. That is why when facing violent racists, passivity ends up being akin to suicide. Moreover, just as fascists in power rely on passivity, cowardice and a lack of active solidarity between their intended victims to carry out their murderous agenda, they also rely on all this to come to power in the first place. That is why in a world where violent far-right groups are gaining strength, all the intended victims of the fascists must show courage by coming together in active mobilisations to stamp out fascist threats. We need to stamp them out now before we have to face an enemy that has grown terrifyingly in momentum and numbers. A good start would be for the trade union movement, leftists, the Chinese community and other non-white communities present in Western Sydney to unite in action to sweep away the military training base that the extreme racists have established in Sydney’s Ashfield.

WHAT IS TO BE DONE?

In the face of intensifying oppression of Aboriginal people, growing anti-Chinese racism and vicious attacks against the African community, Muslims, South Asian origin people and all people of colour in Australia, we cannot leave it to the police, courts, governments or local councils to protect targeted communities. History has shown that these state bodies in Australia – no matter which party is holding government – invariably protect racist groups. We only have to look what happened today at Melbourne’s St Kilda Beach. A group of far-right extremists started threateningly videoing African youth kicking a soccer ball around and when they protested against the racists’ provocative actions, the police intervened. However, the person that the cops arrested was not one of the extreme racists but one of the African youths who was being harassed! The police, to the cheers of the far-right racists, pepper sprayed and held to the ground this African youth, causing the young man to vomit. The police had the same slant when anti-racist counter-demonstrators opposed the “Reclaim Australia” mobilisations held by extreme racists in 2015-16 when police protected the racists and violently attacked anti-racist protesters. Indeed, at the 18 July 2015 race-hate rally in Melbourne, a policeman even publicly high-fived a member of the extreme racist United Patriots Front.

The state enforcement institutions in capitalist Australia ultimately serve the ultra-rich, big end of town who need racism as it keeps the masses that they exploit divided and distracted. Moreover, as we know all too well, the government and state enforcement organs are themselves purveyors of racism. That is why it must be our multi-racial trade unions, drawing together all working class people and all the targeted communities that must act to oppose the racist attacks of today and retard the future threat of a fascist takeover. This is a matter of not only protecting communities targeted by racist violence but of defending the class interests of the working class. Racism is a mortal threat to the trade union movement and the struggle for workers’ rights. By dividing working class people racism undermines the unity which is so crucial to any working class people’s struggle for wages, improved working conditions, jobs and public housing. That is why it is in the very interests of the workers movement to be at the forefront of the struggle to oppose racist attacks and to resist the threat from violent far-right outfits.

The working class movement and racial minorities must come together with the following action program:

Mass mobilisations of trade unionists standing alongside people from Aboriginal, Chinese, other Asian, African, and Middle Eastern backgrounds as well as Muslims, Jews, LGBTIQ communities and leftists must stop the fascists when they try to mobilise in public. It is difficult to mobilise against the numerous, disparate acts of racist violence by garden-variety rednecks that occur every single day. However, by dealing severe blows in public to the politically racist elements, we can send a strong message to the unorganised racists that it is not in their interests to stick their ugly necks out and commit racist attacks. A priority right now is to get rid of the violence training base that the extreme racists have established at 34 Thomas St, Ashfield.

All racist attacks of any kind must be opposed no matter which community they target. Attacks on one community, when unopposed, give racists the taste of blood that will inevitably encourage them to target other racial minorities as well. That means there must be determined struggle against the state’s systematic oppression of Aboriginal people – oppression which leads to so many black people being killed in state custody by racist police and prison guards. We must also stand with the African communities that are being so viciously scapegoated today and with Muslim people who have been copping ongoing racist attacks over the last two decades. We must fight to free the refugees, stop all deportations and win the rights of citizenship for all refugees, guest workers and overseas students.

New, ever more repressive laws in Australia, which can be used to persecute minorities and thus further incite racist sentiments, must be opposed. These include the “foreign interference law” passed in June that aims to witch-hunt pro-PRC Chinese people, the various anti-terror laws that are so draconian that they often lead to Muslim people innocent of any crime being victimised (such as student of Sri Lankan Muslim background, Mohamed Kamer Nizamdeen, who was recently falsely imprisoned for four weeks in harsh conditions on blatantly false terrorism charges) and the myriad of measures associated with the government’s racist “Intervention” into Aboriginal communities.

We must counter the government and mainstream media’s propaganda blitz against socialistic China. This campaign of lies not only “rationalises” the ruling class’ measures against a workers state, the PRC, but inevitably ends up inciting hostility to the Chinese community in Australia as well. The anti-PRC propaganda blitz can only be effectively opposed by pointing to the class nature of the PRC as a state that, for all its deformities and harmful concessions to capitalists, serves the interests of working class people. Trotskyist Platform (TP) is proud to have built actions for public housing in Australia that have favourably pointed to the PRC’s spectacular building of public housing over the last decade as an example of what is needed here to ensure affordable rental accommodation for working class people [16]. We have promoted the slogan: “Massively Increase Public Housing – Just Like Socialistic China Is Doing!” TP has also initiated united-front eemonstrations supporting particular crackdowns by the PRC authorities on Australian capitalist exploiters operating within China. When executives – including greedy Australian bigwig Stern Hu – of part Australian-owned mining behemoth Rio Tinto were sentenced to lengthy jail terms in China in 2010 for ripping-off PRC public sector enterprises and when Aussie billionaire James Packer’s high-flying executives were prosecuted by Chinese authorities for corruption in 2017, we cheered these anti-capitalist actions [17] [18], saying “China is Cracking Down on Private Sector Corporate Greed. Working Class People: Let’s Do The Same Here!”

When the PRC succeeds in its campaign to pull all people out of extreme poverty in two years time – which it is on track to do – supporters of the PRC and opponents of anti-Chinese racism should organise demonstrations here to welcome this victory for working class people the world over. This will not only help to counter anti-PRC propaganda but, by pointing out how the PRC’s state-owned banks and state-owned enterprises and its public housing drive were key to the success of this poverty-alleviation campaign, we will help spur the badly needed struggles in Australia against privatisations, for the nationalisation of the banks and for a massive increase in public housing.

We must actively campaign against economic nationalist proposals. Protectionism does not save jobs but, instead, by pitting workers in one country against another, makes it harder for workers to unite to stop their bosses from slashing jobs. In opposition to economic nationalism we must advocate a program to save workers’ jobs that is based on class struggle actions to prevent profitable businesses retrenching workers.

There must be struggle against the conditions of unemployment, casualisation of labour and inadequacy of infrastructure that provide the climate for the growth of racist movements. To win secure, permanent jobs for all, we need to build a movement to force capitalist business owners to increase hiring of permanent employees at the expense of their fat profits. We also need to demand a massive increase in funding for public hospitals, public housing, public schools, childcare and public transport financed through confiscating the wealth of the big end of town.

All our struggles for a better life for working class people come up against the very essence of the capitalist system which operates not on what is needed by the masses but on what is most profitable for individual, wealthy business owners. Meanwhile, all struggles against racial oppression come up against state enforcement organs that were created to enforce the exploitation of the working class and to administer the racism that is needed to help ensure this. Therefore, in the course of all campaigns against racist attacks and for improvement of the conditions of working class people we need to popularise the need to replace the capitalist system with a system based on socialist, public ownership of the economy administered by a workers state.

In all these struggles, politically conscious working-class people – whether of Chinese, Aboriginal, African, Middle Eastern, Indian, Filipino, Vietnamese, Nepalese, other Asian, Pacific Islander, Latin American or White Australian background – must be the spearhead. However, we can only implement this agenda if we simultaneously struggle for a new program to gain the ascendancy in our trade union movement and the broader working class: a program that rejects economic nationalism and that refuses to buy into illusions that the parliamentary and enforcement institutions of the current, capitalist, state can help workers win a better life. We must also turn our back on the current leadership of the workers movement’s practice of supporting the Australian capitalist ruling class’ reactionary foreign policy agenda, which ranges from hostility to socialistic states like the PRC and DPRK to supporting Israel’s brutal oppression of Palestinian people. Our working class organisations need a program based on militant class struggle, on firm opposition to the racist ruling class and its domestic and international agendas and on the building of genuine unity between workers of all races: local, guest and international workers. This is what is needed to not only make our unions weapons in the fight against racism but to turn them into centres of militant class-struggle resistance against job cuts, casualisation of labour and low wages.

2 May 2014, Brisbane: Extreme racists (encircled in white) cower in the face of trade union power. A large contingent of unionised construction workers join with other anti-fascists to sweep away an attempted mobilisation by a violent racist group. Since trade union strength depends on unity above all else, the workers movement has an interest in unleashing its power to spearhead the struggle against violent racist outfits.

THE STRUGGLE FOR GENUINE INTERNATIONALISM
WITHIN THE WORKING CLASS MOVEMENT

The fight to drive out racist and economic nationalist influences from the workers movement and the Left will be a difficult struggle requiring hard work and persistence. For what needs to be opposed are not only the most overt forms of White Australia racism but it’s slightly more disguised, yet all the more pernicious, forms. To understand this better we should look back at the event that remains iconic to the current Australian union movement: the 1854 Eureka Rebellion by gold miners in Ballarat. The rebellion is seen as a powerful example of the oppressed standing up for their rights and thus as a struggle that the union movement bases itself on. Today, many unions carry the flag used in the Eureka Stockade. The Eureka Rebellion was, indeed, overall progressive as the miners were subjected to an unfair tax and heavy repression. Taking part in the struggle alongside Irish, Scottish, Welsh and English immigrants were people from various parts of continental Europe and North America. There were also a small number of non-white people involved and two of the thirteen people who faced sedition charges after the uprising included a black Jamaican man, James McFie Campbell, and a black American man, John Joseph. The latter was deservedly given a hero’s reception – even being carried around the streets of Melbourne in a chair – by those who supported the struggle. Yet, it is telling to reflect upon the two particular ethnic groups who were not part of the Eureka Rebellion. Firstly, Aboriginal people were not part of the rebellion as they were largely prevented from being gold miners in the first place. Aboriginal people were, instead, being subjected to murderous terror at the hands of the colonial authorities. Secondly, miners from China, by far the largest group of non-white people present on the goldfields, were not brought into the struggle. At the time, there was much racist/economic nationalist hostility to the Chinese miners from many of the white miners. Thus, the rebel mine prospectors made no effort to reach out to the Chinese miners. Instead, the Ballarat Reform League that organised the Eureka Rebellion was “open to men of all nations” except Chinese [19]. In the wake of the Eureka movement, a courageous Black American rebel was rightly féted as a hero, yet the rebellion excluded the largest non-white ethnic group present on the goldfields. Here was a striking example of the more hypocritical form of white supremacy: where all races are welcome except any group large enough to present a serious threat to what is seen as the “rightful”, dominant position of white people. This very serious flaw, in the overall still supportable Eureka Stockade struggle, is why the Eureka Rebellion is celebrated not only by many unions and left-wing groups but is also, so troublingly, claimed – albeit quite dishonestly – by most extreme white-supremacist outfits.

In the Eureka Rebellion and the mid-1800s goldfields more broadly, we see how racism is heavily inter-twined with economic nationalism. Minority communities that were not large enough to be seen as a danger to the interests of the white gold prospectors were tolerated by those who were not extreme racists but the largest non-white group – and one that had, what is more, developed efficient, co-operative mining techniques – was bitterly opposed by many as a threat to their livelihoods. Fast forward now to today. Today, there are some left-wing small-l liberals and social democrats who will proudly oppose racist persecution of most oppressed racial minority groups but they will do little to oppose attacks on the largest non-white racial groups present in Australia, Asians and in particular Chinese background people. At worst these people, while proudly wearing the badge of “anti-racism,” will even buy into economic nationalist opposition to supposedly “excessive Chinese investment in Australia” and “cheap” Asian labour entering as guest workers. Yet, at the same time, these left-wing small-l liberals and social democrats will, very correctly, state opposition to the terrible racist attacks being unleashed against the African and Muslim communities. They will also be most determined to show their opposition to the horrific ongoing persecution of Aboriginal people (although how much these soft-lefts actually contribute to the struggle for Aboriginal rights is a very different story). It is kind of a form of the “anyone but the Chinese” prejudice that afflicted many gold miners in 1850s Victoria being played out today – albeit in softer form. Today’s left-wing small-l liberals and social democrats do not feel “threatened” by small minority communities like Muslims and Africans and, thus, they do sincerely defend these persecuted communities – as they certainly should – just as supporters of the Eureka Rebellion at the time embraced the black American rebel hero, John Joseph. Similarly, some left-wing small-l liberals and social democrats are happy to join with staunch Aboriginal activists and committed socialists in proclaiming slogans supporting Aboriginal sovereignty and Aboriginal leadership. These radical proclamations are, however, made in the, for these small-l liberals and social democrats, comfortable knowledge that such laudable demands are not about to be realized in the short term because genocide and severe persecution have greatly diminished both the size and the current political-economic clout of this country’s First Peoples (for this reason even opposition leader Bill Shorten feels comfortable to regularly state that Australia “is, was and always will be Aboriginal land” even while fully backing the continued theft of this Aboriginal land by mining and pastoral capitalists). Would these same elements truly support the complete smashing of the racist White Australia status quo that will finally liberate Aboriginal people from the brutal oppression that they face when, in the future, united revolutionary struggle by the multi-racial working class and Aboriginal militants makes that actually immediately achievable? A good indication of the answer to this question can be seen by examining the extent to which these progressive small-l liberals and social democrats today oppose racist attacks on that group of racial minorities – Asians (and Chinese in particular) – large enough (and linked to hundreds-of-millions-strong populations in Australia’s Asia-Pacific neighbourhood and also to a powerful home country in the case of migrants from the PRC) to right now plausibly be seen as able to disturb the supreme position of the White Australia establishment in all economic, cultural and political matters. And here we find many left-wing small-l liberals and social democrats wanting. To be sure the inconsistencies and hypocrisies of their stances on issues of racism often reflect subconscious feelings rather than a fixed, thought-through perspective. Yet it is clear that they still have a way to go to truly break from a white supremacist mentality.

However, what makes it possible to win the best layers of the working class to a truly internationalist standpoint is the fact that such an outlook is what the workers movement actually needs to advance its very own interests. The working class needs genuine unity, based on equality across race and national lines, in order to ensure it is as strong a force as possible to fight for its jobs, working conditions and social services. It is this basic truth that is the lever that an internationalist workers party uses to lift the level of fighting inter-racial and cross-border unity of the workers movement.

We need to also stress that fighting to unify the working class in today’s Australia across racial lines should be far easier than it would have been to unify the miners during the mid-nineteenth century gold rush. Why? Because although the miners of the Eureka Stockade – and the gold rush more broadly – were oppressed by heavy taxes and police bullying, they were not actual wage workers toiling together for wages from common exploiting bosses. Rather, they were self-employed producers who kept for their own selves what they produced – after paying out taxes and expenses. In effect, they were each little small businessmen. And although they united with each other – but excluded Chinese miners – during the Eureka rebellion against cruel government policies, they often also had the individualistic, self-centred outlook of small businessmen. Indeed, their economic position as individual self-employed producers also formed the material basis for the anti-Chinese racism within their numbers. To the extent that the miners did not embrace collective gold prospecting, theoretically every other gold miner working in the area that a particular miner was searching for gold in was a rival. The more other gold prospectors there were, the less gold would be left over for the miner to collect himself. This meant that any large group of miners seen as outsiders would be felt as a threat to their livelihoods. This large group of “outsiders” were, of course, the Chinese. Moreover, the fact that the co-operative mining techniques of Chinese miners made them more efficient at finding gold than their white-skinned counterparts only enraged prejudiced, white miners even more. The despicable xenophobia of the many gold prospectors who were racist was rooted in the hard economic reality that the more gold found by outsiders – and specifically the Chinese miners – the less there was left for them. However, such an equation does not exist for wage workers. Indeed for wage workers, it is the very inverse equation that holds true. Workers’ income comes from selling their physical and/or mental labour power to the business-owning capitalists for wages. Thus, very unlike the relationship between individual small businessmen participating in the same industry, wage workers are not engaged in dog-eat-dog competition with their fellow workers. If less workers are to be employed in a particular sector this will not, in the least, lead automatically to increases in the standard of living of the remaining workers. What is needed to improve the income of workers is class struggle against their bosses to force the latter to hand over a greater share of the fruit of workers’ labour back to the workers themselves rather than being plundered as profits by the business owners. To wage this class struggle, workers’ unity is the most important factor. Racial prejudice and economic nationalism – whether it is directed against Aboriginal people, against smaller racial minorities or against larger minority groups – is simply poison to the struggle for working class peoples’ rights. Put simply, whereas for the gold prospectors in 19th century Australia racially excluding any particular group of miners – which turned out to be specifically the Chinese miners – could theoretically have led to higher income for miners from the majority racial group, for wage workers in today’s Australia it is building unity across races that is needed to win higher incomes and a more secure livelihood. To be sure, there is still much racism within the workers movement in today’s Australia. However, this is not primarily an internally generated racism like it was, to a large degree, with the mid-19th century gold prospectors. Rather, it is a racism largely impregnated by ruling class politicians and the big business-owned media who are eager to divide and divert the exploited masses.

The fact that combating racial divisions is in the very material interests of workers is the reason why it is possible, through the determined and conscious effort of the most far-sighted workers and leftist intellectuals, to eventually drive out racial prejudice from the workers movement; and thus make wage workers (who make up some 65% to 70% of Australia’s workforce) into a bulwark in the struggle against racism throughout broader society. It is this material interests that workers have in inter-racial unity which is also why, even during the middle of Australia’s official White Australia Policy period, proud members of the Seamen’s Union of Australia made laudable efforts to help Chinese workers on ships frequenting Australia to establish unions and fight for their rights. These communist-inspired Australian trade unionists did this wonderful work even while the Australian union movement, as a whole, was upholding the White Australia Policy and nominally Marxist, more left-wing union leaders were less than 100% in following through on their avowed opposition to the policy.

THE CRUCIAL ROLE THAT MIGRANTS FROM THE PRC
ARE DESTINED TO PLAY WITHIN THE AUSTRALIAN WORKERS MOVEMENT

The early-mid 20th century bonds of friendship built in struggle between Chinese seamen working on ships docking in Australian ports and the best of the Australian trade unionists who supported their brave efforts at union organising helped develop crucial links between sections of the white working class and the broader Chinese community. In the same way today, Australian trade unionists from Chinese, Indian, Filipino, Nepalese, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Korean and Indonesian backgrounds can play an important role in bringing together white workers with Asian-based, migrant working class communities. These workers have much to contribute to the Australian workers movement in many other ways too. This is especially the case for workers in Australia originating from the Peoples Republic of China. Most working class immigrants from the PRC living in Australia tend to be, to a greater or lesser degree, sympathetic to Red China. Therefore, workers from a PRC background living in Australia can form an important link between the overall fight of the working class against the capitalist bosses and the badly needed struggles not only against anti-Chinese racism but against attacks on the socialistic PRC. A small example of this was seen in August 2016. It was then that ethnic Chinese workers who are members of the CFMEU construction workers union pushed for their union to take a stand against Channel 7’s blatantly anti-China bias in its coverage of the 2016 Olympics. This resulted in the CFMEU holding a small protest against Channel 7 in Sydney in which not only ethnic Chinese construction workers took part but also CFMEU officials and other construction workers. The rally did not openly state the class character of China as a socialistic workers state and identify this as the reason for the anti-China bias of Australia’s capitalist media. Nevertheless, by slamming the “ignorant and discriminatory” media coverage of China, the CFMEU’s action objectively took a stand with Red China. It was also welcome solidarity with discriminated against, Chinese-Australian workers who are being harassed by the anti-Chinese bigotry that is, in part, driven by the Australian capitalists’ hostility to the Peoples Republic of China. This was a rare example of our unions today taking an active stand against not only anti-Chinese racism but against anti-communist hostility to the PRC.

Although the August 2016 protest against Channel 7 over the Olympics was small, it showed the potential of PRC-origin workers in Australia to push the trade union movement here in the much needed, internationalist direction. Moreover, there is a particular characteristic of those who have previously been workers in the PRC, that is probably as yet unknown by most of their coworkers, which gives them the potential to influence the Australian workers movement in a really positive way. This is related to the reality that the Peoples Republic of China is a workers’ state – albeit one distorted by bureaucratic deformations and weakened by a level of capitalist intrusion. Since the toiling masses took over China in her 1949 anti-capitalist revolution, in China workers – and indeed everyone else – are taught that workers are the rulers of the country. As a result, workers in the PRC have a sense of entitlement – a justified feeling that political, economic and social affairs ought to be managed for their benefit. To be sure, wages are lower in China than they are in Australia. Yet that is only because China – due to its cruel neo-colonial subjugation by imperialist powers in its pre-1949 days – is still, per person, a much poorer country than Australia. For a country of its per capita income, wages in China are actually rather high, especially when the social wage that bosses are required to pay into Chinese workers’ accounts are taken into account (these include not only for China’s form of superannuation but funds for medical bills and housing expenses). Moreover, the PRC has had the fastest growing wages in the world over the last decade [20]. Now, as a huge and disparate country, there have been cases of bad sweatshop exploitation of workers in China’s private sector – especially in foreign-owned factories and in smaller workplaces. However, following the introduction in 2008 of a new pro-worker labour law, a further increase in an already very high rate of trade union membership, the wider penetration of Communist Party of China (CPC) cells into private businesses and spirited government “repression” against capitalist bosses who fail to follow labour laws or flout safety regulations, the workplace rights of private sector workers in China have considerably improved. Meanwhile, in socialistic state-owned enterprises, which dominate all the key sectors of the Chinese economy, working conditions, are in general, rather good. Workers in these enterprises have a high level of job security with retrenchments relatively rare. Certainly, the way bosses in Australia can often bully workers is unheard of in many of the PRC’s state-owned enterprises. Indeed, if Aussie capitalist bosses saw how relaxed at work many employees in China’s socialistic state-owned enterprises are, they would probably have a fit! To some degree the conditions that exist in China’s state-owned enterprises are replicated in China’s bigger private firms where CPC cells and the overall character of the state force the capitalist owners to maintain a decent work environment and dissuade them from carrying out mass layoffs. All this, combined with Chinese workers’ “sense of entitlement,” means that when workers in China are not happy with how their bosses are treating them they tend to not only go on strike but do so in a way quite different to most strikes in Australia. In Australia, strikes are disproportionately less likely in the private sector where the rate of trade union membership is much lower than amongst public sector workers. In contrast in the PRC, where the state-owned enterprises essentially belong to the people and hence have much better workplace conditions than in the private sector, a disproportionately high percentage of strikes occur in the private sector or in any public enterprises that are facing privatisation (although such attempted privatisations have been very rare in the last few years). However, the main difference in industrial action that occurs in China with the increasingly little that occurs here is in the types of action taken by striking workers. In Australia, a typical strike is associated with a stop-work meeting and in some cases a peaceful rally. In only a percentage of cases will a strike see a picket line established – usually if it is a longer running strike – which only in a portion of these instances will see the pickets actually physically stopping anyone trying to cross. In the PRC however, strike actions, from day one, typically involve workers asserting their domination over all the space surrounding the struck workplace. Here is where the sense of entitlement comes in. China’s striking workers not only picket work-site entrances but also block nearby roads and often occupy the workplace buildings. In some cases they even take their bosses hostage. In Australia, in the all too rare cases that workers engage in such China-style industrial action, rebelling workers always face denunciations by politicians, hysterical condemnation by the mainstream media and physical attack from police. Yet in China it is rare for the media and politicians to denounce striking workers. The PRC’s state-owned media are actually more likely to blame the bosses in any industrial dispute. As for the attitude of PRC courts to industrial action by workers, here is how a Western law firm advising bosses in China summarised it:

“There is a trend of an increasing number and scale of industrial actions, which is being used by the employees more and more often as a tool to assert its legal rights or negotiate better term of employment. Where the employees start a strike because of incompliance on the part of the company in relation to employee benefits and rights, PRC judicial bodies are usually protective of the employees and often uphold claims of termination without legal cause if the employer terminates the employees for organising or participating in the strike [21].”

In other words, completely opposite to the situation in Australia, PRC industrial courts are much more likely to favour striking workers than the bosses. Meanwhile, while on some occasions Chinese police and bureaucrats may attack militant action by workers during an industrial dispute, in other cases they may either turn a blind eye to such action or even support it! In some famous cases, Chinese police and government officials have even sided with private sector workers who have taken their bosses hostage and even tacitly joined in with workers in trying to pressure the seized capitalist to capitulate to the workers’ demands. This type of scenario was played out spectacularly in China’s most stormy dispute in the last decade, the July 2009 Tonghua steelworkers strike in northeastern China that opposed the privatisation of the enterprise. There, after thousands of workers not only occupied the plant but took the new private boss hostage and beat him to death, the government not only immediately reversed the privatisation but PRC state media mocked the greed of the killed capitalist boss while police chiefs involved made statements sympathetic to the rebelling workers! Needlessly to say, such responses by the state and their media to workers’ struggles has further amplified the sense of entitlement that workers in the PRC enjoy.

So what happens when some of these “entitled” workers from Red China go abroad. Well that was seen dramatically in Singapore in 2012. On 26 November of that year, nearly 180 bus drivers from China working for Singapore Mass Rapid Transit Corp (SMRT) went on strike over poor pay and living conditions. Many stayed out on strike the following day as well. The strike was especially daring given that these workers are constrained by the same conditions as guest workers in Australia – they can be sent home at any time if their bosses rip-up their employment contract. Moreover, the Chinese workers’ wild-cat action not only flouted Singapore’s harsh anti-strike laws but was done in defiance of Singapore’s National Trades Union Congress which pathetically condemned the strike. Five strike leaders ended up being jailed by the Singapore capitalist regime and 29 other strikers were sacked and deported [22]. The struggle did, however, force the bosses to make a few improvements to the housing conditions of the bus drivers. In a country with an extremely repressive capitalist regime, the daring strike by the Chinese workers had the political effect of an earthquake. This was the first strike in Singapore in nearly 27 years! Moreover, it seems to be the only major strike (there had been a “work to rule” industrial action by Singapore Airlines pilots in 1980) against a local Singapore-based company in the country’s entire 54-year post-independence history!

November 2012: Striking Chinese bus drivers outside their dormitories in Singapore. These Chinese guest workers waged Singapore’s first strike in 27 years! Imbued with the sense of entitlement that comes from having lived in a workers state, Chinese workers who migrate to Australia – especially those who have worked in China’s socialistic, state-owned enterprises – could also inject a badly needed shot of militancy to the working class movement in this country.

Potentially, the defiance shown by PRC bus drivers in Singapore can be brought to Australia too when people from the PRC migrate to Australia. This obviously applies mainly to those migrants who were workers when they lived in the PRC -rather than self-employed businesspeople or high-ranking professionals. The Chinese migrants who will be most imbued with a sense of entitlement as workers will be those who had worked in the PRC’s state-owned enterprises; and to a slighter lesser extent those who had worked in those larger private enterprises where the influence of Communist Party of China committees are greatest. In these state-owned enterprises and other enterprises where CPC influence is strong, the intervention of the PRC workers’ state to protect working conditions is greatest and China’s 2008 labour law, that gives workers a virtual veto over changes to workplace conditions, is most strictly enforced. These “entitled” workers, when they start working in Australia and are suddenly hit with a workplace environment where bosses often bully workers and where the courts, media, politicians and police are uniformly against them could well be prone to fighting back in outrage. Now that would inject a badly needed shot of militancy to the working class in this country! Here, anti-strike laws, increasing legal persecution of unions and a pro-ALP union leadership that for the most part is unwilling to defy the anti-union laws have all combined to cause the level of industrial action to fall to record low levels. This in turn has led to stagnant – and in many cases even falling – real wages, increasing heavy handedness by bosses and deteriorating working conditions.

One thing holding back many working-class PRC migrants from spearheading class struggle resistance in Australia are the restrictions on their rights that come from not holding citizenship. This make many of these migrants especially fearful of the consequences of being sacked or arrested by police (mind you none of this was enough to hold back the PRC bus drivers in Singapore!). Many recent migrants from the PRC are still permanent residents rather than citizens – held back from gaining citizenship by not only the four-year waiting period but by tough English language requirements – while a smaller number are guest workers. The other factor constraining working-class migrants from the PRC is the racist environment that they endure in this country. When coloured migrants cop racist abuse and hostility they feel intimidated, insecure and isolated. Such workers naturally then feel less confident to stand up for their rights at work. On the contrary, if migrants from the PRC see the Australian workers movement actively defending their rights and opposing racist attacks on them then they will feel emboldened to be at the forefront of militant struggles for workers’ rights. Our workers movement here desperately needs a big dose of the audacity and belligerence shown by PRC migrant workers in Singapore in 2012! So let’s help unleash that militancy by mobilising to defend Chinese communities against racist attacks.

Notes:

[1] Gavin Fernando, Anti-Asian racist signs have been discovered in Sydney’s northwest, published on news.com. au website, 13 May 2018, https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/antiasian-racist-signs-have-beendiscovered-in-sydneys-northwest/news-story/11ace169f1f14416936e3008a72b5eb1

[2] Ryan General, Chinese Consulate in Australia Warns Chinese Students of Danger After Recent Racist Attacks, published in Nextshark website, 20 December 2017, https://nextshark.com/chinese-consulate-australia-warns-chinese-students-danger-recent-racist-attacks/

[3] Josh Dye, Man allegedly targeted Asian people in Randwick rampage, published in The Sydney Morning Herald website, 18 May 2018, https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/man-allegedly-targeted-asian-people-in-randomrandwick-rampage-20180518-p4zg0m.html

[4] Heather MacDonald, A white face can be a big help in a discriminatory housing market, published in The Conversation website, 1 February 2016, http://theconversation.com/a-white-face-can-be-a-big-help-in-a-discriminatory-housing-market-52962

[5] Natarsha Kallios and Charlotte Lam, ‘We never expected this to happen in Australia’: Vandals torch Hindu temple, published in SBS News website, 18 October 2018, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/we-never-expected-this-to-happen-in-australia-vandals-torch-hindu-temple?fbclid=IwAR3fzbDDxEIRA2XMmlnK89KOeJhxqZ4Ge65o 6uu06hcaXlrpTYZuK2U60Uo

[6] Simon Thomsen, Australia’s 200 wealthiest people just got richer at 10 times current wage growth, published in Business Insider website, 24 May 2018, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/rich-list-australia-2018-2018-5

[7] Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Statistics on who invests in Australia, retrieved from DFAT website on 20 December 2018, https://dfat.gov.au/trade/resources/investment-statistics/Pages/statistics-on-who-invests-in-australia.aspx

[8] Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, China information sheet, retrieved from DFAT website on 20 December 2018, https://dfat.gov.au/trade/resources/Documents/chin.pdf

[9] Kristian Silva, One Nation’s Shan Ju Lin defends Pauline Hanson, says she fears Chinese Government will ‘take over’, published in ABC News website, 21 December 2016, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-21/one-nationcandidate-shan-ju-lin-defends-pauline-hanson/8135684

[10] Film night on Chinese government harvesting organs, published in Party for Freedom website, 6 May 2014, https://www.partyforfreedom.org.au/2014/05/06/film-night-on-chinese-government-harvesting-organs/

[11] Stefan Winterbauer, Kopp, Sputnik, Epoch Times & Co: Nachrichten aus einem rechten Paralleluniversum, published in MEEDIA website, 18 March 2016, https://meedia.de/2016/03/18/kopp-sputnik-epoch-times-conachrichten-aus-einem-rechten-paralleluniversum/

[12] Von Gastautorin and Vera Lengsfeld, AfD-Wahlkampf in Sportkleidung – Ein kleiner Sieg über den Demokratieabbau, published in Epoch Times (Germany) website, 22 September 2017, https://www.epochtimes. de/politik/deutschland/afd-wahlkampf-in-sportkleidung-ein-kleiner-sieg-ueber-den-demokratieabbau-a2223340. html?meistgelesen=1

[13] Berlin: 13-Jährige 30 Stunden lang entführt und vergewaltigt, published in Epoch Times (Germany) website, 17 January 2016, updated 8 July 2016, https://www.epochtimes.de/politik/deutschland/berlin-13-jaehriges-maedchen30-stunden-lang-von-migranten-entfuehrt-und-vergewaltigt-a1299783.html

[14] Max Walden, Fears of growing far right in Australia amid ‘Deplorables’ tour, published in Aljazeera website, 13 December 2018, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/12/fears-growing-australia-deplorables-tour-181212191213690.html

[15] Christine Piper, Japanese internment a dark chapter of Australian history, published in The Sydney Morning Herald website, 14 August 2014, https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/japanese-internment-a-dark-chapter-ofaustralian-history-20140813-103ldy.html

[16] Trotskyist Platform, Massively Increase Public Housing! Socialistic China is Doing That So Let’s Fight for the Same Here, 5 June 2012, published in Trotskyist Platform website, https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/massively-increase-public-housing-socialistic-china-is-doing-that-so-lets-fight-for-the-same-here/

[17] Trotskyist Platform, China Is Cracking Down on Corporate Greed & Corruption – When Will That Start to Happen Here?, 15 April 2010, published in Trotskyist Platform website, https://trotskyistplatform.com/Cracking. pdf

[18] Trotskyist Platform, Billionaire James Packer’s High Flying Executives Jailed by China for Corruption, 10 July 2017, published in Trotskyist Platform website, https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/billionaire-james-packers-high-flying-executives-jailed-by-china-for-corruption/

[19] Keir Reeves, Hargreaves discovers gold at Ophir: Australia’s ‘golden age’, from Turning points in Australian history (edited by Martin Crotty and David Andrew Roberts), University of New South Wales Press Ltd., 2009.

[20] International Labour Organization, Global Wage Report 2018/19, 2018, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/ public/—dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/documents/publication/wcms_650553.pdf

[21] Global Legal Insights, Employment and Labour Law- China, Worker consultation, trade union and industrial action, 2019,
https://www.globallegalinsights.com/practice-areas/employment-and-labour-laws-and-regulations/china

[22] Kirsten Tatlow, Back in China, Bus Driver Doesn’t Regret Singapore Strike, published in New York Times (China edition) website, 2 April 2013, https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20130402/c02bus/en-us

Media Coverage of the Sydney Stabbing Attack and the New Cold War Against Red China

MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE SYDNEY STABBING ATTACK AND THE NEW COLD WAR AGAINST RED CHINA

22 August 2019 – A day cannot go by without the Australian ruling class ratcheting up its Cold War against socialistic China. Today, the right-wing NSW government expelled the China-connected Chinese language institute, the Confucius Institutes program, from teaching at NSW schools. The decision was welcomed by ruling class politicians of all stripes. Rabid anti-China Greens MP, David Shoebridge, hailed the decision saying: “I am glad to see the department is cancelling this arrangement, it is unfortunate they can’t cancel it immediately.”

But perhaps the biggest indication of how rabid the Cold War witch-hunt of supporters of Red China is becoming can be seen in the media coverage of a seemingly unrelated event: last week’s stabbing rampage in the centre of Sydney. We know that a 24 year-old woman was stabbed to death by the attacker and a 41 year-old woman was injured after being stabbed in the back. The name of the young woman who was killed is Michaela Dunn. A former student at the University of Notre Dame, Michaela loved to travel the world. We express our deepest sympathies to her friends and family. Her mother described her as a “beautiful, loving woman.” She was much loved by her friends too who described her as “incredible”, a “true delight” and a “bright young woman.” Outrageously, much of the media only focused on Michaela’s occupation as a sex worker rather than as a whole person – thus adding to the widespread stigmatisation and dehumanising of women who work as sex workers.

But what of the woman who was stabbed but not killed? Media footage showed the woman as she was about to be taken away in an ambulance. It was apparent that she was a woman of East Asian background. However, the media revealed almost nothing about her. Later they said that her name was Linda Bo. What the mainstream Australian media hid from the public is that Linda Bo is a Chinese national – that is, a person not only of Chinese ethnicity but a citizen of the PRC (Peoples Republic of China).

Everyone deserves an ideal and a fantastic sex life and on line cialis http://djpaulkom.tv/photos-shockfest-tour-comes-to-an-end-fans-caught-it-all-on-camera/ (Tadalafil) can help you achieve or maintain erection during intercourse. Because of the wonder Goji fruit is known to order cialis have speculative effects on health. Candles have probably best tadalafil been around for as long. These are the following: Headaches Muscle pain Giddiness A rigid or runny nasal area Puffiness across the face region.Above mentioned negative effects are short lived however it persists for a commander viagra http://djpaulkom.tv/hilarious-mixes/ long time then, it requires serious medical attention.

This was definitely not just an oversight by the media. In dealing with other crimes they invariably report if either the suspects or the victims are nationals of another country. Moreover, Chinese state media within hours published that the Consulate General of China in Sydney confirmed that the woman who was injured in the attack was a Chinese national (see for example: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-08/13/c_138306442.htm). And we know that the Australian mainstream media assiduously follow official Chinese media if only to disparage it.

So why did Australia’s capitalist media hide from the public that one of the stabbing victims was a Chinese national? Because to do so would have humanised people from the PRC! As part of whipping up hostility against socialistic China, the Australian government and big business media portray citizens of the PRC as brainwashed, interfering, undemocratic stooges of the Communist Party of China. To then report that a PRC citizen has been the victim of a prominent crime undermines that narrative as crime reporting so often emphasizes the common human interest aspect in stories about victims of crime (unless they happen to be sex workers!) and to portray a citizen of the PRC as a human being with family, friends, feelings and dreams just like everyone else doesn’t fit the picture of China that the mainstream media is now so focussed on drawing. The only PRC citizens who are treated like humans by the media are anti-communist activists who are, of course, lionised by the capitalist media as “brave fighters for democracy.”

It is not that there was any conspiracy involved here. The media did not all get together to secretly decide that they would not report that one of the stabbing victims was a PRC citizen. In fact, it was something even worse. All these mainstream media outlets, acting in the class interests of their capitalist owners, each independently decided to hide this fact from the Australian public. That’s how full on the Cold War campaign is against Red China and against anyone who supports – or does not oppose – it. In the face of this massive media propaganda campaign and the wide array of forces lined up behind the Cold War anti-PRC drive, those truly committed to the struggle for socialism must not flinch one bit. We must stand firm and not only take the correct position on paper in defence of the Chinese workers state (as weakened and deformed as it is by a degree of capitalist intrusion) but we need to actively fight for this line on the streets.

夹杂着白澳种族主义的冷战政治迫害死灰复燃

夹杂着白澳种族主义的
冷战政治迫害死灰复燃

2019年2 月–七个月前, 澳大利亚政府批准了一位加拿大白人至上主义者的签证, Lauren Southern 来澳进行演讲之旅。 Southern 叫嚣着要对亚非国家来的人关上国门。 2017年底, 政府还允许种族主义挑衅者Milo Yiannopoulos访澳。 Yiannopoulos 利用这次旅行诋毁土著居民创造的艺术品, 说它们 “真的像臭屎”。 然而, 虽然政府允许像Southern, Yiannopoulos 这样的人入澳, 但在几周前, 他们却禁止澳中商人黄向墨先生 再次进入澳大利亚。与澳洲政府允许进入的极右翼人士不同的是, 黄先生 并没有煽动种族仇恨。事实上, 他一直参与族群团结的活动。那么为什么黄先生受到了比这些种族分裂的传播者还糟糕的待遇?

那么为什么莫里森政府–工党没有发声- 取消了一个没有犯刑事罪的人的永久居留权呢? 这是因为黄先生发表了赞同中华人民共和国 (中国) 的声明。  澳洲安全情报组织这个间谍机构以他过去曾领导的澳大利亚中国和平统一促进会–一个与北京在台湾、香港和西藏问题上的持相同观点的团体–作为下令取消黄的居留权主要根据,。媒体对黄做了不能令人信服的指陈, 说黄利用大量的政治捐款推动了这一 亲中政治议题。即使这是真的…..。那又怎样!对北京的政治立场表示赞同并不违法,持那些观点的人士进行政治捐赠也不违法。以他们提倡红色中国的立场为由剥夺永久居民的居留权,是对民权的一个无耻的攻击。  政府的决定就像是在告诉大家对一个社会主义国家表示赞同或同情的人不应该被赋予其他居民的权利。 右翼政客和主流媒体在捍卫极端种族主义分子的 权利以煽动对种族和宗教少数群体的仇恨时, 将永远呼吁保护言论自由然而他们要遏制涉及到赞同或同情对中华人民共和国自由言论!

现在我们对作为一个亿万富翁资本家的黄几乎不敢兴趣。 然而, 黄肯定不会因为是资本家而受到澳大利亚统治阶级的攻击。 远不是这样! 黄受到迫害的原因正相反–因为出于他自己的原因, 他选择表达对一个社会主义国家的某些目标的赞同或同情。因此我们也一起说出我们的诉求, 要求政府恢复黄被取消的永久居留权。

大家应该意识到, 如果他们能如此明目张胆地践踏一个与政治精英有如此关系的人的权利, 那么他们会怎么对付我们那些谈论支持中国的只是工薪阶层的中国同胞呢?而且, 澳大利亚政府对黄采取行动的时机似乎是有恐吓的动机。剥夺他的永久居民签证是在社区庆祝农历新年的时候宣布的!

事实上, 撤销黄的居留权是统治阶级对澳大利亚华人中亲中群体不断升级的政治迫害事件。澳大利亚媒体在对黄的迫害事件中, 受到遭泄露的提供给ASIO(澳大利亚安全情报机构)和澳大利亚联邦警察 (AFP) 中匿名人士的报告的刺激。 说到 “暗地里施加影响”! 他们引用ASIO影子间谍等人的有关亲中的华人通过“污蔑”来使反华势力“的声音被压制”。对于 ASIO 间谍而言,抱怨 “声音被压制”虚伪到极点的事情 这是一个恐怖的组织, 有利用渗透和破坏来颠覆左派持不同政见者、土著活动家和其他进步团体和反种族主义势力者的活动的历史

针对亲中华人民共和国的学生

抨击华人社区的主要目标是来自中国的亲中国留学生。政府官员们几乎不加掩饰地威胁中国学生不要传播宣传或 “盲目谴责” 那些抨击中国的人。可笑的是, 他们对中国学生的抨击是以维护澳大利亚所谓的 “开放和言论自由” 的名义进行的 — 要么中国学生不应该对中国说任何积极的话, 要么暴露了那些反华舆论攻势论点中缺陷。

令人担忧的是, 针对亲华学生的运动开始从谴责转向镇压。澳洲国立大学教授 Geremie Barme进行了几乎不加掩饰的呼吁, 要求国立大学 学生雷希英(音译)面对纪律处分。为什么?因为雷制作了一系列被人疯传的热情支持红色中国的视频。想想雷似乎被追猎的待遇与国家党参议员Barry O’Sullivan从他卑劣言论中轻描淡写地脱身相比,两者有天壤之别。两天前,参议员评论到:“一些可恶的中国佬从他们的底裤前面带来他们喜爱的肉肠,违反了我们的生物安全条规”。对于这种种族主义的诽谤, 这位参议员只受到了首相的温和指责。与此相反, 当年轻的学生雷制作本分的、支持社会主义的视频时, 教授们却呼吁对他进行制裁。 与此同时, 一系列严厉的 “外来干涉法” 现在正在生效。 大家都知道, 这些法律是针对中国支持者的。这些法律可能被用来监禁那些主张北京政治立场的人。如果澳大利亚目前的进程不被抵制, 一些中国社区组织和学生团体的领导人今后很可能面临刑事起诉。

新麦卡锡主义的开始和白澳种族主义的复燃

统治阶级反对亲中华人的运动肯定有种族主义的一方面。这是一种类似于种族主义土澳分子的说法, “我们让你进入这个国家, The wholesale cialis price seeds of drumstick help to eradicate intestinal worms. If the problem is led to by diseases like urethritis, seminal vesiculitis, or prostatitis, you can choose herbal medicine Diuretic and Anti-inflammatory http://djpaulkom.tv/video-dj-paul-and-gangsta-boo-talk-new-mixtape-the-devil-and-more-with-power-105s-the-breakfast-club/ viagra prescription free Pill to cure the disease. Men with ED online viagra prescription often feel depressed and do not enjoy their sexual life. Kamagra tablets, usa cheap viagra , cialis etc. are some of the various kinds of the pouches which you can get when you go out globally to buy packets. 所以你至少可以做的是……”[闭嘴, 远离政治!] “接下来, 还有哪些少数族群将成为他们的目标, 因为他们表达了澳大利亚政权认为不遵从他们规定的 “澳大利亚价值观” 的观点 — 抗议华盛顿和堪培拉在委内瑞拉煽动右翼政变努力的拉美裔人士?

澳大利亚政府试图剥夺华人社区中一大部分人应和其他人一样正享有的政治权利的行为与澳大利亚政府给北领地土著人制定的歧视性法律一样, 被相同的白人至上主义方式玷污了。现在,肯定不止是北领地地区,澳大利亚的某些其他地区一样因为这些歧视性的法律使他们无法获得与其他公民相同的社会福利。同时, 主流媒体对亲中社区组织和学生的政治迫害, 与他们对穆斯林和非洲族群的种族主义污蔑是分不开的。

然而, 种族主义并不是这里的唯一因素。毕竟, 如果一个香港背景的亲帝国主义人士表示反对香港重新回归中国, 他的居留资格会被取消吗?没有可能!你看, 试图压制华人社区亲中的群体不仅是种族歧视, 而且是反共。这是澳大利亚政权试图压制任何捍卫社会主义中国或任何其他工人国家而发表的言论。现在, 黄先生作为一个资本主义商人几乎不可能是共产主义者。然而, 即使是黄和前工党 参议员萨姆·达斯特亚里这样的人士也可能受到迫害, 这表明了真正左派今天面临的危险。事实上, 他们因对中国共产党表现出最轻微的 “亲昵” 而受害的方式, 让人想起了20世纪40年代末和50年代澳洲和美国发生的冷战政治迫害 (在那里被称为麦卡锡主义)。那时, 任何对当时最强大的社会主义国家–苏联–不够不满的人, 或者与当地共产党的人有任何联系的人, 都会被贴上卖国贼的标签, 被赶出工作岗位或入狱。

有一个因素使正在出现的冷战政治迫害可能比其早期版本更加危险。这就是反华种族主义在今天新的麦卡锡主义中起着更大作用。对红色中国的反共敌意和白澳种族主义的结合, 已经导致针对中国背景居民的种族主义暴力激增。2 0 1 7年 1 0月, 3名中国高中生在堪培拉公交站遭到种族主义分子的人身攻击。在这之前两个月, 澳洲国立大学 的一名白人至上主义学生在上课时掏出一个棒球棒, 殴打并试图杀死他的中国裔助教和另外四名中国学生。

澳大利亚正在出现的冷战政治迫害开始扩大, 已经不仅仅针对中国的支持者。这一点在澳大利亚亲朝鲜的社会主义政治犯Chan Han Choi的案件中很为明显。在过去14个月中, 他被无耻地拒绝保释, 部分原因是他是朝鲜支持者, 对此,检方声称这意味着他对澳大利亚没有忠诚。因此, 就像诽谤亲华学生一样, 又发生了人们因赞同或同情社会主义国家而被剥夺权利的案件。

抵制对亲中华人社区的攻击!抵制新麦卡锡主义!

今天, 华人社区中的亲华群体不仅面临着重新兴起的针对这个国家所有有色人的白澳种族主义, 而且还面临着在正在出现的新冷战时期对社会主义中国支持者的政治迫害环境下的特意污蔑。这需要通过大规模动员群众,走上街头来抵制。然而, 这不仅是华人社区的任务, 也是澳大利亚整个左翼和工人阶级运动的任务。因为澳大利亚政府对华人社区中很大一部分人的攻击是对所有工人阶级的攻击。首先, 政府煽动的种族主义, 分化工人阶级从而削弱了我们团结起来为我们的权利而战的能力。其次, 对红色中国支持者的迫害很可能变成对工会会员和左派的更广泛的政治迫害。第三, 美澳对中华人民共和国帝国主义式的打击是不符合工人阶级利益的。尽管北京政府已经允许了太多的对中国的资本入侵, 但中国仍然是一个工人国家, 在那里所有关键部门都归公有。这对世界上所有必须得到保护的工人和被压迫者来说是巨大的财富。和中华人民共和国一条阵线,保卫并加强中国的社会主义制度!

反抗对亲中华人社区的种族主义、扣赤色分子帽子式的政治迫害!反对澳大利亚政府对土著居民、穆斯林、非洲裔青年和难民的所有种族主义攻击!捍卫中华人民共和国的支持者表达我们的观点的权利! 为营救澳州政治犯社会主义者Chan Han Choi而斗争!抵制对左派进行新的冷战政治迫害的黑流!

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns … Mixed With White Australia Racism

From Labelling Chinese Students as Communist “Spies” to
Persecuting a Socialist Political Prisoner:

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns
… Mixed With White Australia Racism

21 February 2019 – Seven months ago, the Australian government granted a visa for Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to come here on a speaking tour. Southern calls to keep out people from Asia and Africa, ridiculously claiming that immigration leads to “white genocide.” In late 2017, the government also allowed racist provocateur, Milo Yiannopoulos, to tour. A misogynist who calls for women to be banned from driving, Yiannopoulos used this tour to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Emboldened by his rants, neo-Nazi groups unleashed violent assaults against the African community living in the Kensington suburb where his Melbourne event was held. Yet while the government has allowed the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos to enter, two weeks ago they banned Chinese-Australian businessman, Huang Xiangmo, from re-entering Australia. Unlike the far-right figures that the Australian regime have allowed in, Mr Huang, has not been inciting racial hatred. In fact, he has been involved in events supporting racial unity. Moreover, while the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos have no residency status here, Huang is actually a permanent resident of Australia – one whose wife and son live here. So why is Mr Huang being treated much worse than purveyors of racial division have been?

For the Australian government to revoke the permanent residency of a person who has committed no criminal offence is not only highly unusual: it is, perhaps, completely unprecedented. So why has the Morrison government – with the ALP’s acquiescence – banned Huang? It is because he has made statements sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). The ASIO spy agency cited his past leadership of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Re-unification of China – a group that shares Beijing’s views on the Taiwan, Hong Kong and Tibet issues – as one of the main reasons why it ordered the cancellation of Huang’s residency. The media claim that Huang has used large political donations to push this pro-PRC agenda. Even if that were actually true – and it is far more likely that Mr Huang’s donations are merely yet another case of wealthy businessmen protecting their interests by currying favour with politicians – then so what! It is not illegal to express sympathy for political positions held by Beijing and it is not illegal for people who hold those views to make political donations. To strip a person of permanent residency based on their advocacy for positions held by Red China is an outrageous attack on democratic rights. The decision amounts to asserting that a person who expresses sympathy for a socialistic country should not be accorded the rights of other residents. Right-wing politicians and the mainstream media will speak forever about protecting “freedom of speech” when they defend the “right” of extreme racists to whip up hatred against racial and religious minorities. Yet they want to curb any “free speech” that involves sympathy for the Peoples Republic of China! There is another irony to this saga. The PRC is, by far, Australia’s largest source of export income.  Yet, while the ruling class is happy to make a fortune selling goods to the PRC they are determined to stop anyone saying anything positive about her! 

Now as a billionaire businessman Huang Xiangmo is hardly our cup of tea. All capitalist businessmen – including Mr Huang – are the class enemies of working class people. However, Huang is certainly not being attacked by the Australian ruling class because he is a capitalist exploiter (or else it would be the likes of Andrew Forest, Gina Rinehart and Clive Palmer who would have had their rights stripped long ago). Far from it! Mr Huang is being persecuted, in fact, in the opposite way – because for his own reasons he has chosen to express sympathy for certain goals of a socialistic country. In short, he is being attacked for the wrong reasons by the wrong people. Therefore, we add our voice to those demanding that Huang Xiangmo’s cancelled permanent residency be immediately restored.

While welcoming prominent overseas racists like Milo Yiannopoulos and Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to enter Australia and spread their racist filth, in February the Australian government banned permanent resident Huang Xiangmo from re-entering Australia because of his participation in groups sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China. Above: Huang Xiangmo at an October 2017 gala event of the Australian Council for Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China, which he then headed, to commemorate the 42nd anniversary of the implementation of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act. The Sydney event which united 2,000 people from different races featured performers from more than thirty different ethnicities including from Indian, Korean, Arabic, European and Chinese backgrounds. A month after this event organised by Huang Xiangmo’s group, despicable Milo Yiannopoulos was allowed to enter Australia for a speaking tour which he used to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Below: Milo Yiannopoulos enters a speaking event at parliament house where he gave encouragement to this country’s most extreme racist politicians. Waiting to listen are One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts in the front row, fascist Fraser Anning in the second row on the left and bigoted Nationals MP George Christensen elsewhere in the audience.

Of course, the government knows that the masses – for good reason – dislike billionaires. That is why it is convenient for them to ratchet up their attacks on pro-PRC Chinese people by targeting a person like Mr Huang. Yet what others should realise is that if they can so blatantly trample on the rights of a person with such connections to the political elite then what are they going to do to working class people of Chinese background who speak positively about the PRC? The Australian regime’s timing of their move against Huang seems to be designed to intimidate. The ripping up of his permanent resident’s visa was announced right when the community were marking New Year’s Day! The message has not been lost on the community who to their credit have refused to take this attack lying down. There is a small anti-communist part of the Chinese community who hate the PRC because their landlord/capitalist ancestors were deposed from their tyrannical domination of China by the 1949 Revolution or because they are linked to the capitalist classes who still rule Taiwan and Hong Kong and these people celebrated the attack on Huang. However, 128 Chinese community organisations signed a statement declaring that, “What happened to Mr Huang Xiangmo today may happen to any of us tomorrow.” The statement rightly insisted that:

“The unfair treatment suffered by Mr Huang has dealt a heavy blow to the legitimate political participation of people from Chinese or other ethnic minorities. It made the underprivileged people from the Chinese community and other ethnic minorities even more vulnerable.”

Indeed, the revoking of Mr Huang’s residency is but the latest event in the ruling class’ escalating witch-hunt against the large, pro-PRC portion of Australia’s Chinese community. Mainstream media are running hysterical articles condemning local Chinese organisations, student groups and Chinese-language media for supposedly “threatening Australian sovereignty” by “covertly exerting influence” as proxies of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Ironically, the media group spearheading the claim that most of Australia’s Chinese media are not independent and, instead, are covertly controlled by Beijing is the itself not at all independent ABC which is owned and thus controlled by the Australian capitalist state! Not surprisingly, the ABC’s board of directors is dominated by corporate bigwigs and heads of business associations. The ABC and other media have, as in the persecution of Mr Huang, been spurred on by leaked statements from anonymous figures in ASIO and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as “senior diplomatic figures.” Talk about “covertly exerting influence”! Shadowy ASIO spies and others are quoted complaining about pro-PRC Chinese “silencing” anti-PRC forces through “vilification.” For ASIO spies to complain about “voices being silenced” is the height of hypocrisy.  This is a feared organisation with a history of using infiltration and sabotage to disrupt the activities of leftist dissidents, Aboriginal rights activists and other progressive and anti-racist forces.

Pro-PRC Students Targeted

The main target of attacks on the Chinese community have been pro-PRC international students from China. They have not only been slandered by the media but have faced attacks from the likes of, now former, foreign minister Julie Bishop and Australia’s highest-ranked foreign affairs bureaucrat, Frances Adamson. These officials have made thinly veiled threats warning Chinese students not to spread propaganda or “blindly condemn” those within university circles who attack the PRC. Laughably, their attacks on Chinese students have been made in the name of upholding Australia’s supposed “openness and freedom of speech.” Except that Chinese students are not supposed to say anything positive about the PRC or to expose the flaws in the arguments of anti-PRC crusaders.

Worryingly, the campaign against pro-PRC students is starting to move from denunciations to repression. ANU Professor, Geremie Barme, made a thinly veiled call for ANU student, Lei Xiying, to face disciplinary action. Why? Because Lei made a series of passionately pro-Red China videos that went viral. Consider the difference with the way Lei has been hounded with how lightly Nationals senator Barry O’Sullivan has gotten off for his despicable comment two days ago about “us having a biosecurity breach from some bloody old Chinaman that brings in his favourite sausage down the front of his undies.” Meanwhile, a package of draconian “foreign interference laws” are now going into force that everyone knows are aimed at supporters of China. The laws could be used to jail those who advocate political positions held by Beijing. If Australia’s current course is not resisted, some leaders of Chinese community organisations and student groups could well face criminal prosecution in the future.

The Beginning of a New McCarthyism and
the Resurgence of White Australia Racism

There definitely is a racist aspect to the ruling class campaign against pro-PRC Chinese people. It is an expression of the refrain of racist rednecks that “we let you into the country so the least you could do is … [shut up and stay out of politics!]” It amounts to making people of Chinese background second-class citizens. Which other ethnic minority will next be targeted for expressing a view that the Australian regime deems to not adhere to what they decree to be “Australian values”? Palestinian community members who campaign for the liberation of Palestine? People from Latin American backgrounds who protest against Washington and Canberra’s efforts to incite a right-wing coup in Venezuela?

The Australian government’s attempts to deny a big part of the Chinese community the political rights formally accorded to others is stained with the same white supremacist methodology as the discriminatory laws it has placed on Aboriginal people in the NT – and now certain other parts of Australia – that prevent them having the same access to social welfare as other citizens. Moreover, the mainstream media’s witch-hunting of Chinese community organisations and PRC international students cannot be separated from their racist vilification of the Muslim community and African youth. Similarly, the Australian regime’s demonisation of Huang Xiangmo and their cancellation of his visa has parallels to the way that Peter Dutton brands refugees as “rapists”; and to the way that both the Liberals and ALP insist on denying these persecuted refugees residency in Australia.

However, racism is not the only factor here. After all would a pro-imperialist person of Hong Kong background have his residency cancelled if he expressed opposition to Hong Kong’s re-integration into China? Not a chance! The attempts to silence the pro-PRC part of the Chinese community is not only racist, it is anti-communist. It is an attempt by the Australian regime to gag any voice speaking in defence of socialistic China or any other workers state. Now Mr Huang, as a capitalist businessman is hardly a communist. Rather, knowing that the right to capitalist exploitation is not guaranteed in Red China – a reality that is good for China’s masses – Huang and some other Chinese capitalists seek to stave off their businesses from being nationalised by trying to ingratiate themselves with the CPC. Similarly, former Labor senator Sam Dastyari, who was unfairly witch-hunted out of politics for having once made the patently true statement that the South China Sea issue is China’s internal affair, is no revolutionary. Yet, that even Huang and Dastyari could be persecuted shows the dangers that actual leftists and supporters of the PRC workers state face today. Indeed the way that they were victimised for the slightest displays of “softness” on the CPC is reminiscent of the Cold War witch-hunt in late-1940s and 1950s Australia and the U.S. (where it became known as McCarthyism). Back then anyone not critical enough of the then most powerful socialistic state – the USSR – or who had any They suffer in silence and follow cialis samples the point to ‘keep quiet and carry on’. Suffering from erectile dysfunction once or twice is 25mg barato viagra bad enough that they are suffering from this disease in private now they have to discuss it with people and explain what’s wrong with them. For instance, 10 mg tablets of Lipitor for a 30 day supply may cost you $80 or more in America but only $40 or viagra fast less in Canada. How does it work? This is cialis viagra canada a common question heard from people across the world. connection with people in the local communist parties was branded a traitor and driven out of their job. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia (CPA) leaders were jailed alongside communist trade unionists. In a witch-hunting atmosphere that almost saw the CPA banned in 1951, the government even raided CPA offices. 

Is this what is going to happen again? Ten screenwriters and directors in the U.S. and their families protest their impending imprisonment. The people, who became known as the Hollywood 10, were jailed by the American regime in 1948 for up to a year for refusing to answer questions about their possible communist sympathies. The late 1940s-1950s anti-communist witch-hunt saw hundreds of Hollywood actors, writers and directors driven out of their jobs and blacklisted. Thousands upon thousands of teachers, wharfies, seamen, university academics and government employees also lost their jobs on the basis of the slightest alleged sign of communist association. Meanwhile, hundreds of communists and alleged communists were jailed. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia leaders were imprisoned alongside communist trade unionists.

Anyone who thinks that such an anti-communist witch-hunt could never happen again because “society has progressed” should look around the world and think again. Less than five years ago, South Korea’s capitalist regime banned the country’s third largest parliamentary party (the Unified Progressive Party) and jailed several of its leaders, because that party was not hostile enough to North Korea. In the Ukraine, Bulgaria, Latvia and Lithuania laws are in force banning people from displaying communist symbols. In the Ukraine, these laws are used to prevent the country’s pro-communist parties from standing in elections. Moreover, in the Australian state’s latest attacks on pro-PRC Chinese, the methods of 1950s McCarthyism are being re-deployed. This is seen in the line spun by ASIO that they knows things about Mr Huang but can’t tell us … because it’s secret so you just have to believe them! This apes FBI director J. Edgar Hoover’s “Loyalty Security Reviews” during the U.S. Cold War witch-hunt where suspected communists were not allowed to know who was accusing them and were often not even told what they were accused of! Meanwhile, the media’s branding of PRC students as “spies for the Communist Party of China,” Canberra’s exclusions of Chinese tech giant Huawei because of “security concerns” and the media’s ritual blaming of China for every cyber hack without any evidence all have more than a whiff of an impending McCarthyite witch-hunt.

There is a factor that makes this impending Cold War witch-hunt potentially more dangerous than its earlier version. That is the fact that the main country targeted by today’s Red Scare is an Asian one (rather than the majority white Soviet Union) and the fact that there is a large diaspora from that country living here. This makes White Australia racism even more a component of today’s new McCarthyism than its earlier variety – all the more so because it dovetails with a period of increasing racist attacks on all people of colour. Already, the combination of anti-communist hostility to Red China and White Australia racism have led to a surge in racist violence against Chinese background residents. In October 2017, three Chinese high-school students were bashed by racists at a Canberra bus stop. Two months before this, a white supremacist student at ANU pulled out a baseball bat during a lesson and beat and tried to kill his tutor of Chinese origin and four other Chinese students. Especially when one knows the post-1788 history of this country – from the Gold Rush anti-Chinese pogroms to the 19th century anti-Chinese laws to the White Australia Policy – it is understandable why some people of Chinese descent are fearful.

The emerging Cold War witch-hunt in Australia is starting to expand beyond targeting supporters of the PRC. This is seen most clearly in the case of Chan Han Choi, a socialist political prisoner in Australia. Choi is facing charges of helping the DPRK to export its produce in violation of cruel UN economic sanctions which if true would only make him a great humanitarian and partisan of socialism. He has outrageously been denied bail over the last 14 months, in part, on the grounds that he is a DPRK supporter, which the prosecution claims means that he has no loyalty to Australia. Thus this is, as with the persecution of Mr Huang and the slandering of pro-PRC students, yet another case of people being denied the rights accorded to others on the basis of their sympathy for a socialistic state.

13 April 2019, Sydney: A placard at the rally in defence of socialist political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi, connects Choi’s imprisonment with the broader emerging new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic states.

The Real Truths About “Democracy” and “Foreign Interference”

Supporters of socialistic states have always faced the threat of repression in capitalist countries. For they embody the greatest fear of capitalist rulers: that the exploited masses will unite to depose them from power. If in many periods, socialists have been able to operate legally in Australia it is only because the ruling class thinks that it is more effective to rule the masses by maintaining a facade of “democracy.” Yet no one should be fooled into thinking that the Australian government democratically represents the needs of the majority. Under this country’s current system it is the big business owners who, through their ownership of the media and their huge resources to fund political parties, pay for political advertising, establish think tanks and hire lobbyists who thoroughly shape political discourse. The whole state machinery – including ASIO, police and bureaucrats – has been created for enforcing the rule of the capitalist exploiters at home and enforcing the superexploitation of the peoples of Australia’s neo-colonies abroad (ASIS the overseas operation’s counterpart of the ASIO organisation that is targeting the pro-PRC Chinese community at home has for example been involved in spying on East Timorese officials during negotiations over the Australian ruling class’ attempts to normalise its plunder of Timorese oil resources). That is why no matter who wins elections, the resulting governments always enable tycoons to leach incredible wealth while overseeing a large amount of homelessness, poor living conditions for so many Aboriginal people and the frequent throwing of large numbers of workers out of their livelihoods at the whim of greedy bosses. Today, these same governments – as well as top bureaucrats and ASIO spies – are warning Chinese students that their political discourse must comply with what they deem to be “Australian values.” However, a state machine that does not govern for the interests of the majority should have no right to determine which values people are supposed to adhere to. So we hope that more people – both citizens and international students – will refuse to be bound by the values decreed by a regime that only governs for the interests of the greedy, big end of town.

The Australian ruling class is actually not even truly wedded to the notions of “free speech” and “democracy” that it claims to be defending against Red China’s influence. To be sure, they do find it easier to rule by maintaining some formalities of “democracy.” Yet when they feel the need to dispense with these – as they did during the late 1940s and early 1950s – they will not hesitate to try and do so. Today, we are again entering such a period. The ruling class is slowly moving away from the norms of “free speech” and “democracy” (all in the name of saving these!) because they are shaken by a crisis of confidence. The Great Recession that struck the capitalist world a decade ago really did damage the self-belief of the capitalist ruling classes of the world. Although Australia did not suffer a recession, Australia’s capitalist rulers know that their economy was only saved by exports to China’s booming, socialistic state-owned enterprises. Meanwhile, capitalist rulers around the world see growing resentment amongst the masses. Although, at the moment, mass disgruntlement has led more to support for far-right forces and only to some degree to a leftist radicalisation, the exploiting classes know that this could quickly change. Moreover, they see a socialistic power in China going from strength to strength – and it terrifies them!  Very immediately, the influence of a socialistic power in the South Pacific is enabling countries like PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu to start to free themselves from Australian imperialist domination.

In this context, the Australian ruling class has an interest in manufacturing a “China threat” and an “agents of Chinese influence” scare. This helps them to “justify” to the public an expensive military build-up aimed against socialistic China and North Korea, aggressive policies against Chinese assistance to South Pacific countries and greater political support to anti-communist movements within the PRC. On the other hand, the Red China scare also enables the Australian regime to defend moves to curb leftist dissent and civil liberties within Australia. Moreover, their vilification of a big chunk of the Chinese community helps them to divert the working class masses that they exploit away from the real source of the masses’ troubles. Although much of their scare-mongering about CPC interference is contrived, to some degree they are also truly concerned about the influence of PRC students in Australia. For example, what happens when the Australian class mates of these students find out that these PRC students, who they know have experienced life in both the PRC and Australia, actually like the PRC and don’t feel repressed there? How will the Australian ruling class be able to justify a hostile policy against its biggest trading partner then? And what if the friends and classmates of some Chinese students even start thinking that China’s socialistic system has certain advantages? Heaven forbid!

Although the Australian ruling class is today hyping up the issue of “foreign interference” they actually have no specific stance on the issue per sé. They are hostile to pro-socialist influence but welcome any foreign interference that serves their capitalist interests. Thus, the ruling class welcomes U.S. interference as they need U.S. power to guarantee their predatory neo-colonial subjugation of South Pacific countries. The Australian state welcomes large numbers of U.S. troops in Darwin, hosts U.S. military bases at several locations and established the U.S. Studies Centre at Sydney University to promote U.S. influence in Australia.

The PRC actually goes out of its way to avoid interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. Even all but the most extreme anti-China hawks in Australia do not claim that the PRC is actually trying to change Australia’s political system. Supposed PRC “interference” is at most aimed at ameliorating Canberra’s hostility to the PRC and at opposing anti-communist Chinese groups exiled in Australia. However, the assumptions behind Beijing’s attempted “non interference” policy is flawed for a couple of key reasons. For one, all countries – and key events within them – inevitably affect other countries whether it is by design or not. On the negative side, for example, the rise of extreme right-wing forces around the globe has definitely encouraged fascist groups within Australia. This is partly through white supremacists here being emboldened by seeing the ascendancy of Trump and far-right parties in the likes of Italy and Austria and partly through Australian speaking tours by interfering far-right bigwigs like Southern and Yiannopoulos. On the other hand, the Aboriginal rights struggle in Australia drew inspiration from the militant black liberation movement in the U.S. and vice versa.

The second problem with Beijing’s policy of “non interference” is that it is premised on the expectation that if the PRC does not interfere in the affairs of capitalist countries, the latter will, in turn, not interfere in China’s internal affairs. However such a reality is not what is happening! Although the PRC genuinely does not seek to threaten the social system in the capitalist countries, the capitalist powers do everything possible to undermine socialistic rule in China. Washington – with Canberra’s support – provides massive financial, media and political support to anti-communist groups within China from “pro-democracy” neo-liberals to yuppy Hong Kong students sympathetic to British colonialism to a tiny but violent minority within the Uighur community of right-wing anti-communist, religious extremists. That is why the PRC should take the gloves off and abandon the CPC leadership’s failed policy of “non interference.” It should seek to influence events in the capitalist world – not by covert methods – but by openly proclaiming the advantages of the socialist system, by attributing its own economic successes to socialistic public ownership and by supporting the struggles of the working class and oppressed in the capitalist world. A powerful example of the latter was when the PRC, in the early 1970s, twice feted delegations of some of Australia’s leading Aboriginal rights activists (see: http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/images/history/1970s/china/chinadx2.html).

One thing that the rising tensions between the PRC and capitalist Australia have proved is that no matter how much the PRC tries to avoid interfering in the affairs of an imperialist country, she will still face prejudice and accusations of “interference”. That is why, in a sense, the PRC has nothing to lose if it were to start openly and aggressively promoting the socialist cause within countries like Australia. If she did so she would start to win significant sympathy amongst Australia’s working class people. For example, if the Australian masses, angry at the greed of the local banks, heard that the PRC has a sound financial system based on public ownership of all its key banks, they would find that rather attractive. And it would provide badly needed encouragement to their own struggle for socialism.

Resist the Attacks on the Pro-PRC Chinese Community!
Resist the New McCarthyism!

Today, the pro-PRC section of the Chinese community is facing not only the resurgent White Australia racism that is targeting all people of colour in this country but particular vilification in the context of an emerging, new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of the socialistic PRC. This needs to be resisted by mass mobilisations on the streets. However, this is the task of not only the Chinese community but the entire left-wing and working class movement in Australia. For the Australian regime’s attacks on a large section of the Chinese community is an attack on all working class people. For one, the racism that this campaign is inciting divides working class people and thus weakens our ability to unite to fight for our rights. Secondly, the persecution of supporters of Red China could well turn into a broader witch-hunt against trade unionists and leftists. The McCarthyite witch-hunt in the U.S. first began with persecution of supporters of the USSR and then progressed to repression against all communists and eventually targeted people who advocated for social welfare and public health which were seen as communist policies. In Australia, the late 1940s and 1950s Cold War witch-hunt saw the regime first attacking communists and then using that to target all trade union militants. If the Australian ruling class’ current campaign against PRC supporters is not pushed back we can imagine that soon all avowed communists within Australia will face persecution; and later trade union militants and those who advocate policies that are also pursued by Beijing – such as extensive public housing and public ownership of key industries – will be targeted. Thirdly, the U.S. and Australian imperialist drive against the PRC is against the interests of working class people. Although the PRC’s government has allowed too much capitalist intrusion into China, the PRC remains a workers state where all the key sectors are under public ownership. This is a great treasure for all the workers and downtrodden of the world that must be protected.

With the capitalist rulers increasingly insecure, ever more worried about their system’s decay and ever more fearful about the stunning development of socialistic China we will only be able to put an end to racist scapegoating and Cold War-style witch-hunting when we sweep away this capitalist system for good. However, to advance the struggle towards that goal we need to fight right now to resist racist attacks on any victimised community and to oppose all crackdowns on pro-socialist political expression. And our struggle for workers liberation here will surely be stronger if we can ensure that the world’s most populous country continues to remain a workers state.

Fight back against the racist, red-baiting witch-hunt against the pro-PRC Chinese community! Oppose all the Australian regime’s racist attacks on Aboriginal people, Muslims, youth of African descent and refugees! Defend the right of supporters of the PRC to express our views! Resist the drift towards a new Cold War witch-hunt against leftists! Fight to free socialist political prisoner in Australia Chan Han Choi! Stand by the PRC defend and strengthen socialistic rule in China!

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns … Mixed With White Australia Racism

From Labelling Chinese Students as Communist “Spies” to
Persecuting a Socialist Political Prisoner:

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns
… Mixed With White Australia Racism

21 February 2019 – Seven months ago, the Australian government granted a visa for Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to come here on a speaking tour. Southern calls to keep out people from Asia and Africa, ridiculously claiming that immigration leads to “white genocide.” In late 2017, the government also allowed racist provocateur, Milo Yiannopoulos, to tour. A misogynist who calls for women to be banned from driving, Yiannopoulos used this tour to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Emboldened by his rants, neo-Nazi groups unleashed violent assaults against the African community living in the Kensington suburb where his Melbourne event was held. Yet while the government has allowed the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos to enter, two weeks ago they banned Chinese-Australian businessman, Huang Xiangmo, from re-entering Australia. Unlike the far-right figures that the Australian regime have allowed in, Mr Huang, has not been inciting racial hatred. In fact, he has been involved in events supporting racial unity. Moreover, while the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos have no residency status here, Huang is actually a permanent resident of Australia – one whose wife and son live here. So why is Mr Huang being treated much worse than purveyors of racial division have been?

For the Australian government to revoke the permanent residency of a person who has committed no criminal offence is not only highly unusual: it is, perhaps, completely unprecedented. So why has the Morrison government – with the ALP’s acquiescence – banned Huang? It is because he has made statements sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). The ASIO spy agency cited his past leadership of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Re-unification of China – a group that shares Beijing’s views on the Taiwan, Hong Kong and Tibet issues – as one of the main reasons why it ordered the cancellation of Huang’s residency. The media claim that Huang has used large political donations to push this pro-PRC agenda. Even if that were actually true – and it is far more likely that Mr Huang’s donations are merely yet another case of wealthy businessmen protecting their interests by currying favour with politicians – then so what! It is not illegal to express sympathy for political positions held by Beijing and it is not illegal for people who hold those views to make political donations. To strip a person of permanent residency based on their advocacy for positions held by Red China is an outrageous attack on democratic rights. The decision amounts to asserting that a person who expresses sympathy for a socialistic country should not be accorded the rights of other residents. Right-wing politicians and the mainstream media will speak forever about protecting “freedom of speech” when they defend the “right” of extreme racists to whip up hatred against racial and religious minorities. Yet they want to curb any “free speech” that involves sympathy for the Peoples Republic of China! There is another irony to this saga. The PRC is, by far, Australia’s largest source of export income.  Yet, while the ruling class is happy to make a fortune selling goods to the PRC they are determined to stop anyone saying anything positive about her! 

Now as a billionaire businessman Huang Xiangmo is hardly our cup of tea. All capitalist businessmen – including Mr Huang – are the class enemies of working class people. However, Huang is certainly not being attacked by the Australian ruling class because he is a capitalist exploiter (or else it would be the likes of Andrew Forest, Gina Rinehart and Clive Palmer who would have had their rights stripped long ago). Far from it! Mr Huang is being persecuted, in fact, in the opposite way – because for his own reasons he has chosen to express sympathy for certain goals of a socialistic country. In short, he is being attacked for the wrong reasons by the wrong people. Therefore, we add our voice to those demanding that Huang Xiangmo’s cancelled permanent residency be immediately restored.

While welcoming prominent overseas racists like Milo Yiannopoulos and Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to enter Australia and spread their racist filth, in February the Australian government banned permanent resident Huang Xiangmo from re-entering Australia because of his participation in groups sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China. Above: Huang Xiangmo at an October 2017 gala event of the Australian Council for Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China, which he then headed, to commemorate the 42nd anniversary of the implementation of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act. The Sydney event which united 2,000 people from different races featured performers from more than thirty different ethnicities including from Indian, Korean, Arabic, European and Chinese backgrounds. A month after this event organised by Huang Xiangmo’s group, despicable Milo Yiannopoulos was allowed to enter Australia for a speaking tour which he used to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Below: Milo Yiannopoulos enters a speaking event at parliament house where he gave encouragement to this country’s most extreme racist politicians. Waiting to listen are One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts in the front row, fascist Fraser Anning in the second row on the left and bigoted Nationals MP George Christensen elsewhere in the audience.

Of course, the government knows that the masses – for good reason – dislike billionaires. That is why it is convenient for them to ratchet up their attacks on pro-PRC Chinese people by targeting a person like Mr Huang. Yet what others should realise is that if they can so blatantly trample on the rights of a person with such connections to the political elite then what are they going to do to working class people of Chinese background who speak positively about the PRC? The Australian regime’s timing of their move against Huang seems to be designed to intimidate. The ripping up of his permanent resident’s visa was announced right when the community were marking New Year’s Day! The message has not been lost on the community who to their credit have refused to take this attack lying down. There is a small anti-communist part of the Chinese community who hate the PRC because their landlord/capitalist ancestors were deposed from their tyrannical domination of China by the 1949 Revolution or because they are linked to the capitalist classes who still rule Taiwan and Hong Kong and these people celebrated the attack on Huang. However, 128 Chinese community organisations signed a statement declaring that, “What happened to Mr Huang Xiangmo today may happen to any of us tomorrow.” The statement rightly insisted that:

“The unfair treatment suffered by Mr Huang has dealt a heavy blow to the legitimate political participation of people from Chinese or other ethnic minorities. It made the underprivileged people from the Chinese community and other ethnic minorities even more vulnerable.”

Indeed, the revoking of Mr Huang’s residency is but the latest event in the ruling class’ escalating witch-hunt against the large, pro-PRC portion of Australia’s Chinese community. Mainstream media are running hysterical articles condemning local Chinese organisations, student groups and Chinese-language media for supposedly “threatening Australian sovereignty” by “covertly exerting influence” as proxies of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Ironically, the media group spearheading the claim that most of Australia’s Chinese media are not independent and, instead, are covertly controlled by Beijing is the itself not at all independent ABC which is owned and thus controlled by the Australian capitalist state! Not surprisingly, the ABC’s board of directors is dominated by corporate bigwigs and heads of business associations. The ABC and other media have, as in the persecution of Mr Huang, been spurred on by leaked statements from anonymous figures in ASIO and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as “senior diplomatic figures.” Talk about “covertly exerting influence”! Shadowy ASIO spies and others are quoted complaining about pro-PRC Chinese “silencing” anti-PRC forces through “vilification.” For ASIO spies to complain about “voices being silenced” is the height of hypocrisy.  This is a feared organisation with a history of using infiltration and sabotage to disrupt the activities of leftist dissidents, Aboriginal rights activists and other progressive and anti-racist forces.

Pro-PRC Students Targeted

The main target of attacks on the Chinese community have been pro-PRC international students from China. They have not only been slandered by the media but have faced attacks from the likes of, now former, foreign minister Julie Bishop and Australia’s highest-ranked foreign affairs bureaucrat, Frances Adamson. These officials have made thinly veiled threats warning Chinese students not to spread propaganda or “blindly condemn” those within university circles who attack the PRC. Laughably, their attacks on Chinese students have been made in the name of upholding Australia’s supposed “openness and freedom of speech.” Except that Chinese students are not supposed to say anything positive about the PRC or to expose the flaws in the arguments of anti-PRC crusaders.

Worryingly, the campaign against pro-PRC students is starting to move from denunciations to repression. ANU Professor, Geremie Barme, made a thinly veiled call for ANU student, Lei Xiying, to face disciplinary action. Why? Because Lei made a series of passionately pro-Red China videos that went viral. Consider the difference with the way Lei has been hounded with how lightly Nationals senator Barry O’Sullivan has gotten off for his despicable comment two days ago about “us having a biosecurity breach from some bloody old Chinaman that brings in his favourite sausage down the front of his undies.” Meanwhile, a package of draconian “foreign interference laws” are now going into force that everyone knows are aimed at supporters of China. The laws could be used to jail those who advocate political positions held by Beijing. If Australia’s current course is not resisted, some leaders of Chinese community organisations and student groups could well face criminal prosecution in the future.

The Beginning of a New McCarthyism and
the Resurgence of White Australia Racism

There definitely is a racist aspect to the ruling class campaign against pro-PRC Chinese people. It is an expression of the refrain of racist rednecks that “we let you into the country so the least you could do is … [shut up and stay out of politics!]” It amounts to making people of Chinese background second-class citizens. Which other ethnic minority will next be targeted for expressing a view that the Australian regime deems to not adhere to what they decree to be “Australian values”? Palestinian community members who campaign for the liberation of Palestine? People from Latin American backgrounds who protest against Washington and Canberra’s efforts to incite a right-wing coup in Venezuela?

The Australian government’s attempts to deny a big part of the Chinese community the political rights formally accorded to others is stained with the same white supremacist methodology as the discriminatory laws it has placed on Aboriginal people in the NT – and now certain other parts of Australia – that prevent them having the same access to social welfare as other citizens. Moreover, the mainstream media’s witch-hunting of Chinese community organisations and PRC international students cannot be separated from their racist vilification of the Muslim community and African youth. Similarly, the Australian regime’s demonisation of Huang Xiangmo and their cancellation of his visa has parallels to the way that Peter Dutton brands refugees as “rapists”; and to the way that both the Liberals and ALP insist on denying these persecuted refugees residency in Australia.

However, racism is not the only factor here. After all would a pro-imperialist person of Hong Kong background have his residency cancelled if he expressed opposition to Hong Kong’s re-integration into China? Not a chance! The attempts to silence the pro-PRC part of the Chinese community is not only racist, it is anti-communist. It is an attempt by the Australian regime to gag any voice speaking in defence of socialistic China or any other workers state. Now Mr Huang, as a capitalist businessman is hardly a communist. Rather, knowing that the right to capitalist exploitation is not guaranteed in Red China – a reality that is good for China’s masses – Huang and some other Chinese capitalists seek to stave off their businesses from being nationalised by trying to ingratiate themselves with the CPC. Similarly, former Labor senator Sam Dastyari, who was unfairly witch-hunted out of politics for having once made the patently true statement that the South China Sea issue is China’s internal affair, is no revolutionary. Yet, that even Huang and Dastyari could be persecuted shows the dangers that actual leftists and supporters of the PRC workers state face today. Indeed the way that they were victimised for the slightest displays of “softness” on the CPC is reminiscent of the Cold War witch-hunt in late-1940s and 1950s Australia and the U.S. (where it became known as McCarthyism). Back then anyone not critical enough of the then most powerful socialistic state – the USSR – or who had any The other typical terms of this generic drugs the most effective drug to cure men’s erection issues. prices cialis Kamagra is an anti-ED solution that helps with hardening of the erection and maintaining the same for a period of three times each viagra rx online day. For soft viagra tabs urine pH level has close relation to excessive stress. Raising your hormone level with testosterone appalachianmagazine.com buy cialis online may improve your libido and thus erections will improve as well. connection with people in the local communist parties was branded a traitor and driven out of their job. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia (CPA) leaders were jailed alongside communist trade unionists. In a witch-hunting atmosphere that almost saw the CPA banned in 1951, the government even raided CPA offices. 

Is this what is going to happen again? Ten screenwriters and directors in the U.S. and their families protest their impending imprisonment. The people, who became known as the Hollywood 10, were jailed by the American regime in 1948 for up to a year for refusing to answer questions about their possible communist sympathies. The late 1940s-1950s anti-communist witch-hunt saw hundreds of Hollywood actors, writers and directors driven out of their jobs and blacklisted. Thousands upon thousands of teachers, wharfies, seamen, university academics and government employees also lost their jobs on the basis of the slightest alleged sign of communist association. Meanwhile, hundreds of communists and alleged communists were jailed. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia leaders were imprisoned alongside communist trade unionists.

Anyone who thinks that such an anti-communist witch-hunt could never happen again because “society has progressed” should look around the world and think again. Less than five years ago, South Korea’s capitalist regime banned the country’s third largest parliamentary party (the Unified Progressive Party) and jailed several of its leaders, because that party was not hostile enough to North Korea. In the Ukraine, Bulgaria, Latvia and Lithuania laws are in force banning people from displaying communist symbols. In the Ukraine, these laws are used to prevent the country’s pro-communist parties from standing in elections. Moreover, in the Australian state’s latest attacks on pro-PRC Chinese, the methods of 1950s McCarthyism are being re-deployed. This is seen in the line spun by ASIO that they knows things about Mr Huang but can’t tell us … because it’s secret so you just have to believe them! This apes FBI director J. Edgar Hoover’s “Loyalty Security Reviews” during the U.S. Cold War witch-hunt where suspected communists were not allowed to know who was accusing them and were often not even told what they were accused of! Meanwhile, the media’s branding of PRC students as “spies for the Communist Party of China,” Canberra’s exclusions of Chinese tech giant Huawei because of “security concerns” and the media’s ritual blaming of China for every cyber hack without any evidence all have more than a whiff of an impending McCarthyite witch-hunt.

There is a factor that makes this impending Cold War witch-hunt potentially more dangerous than its earlier version. That is the fact that the main country targeted by today’s Red Scare is an Asian one (rather than the majority white Soviet Union) and the fact that there is a large diaspora from that country living here. This makes White Australia racism even more a component of today’s new McCarthyism than its earlier variety – all the more so because it dovetails with a period of increasing racist attacks on all people of colour. Already, the combination of anti-communist hostility to Red China and White Australia racism have led to a surge in racist violence against Chinese background residents. In October 2017, three Chinese high-school students were bashed by racists at a Canberra bus stop. Two months before this, a white supremacist student at ANU pulled out a baseball bat during a lesson and beat and tried to kill his tutor of Chinese origin and four other Chinese students. Especially when one knows the post-1788 history of this country – from the Gold Rush anti-Chinese pogroms to the 19th century anti-Chinese laws to the White Australia Policy – it is understandable why some people of Chinese descent are fearful.

The emerging Cold War witch-hunt in Australia is starting to expand beyond targeting supporters of the PRC. This is seen most clearly in the case of Chan Han Choi, a socialist political prisoner in Australia. Choi is facing charges of helping the DPRK to export its produce in violation of cruel UN economic sanctions which if true would only make him a great humanitarian and partisan of socialism. He has outrageously been denied bail over the last 14 months, in part, on the grounds that he is a DPRK supporter, which the prosecution claims means that he has no loyalty to Australia. Thus this is, as with the persecution of Mr Huang and the slandering of pro-PRC students, yet another case of people being denied the rights accorded to others on the basis of their sympathy for a socialistic state.

13 April 2019, Sydney: A placard at the rally in defence of socialist political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi, connects Choi’s imprisonment with the broader emerging new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic states.

The Real Truths About “Democracy” and “Foreign Interference”

Supporters of socialistic states have always faced the threat of repression in capitalist countries. For they embody the greatest fear of capitalist rulers: that the exploited masses will unite to depose them from power. If in many periods, socialists have been able to operate legally in Australia it is only because the ruling class thinks that it is more effective to rule the masses by maintaining a facade of “democracy.” Yet no one should be fooled into thinking that the Australian government democratically represents the needs of the majority. Under this country’s current system it is the big business owners who, through their ownership of the media and their huge resources to fund political parties, pay for political advertising, establish think tanks and hire lobbyists who thoroughly shape political discourse. The whole state machinery – including ASIO, police and bureaucrats – has been created for enforcing the rule of the capitalist exploiters at home and enforcing the superexploitation of the peoples of Australia’s neo-colonies abroad (ASIS the overseas operation’s counterpart of the ASIO organisation that is targeting the pro-PRC Chinese community at home has for example been involved in spying on East Timorese officials during negotiations over the Australian ruling class’ attempts to normalise its plunder of Timorese oil resources). That is why no matter who wins elections, the resulting governments always enable tycoons to leach incredible wealth while overseeing a large amount of homelessness, poor living conditions for so many Aboriginal people and the frequent throwing of large numbers of workers out of their livelihoods at the whim of greedy bosses. Today, these same governments – as well as top bureaucrats and ASIO spies – are warning Chinese students that their political discourse must comply with what they deem to be “Australian values.” However, a state machine that does not govern for the interests of the majority should have no right to determine which values people are supposed to adhere to. So we hope that more people – both citizens and international students – will refuse to be bound by the values decreed by a regime that only governs for the interests of the greedy, big end of town.

The Australian ruling class is actually not even truly wedded to the notions of “free speech” and “democracy” that it claims to be defending against Red China’s influence. To be sure, they do find it easier to rule by maintaining some formalities of “democracy.” Yet when they feel the need to dispense with these – as they did during the late 1940s and early 1950s – they will not hesitate to try and do so. Today, we are again entering such a period. The ruling class is slowly moving away from the norms of “free speech” and “democracy” (all in the name of saving these!) because they are shaken by a crisis of confidence. The Great Recession that struck the capitalist world a decade ago really did damage the self-belief of the capitalist ruling classes of the world. Although Australia did not suffer a recession, Australia’s capitalist rulers know that their economy was only saved by exports to China’s booming, socialistic state-owned enterprises. Meanwhile, capitalist rulers around the world see growing resentment amongst the masses. Although, at the moment, mass disgruntlement has led more to support for far-right forces and only to some degree to a leftist radicalisation, the exploiting classes know that this could quickly change. Moreover, they see a socialistic power in China going from strength to strength – and it terrifies them!  Very immediately, the influence of a socialistic power in the South Pacific is enabling countries like PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu to start to free themselves from Australian imperialist domination.

In this context, the Australian ruling class has an interest in manufacturing a “China threat” and an “agents of Chinese influence” scare. This helps them to “justify” to the public an expensive military build-up aimed against socialistic China and North Korea, aggressive policies against Chinese assistance to South Pacific countries and greater political support to anti-communist movements within the PRC. On the other hand, the Red China scare also enables the Australian regime to defend moves to curb leftist dissent and civil liberties within Australia. Moreover, their vilification of a big chunk of the Chinese community helps them to divert the working class masses that they exploit away from the real source of the masses’ troubles. Although much of their scare-mongering about CPC interference is contrived, to some degree they are also truly concerned about the influence of PRC students in Australia. For example, what happens when the Australian class mates of these students find out that these PRC students, who they know have experienced life in both the PRC and Australia, actually like the PRC and don’t feel repressed there? How will the Australian ruling class be able to justify a hostile policy against its biggest trading partner then? And what if the friends and classmates of some Chinese students even start thinking that China’s socialistic system has certain advantages? Heaven forbid!

Although the Australian ruling class is today hyping up the issue of “foreign interference” they actually have no specific stance on the issue per sé. They are hostile to pro-socialist influence but welcome any foreign interference that serves their capitalist interests. Thus, the ruling class welcomes U.S. interference as they need U.S. power to guarantee their predatory neo-colonial subjugation of South Pacific countries. The Australian state welcomes large numbers of U.S. troops in Darwin, hosts U.S. military bases at several locations and established the U.S. Studies Centre at Sydney University to promote U.S. influence in Australia.

The PRC actually goes out of its way to avoid interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. Even all but the most extreme anti-China hawks in Australia do not claim that the PRC is actually trying to change Australia’s political system. Supposed PRC “interference” is at most aimed at ameliorating Canberra’s hostility to the PRC and at opposing anti-communist Chinese groups exiled in Australia. However, the assumptions behind Beijing’s attempted “non interference” policy is flawed for a couple of key reasons. For one, all countries – and key events within them – inevitably affect other countries whether it is by design or not. On the negative side, for example, the rise of extreme right-wing forces around the globe has definitely encouraged fascist groups within Australia. This is partly through white supremacists here being emboldened by seeing the ascendancy of Trump and far-right parties in the likes of Italy and Austria and partly through Australian speaking tours by interfering far-right bigwigs like Southern and Yiannopoulos. On the other hand, the Aboriginal rights struggle in Australia drew inspiration from the militant black liberation movement in the U.S. and vice versa.

The second problem with Beijing’s policy of “non interference” is that it is premised on the expectation that if the PRC does not interfere in the affairs of capitalist countries, the latter will, in turn, not interfere in China’s internal affairs. However such a reality is not what is happening! Although the PRC genuinely does not seek to threaten the social system in the capitalist countries, the capitalist powers do everything possible to undermine socialistic rule in China. Washington – with Canberra’s support – provides massive financial, media and political support to anti-communist groups within China from “pro-democracy” neo-liberals to yuppy Hong Kong students sympathetic to British colonialism to a tiny but violent minority within the Uighur community of right-wing anti-communist, religious extremists. That is why the PRC should take the gloves off and abandon the CPC leadership’s failed policy of “non interference.” It should seek to influence events in the capitalist world – not by covert methods – but by openly proclaiming the advantages of the socialist system, by attributing its own economic successes to socialistic public ownership and by supporting the struggles of the working class and oppressed in the capitalist world. A powerful example of the latter was when the PRC, in the early 1970s, twice feted delegations of some of Australia’s leading Aboriginal rights activists (see: http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/images/history/1970s/china/chinadx2.html).

One thing that the rising tensions between the PRC and capitalist Australia have proved is that no matter how much the PRC tries to avoid interfering in the affairs of an imperialist country, she will still face prejudice and accusations of “interference”. That is why, in a sense, the PRC has nothing to lose if it were to start openly and aggressively promoting the socialist cause within countries like Australia. If she did so she would start to win significant sympathy amongst Australia’s working class people. For example, if the Australian masses, angry at the greed of the local banks, heard that the PRC has a sound financial system based on public ownership of all its key banks, they would find that rather attractive. And it would provide badly needed encouragement to their own struggle for socialism.

Resist the Attacks on the Pro-PRC Chinese Community!
Resist the New McCarthyism!

Today, the pro-PRC section of the Chinese community is facing not only the resurgent White Australia racism that is targeting all people of colour in this country but particular vilification in the context of an emerging, new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of the socialistic PRC. This needs to be resisted by mass mobilisations on the streets. However, this is the task of not only the Chinese community but the entire left-wing and working class movement in Australia. For the Australian regime’s attacks on a large section of the Chinese community is an attack on all working class people. For one, the racism that this campaign is inciting divides working class people and thus weakens our ability to unite to fight for our rights. Secondly, the persecution of supporters of Red China could well turn into a broader witch-hunt against trade unionists and leftists. The McCarthyite witch-hunt in the U.S. first began with persecution of supporters of the USSR and then progressed to repression against all communists and eventually targeted people who advocated for social welfare and public health which were seen as communist policies. In Australia, the late 1940s and 1950s Cold War witch-hunt saw the regime first attacking communists and then using that to target all trade union militants. If the Australian ruling class’ current campaign against PRC supporters is not pushed back we can imagine that soon all avowed communists within Australia will face persecution; and later trade union militants and those who advocate policies that are also pursued by Beijing – such as extensive public housing and public ownership of key industries – will be targeted. Thirdly, the U.S. and Australian imperialist drive against the PRC is against the interests of working class people. Although the PRC’s government has allowed too much capitalist intrusion into China, the PRC remains a workers state where all the key sectors are under public ownership. This is a great treasure for all the workers and downtrodden of the world that must be protected.

With the capitalist rulers increasingly insecure, ever more worried about their system’s decay and ever more fearful about the stunning development of socialistic China we will only be able to put an end to racist scapegoating and Cold War-style witch-hunting when we sweep away this capitalist system for good. However, to advance the struggle towards that goal we need to fight right now to resist racist attacks on any victimised community and to oppose all crackdowns on pro-socialist political expression. And our struggle for workers liberation here will surely be stronger if we can ensure that the world’s most populous country continues to remain a workers state.

Fight back against the racist, red-baiting witch-hunt against the pro-PRC Chinese community! Oppose all the Australian regime’s racist attacks on Aboriginal people, Muslims, youth of African descent and refugees! Defend the right of supporters of the PRC to express our views! Resist the drift towards a new Cold War witch-hunt against leftists! Fight to free socialist political prisoner in Australia Chan Han Choi! Stand by the PRC defend and strengthen socialistic rule in China!

Stand with Socialistic North Korea Against U.S./Australian Capitalism’s War Threats

Stand with Socialistic North Korea

Against U.S./Australian Capitalism’s War Threats

15 August 2017 – Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has vowed to join with the U.S. should it wage war on North Korea. U.S. president Donald Trump threatened North Korea with “fire and fury like the world has never seen.” The people of North Korea– the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK) – have responded with brave defiance. Yet they have reason to be worried. Trump really is the cruel madman that he sounds like. He has slandered Mexicans as “rapists”, implemented despicable laws restricting entry of people from Muslim majority countries and created such a racist climate that race-hate attacks in the U.S. have skyrocketed. But Trump is not just your typical, hard-right wing nut job – he also happens to have his finger on the fire button of the most terrifying nuclear arsenal in the world! But the Australian regime backing him all the way is hardly any better. The regime here has overseen racist killings of black people in custody and the torture of imprisoned Aboriginal youth. New revelations last month have detailed the extent to which Australian SAS forces in Afghanistan are killing children and murdering other innocent civilians and then planting guns on them to make them look like enemy combatants. It is these shock troops of the Australian ruling class who would spearhead Australian military involvement in any war on the DPRK.

A glimpse of the horror that the people of the DPRK are threatened with can be seen in Mosul. There, to further their predatory goals, the U.S. and Australian imperialists and other allied powers conducted air strikes in such an indiscriminate manner that in just a four month period between February and June they killed 5,805 civilians according to the respected liberal, monitoring group Airwars. They killed thousands more through excessive artillery barrages and in airstrikes in other parts of Iraq as well as in Syria.

Part of the reason for the U.S. and Australian rulers’ crazed obsession with crushing the DPRK is the fear that other countries currently targeted by imperialism – like Syria, Iran and Venezuela – will be inspired by North Korea’s defiant building of a nuclear deterrent and themselves seek to stand up more to the Western powers.

Libya, 2011: People inspect the aftermath of yet another NATO airstrike that killed many civilians in the Libyan capital, Tripoli. Especially after having seen the terrible death and destruction perpetrated by the imperialists in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, it is rational for North Korea to develop a nuclear deterrent.

 

However, the factors behind Washington and Canberra’s war drive against the DPRK are somewhat different to what’s behind their proxy war against Syria and their repeated invasions of Iraq. Those adventures are mainly about gaining dominance over the Middle East in order to seize control of the world’s oil supplies. However, the source of the U.S., Australian, British, Japanese and South Korean rulers’ enmity to the DPRK runs even deeper than oil: it is a product of the hostility of capitalist rulers to socialism. The fact that the North Korean people have courageously dared to reject capitalism and to, instead, build a system based upon collective ownership of the factories, banks, mines and land provokes fanatical hatred from the capitalist ruling classes. To be sure, the socialistic system in the DPRK is bureaucratically deformed. The intense military pressure that capitalist powers assert against her plus the economic strangulation of sanctions is an immense deforming force upon her. Nevertheless, the imperialist ruling classes cannot stand having any part of the world where they do not have the “freedom” to control markets and exploit labour at will. Moreover, the capitalists are denied this “right” not only in the DPRK but in her neighbour and ally, the world’s most populous country, the Peoples Republic of China. Although the ruling bureaucracy in China has strengthened pro-capitalist forces by ushering in pro-market reforms from the 1980s onwards, the PRC economy continues to be dominated by socialistic state-owned enterprises. That is why, from provocatively sailing warships through her waters to financing anti-communist “dissidents” and NGOs to targeting next-door neighbour, North Korea,, the U.S. and Australian ruling classes are so determined to undermine the state power in China. Although the national-centred leaders of the PRC and DPRK do little to encourage revolutionary class struggle in the capitalist countries, the mere existence of these socialistic states where the working class, in however a deformed way, rules provokes horror among capitalists. The horror that one day the toiling masses in their own countries will overthrow them and take power. That is why the enmity of capitalist powers to North Korea and China is more enduring and more deep-going than their current hostility to those capitalist-run, ex-colonial countries like Syria that refuse to kowtow enough to them. During their 1950-53 war on the DPRK, the U.S., Australian and other allied capitalist powers completely burnt to the ground the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, several times with bombs and napalm. Later, U.S. war criminals boasted of their deeds:

Over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — 20 percent of the population,’ Air Force Gen. Curtis LeMay, head of the Strategic Air Command during the Korean War, told the Office of Air Force History in 1984. Dean Rusk, a supporter of the war and later secretary of state, said the United States bombed

`everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of another.

The Washington Post, 24 March 2015

Lies, Distortions, Distractions and More Lies

In order to mobilise support for the war drive against North Korea, the mainstream Western media have been painting her as, on the one hand, an economic basket case and, simultaneously, as the “most dangerous threat to the world.” Yet it is not North Korea but the U.S. rulers, backed by Australia, who are the ones who have actually dropped atomic bombs on human beings. Meanwhile, the Australian big business or government-owned media have been deviously claiming that the DPRK has threatened to hit Guam with missiles. However, what the DPRK actually said was that if the U.S. and its allies continued to threaten North Korea, the DPRK would respond by launching missiles that would land in waters short of Guam. That’s very different to saying that they would land nuclear missiles on the people of Guam. Having the U.S. provocatively fly nuclear capable bombers from Guam past North Korea and having the U.S., Australian, South Korean and other capitalist militaries stage massive war games within kilometres of her border is an unbearable situation for the DPRK. By raising the possibility of landing missiles in waters just short of Guam, the North Korean people are giving the U.S. a taste of facing a threat within kilometres of their own territory. Moreover, the DPRK’s refusal to abandon its nuclear weapons program makes a great deal of sense. Gaddafi’s Libya gave up its nuclear weapons under a promise to be “rehabilitated” by the Western powers – and look what happened to them! Iraq never had any weapons of mass destruction which made it easier for the U.S. and Australia to invade and kill over a million of her people.

That North Korea – when strangled by such severe sanctions and military encirclement – has been able to advance its nuclear deterrence so quickly has stunned the imperialist rulers. It is a testament to the superiority of the socialist system. As a Trotskyist Platform comrade of Chinese origin put it:

“To master great weaponry is not an advantage of capitalist countries. Our socialist DPRK can master such powerful means in such difficult domestic conditions, which is really inspiring, encouraging and empowering our working classes around the world.”

Indeed, contrary to the media’s portrayal of North Korea’s economy, the DPRK’s socialistic system allowed it to recover from the devastation of the Korean War and, within a couple of decades, build up the second most advanced industrial economy in Asia (after imperialist Japan). However, following the collapse of the Soviet Union which had been the DPRK’s military protector, the embattled North Korea was hit hard as it then had no choice but to greatly increase the proportion of its income spent on defence. A period of serious privation in the country followed in the mid-1990s.

However, since then, partly helped by trade with Red China, the DPRK economy has steadily advanced. Media claims that North Korea is still impoverished (although made less frequently now since it is so ridiculous) are simply lies. This is proven by estimates of the proportion of children who are underweight due to malnourishment given by a noted imperialist agency, the CIA (hardly an organisation sympathetic to North Korea!). The CIA’s figures do not put North Korea within even the forty most impoverished countries in the world. Indeed, strong Western allies like India, PNG, Indonesia and the Philippines have much higher rates of child malnourishment than does North Korea.

Daily life in North Korea.

Stop drinking alcohol and smoking – doing so overnight cialis soft can help decrease your blood pressure. Many a times, they used cialis 100mg to feel reluctant to seek medical help. The condition is popularly known as erectile dysfunction, male cheapest viagra deeprootsmag.org impotence, erection disorders and loss of erections. Garlic contains a strong fixing called allicin that levitra online expands blood stream and moxie.  

Socialistic North Korea, despite the threats she is facing, has produced a warm and friendly society with a relaxed work environment and a rich musical, artistic, cultural, entertainment and sporting life. In contrast, capitalist rule in South Korea has not only led to a large amount of homelessness and poverty amongst the elderly there but also to one of the highest suicide rates in the world. This does not stop the Australian media from making much of the higher per capita income in South Korea. That is a product of, on the one hand, the sanctions and draining military encirclement of the North and, on the other, the fact that from the late 1960s onwards the U.S. provided massive aid to the South when they realised that dissatisfaction with capitalist rule and sympathy for the North amongst the South Korean masses was “threatening” the country with socialist revolution. Yet, today, most South Korean workers lack permanency in their jobs and many are forced to work terribly long hours. This and the cut-throat, dog eat dog nature of the society there has meant that hundreds of North Koreans who defected to the South in search of higher incomes have ended up defecting back to the North!

Not Opposition to Both Sides But Solidarity with the Socialistic DPRK

Turnbull has claimed that he would send Australia to war with North Korea because of the ANZUS treaty with the U.S. However, what is really driving the Australian capitalist regime is that they share the same reasons for wanting to destroy socialistic rule in North Korea – and ultimately China – as their U.S. allies. Indeed, as a capitalist ruling class located in Asia, the Australian rulers’ obsession with crushing Asian socialistic states is if anything more intense than their U.S. counterparts’. It was the Australian Menzies regime that pushed for the U.S. to escalate its anti-communist war in Vietnam in 1965. Indeed, the Australian government even pressured the then U.S.-puppet South Vietnamese government “to request” Australian troops to support it!

Just as it is not only the right-wing Republican Party in the U.S. but also the liberal American capitalists who are charging towards war on North Korea – and ultimately China – it is not only the right-wing Liberal Party that is beating the war drums here. ALP Opposition leader Bill Shorten ranted that it was the “bellicose and provocative actions” of North Korea, and not Trump’s rhetoric, which was of “big concern” adding that:

“I and the government share the same concerns and the same views, and Australians should be reassured that on this matter of North Korea and our national security, the politics of Labor and Liberal are working absolutely together.”

– The Australian, 11 August 2017

The Greens leader, Richard Di Natale, has for his part at least criticised the war drive of the Australian government. However, he has very wrongly put socialistic North Korea in the same category as the Western imperialist rulers:

“Malcolm Turnbull by backing Donald Trump has just put a target on our back.”

“What we’ve got is two dangerous, paranoid and unhinged world leaders goading each other into a conflict which puts the very survival of each and every person on the planet at risk.

Such equating of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un with Donald Trump or Turnbull on the part of supposed opponents of war is very harmful. For, regardless of personalities, these leaders are not the same at all because the systems that they preside over are not at all the same. Today, Trump covered for his fascist backers when he made excuses for these white supremacists after they unleashed racist “fire and fury” in Charlottesville culminating in a murderous terror attack that killed an antiracist protester, Heather Heyer. Meanwhile, like the previous ALP government, the Turnbull regime locks up asylum seekers in hell-hole offshore camps. Turnbull has also re-instituted the union-busting ABCC system against construction workers and attacked the rights of unemployed workers while giving tax cuts to millionaires. Trump, for his part, wants to deny millions more poor people in America access to medical care while giving huge tax cuts to the rich. Both he and Turnbull administer a system that has left large numbers of people homeless. In contrast, while Kim Jong Un may be a “dictator” who rides on a personality cult that is almost as gross as the establishment’s glorification of the British Royal Family, he administers a system that not only ensures zero homelessness in North Korea but also guarantees employment and virtually free housing for all of its people. Furthermore, North Korea’s leaders have never made a predatory intervention into another country. In contrast, the capitalist regimes in the U.S. and Australia have, between themselves over the last thirty years, invaded or otherwise intervened in – and often largely destroyed – Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Serbia, East Timor, Bougainville, Yemen, Somalia, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Panama, Haiti and more! Therefore, what the working class and all opponents of imperialism and capitalism in Australia and the U.S. must do is to stand in solidarity with the DPRK against all the war threats from the imperialist powers.

Unfortunately, much of the Left in Australia is instead tailing the Greens’ line of “neutrality” in the current crisis. Thus, the Hiroshima Day Sydney Committee and the Australian Anti-Bases Campaign Coalition, with the support of the Sydney Stop the War Coalition (coalitions which include among them prominent activists within the Communist Party of Australia as well as the Socialist Alliance, Solidarity and Socialist Alternative groups) have announced a rally for this Saturday in Sydney “to call for negotiations to resolve the crisis on the Korean peninsula.” Such a call steers anti-imperialists and anti-capitalists away from strongly politically opposing the U.S. and Australian military forces arrayed against the DPRK and also pushes them into supporting demands on the DPRK to wind back its nuclear deterrence development and acquiesce to imperialist diktats. It is acting like those small-l liberals who call for “reconciliation” between the Australian rulers and Aboriginal people – as if Aboriginal people should have to compromise with the racist, genocidal ruling class. It is of a piece with a nominal supporter of workers’ rights who, during a conflict between unions and a capitalist boss, argues that “both sides should negotiate not escalate.”

In contrast, Trotskyist Platform is fighting to convince other leftists and supporters of working class interests to not be neutral in the current crisis but to stand resolutely with the socialistic state against the capitalist powers! That means we must stand unconditionally with the socialistic DPRK – and ultimately socialistic China – against the capitalist war threats. We should also welcome the DPRK’s development of a nuclear deterrence capability. What sincere anti-capitalists and anti-imperialists must do is to build actions that demand: End all U.S.-Australian- South Korean war games threatening the DPRK! U.S. troops out of South Korea, Japan and Guam! Close the joint U.S.-Australian military facilities and bases in Pine Gap, Darwin and elsewhere – Down with ANZUS! End all sanctions against the DPRK! Get rid of the U.S.’s THAAD missile defence system in South Korea that targets not only the DPRK but also the PRC!

7 September 2017, Seongju, South Korea: Capitalist South Korea’s notoriously brutal police disperse a demonstration of local residents and activists opposed to the installation of America’s THAAD missile defence weaponry.

Australian Working Class: Let Us Defend the DPRK Like We Should Defend Our Unions!

The fate of the DPRK will be affected much by its much larger and powerful socialistic neighbour, the PRC. The PRC is the DPRK’s only significant ally and over 90% of North Korea’s trade is with China. To a significant degree, the PRC provides protection for the DPRK and certainly its presence has acted as a major deterrent against imperialist attack on the DPRK. However, at the same time the vacillating rulers of Red China, who pursue a futile policy of seeking “co-existence” with capitalist powers, bend to imperialist diktats by publicly condemning DPRK missile and nuclear tests. Nine days ago, China’s leaders treacherously joined the Western imperialists and capitalist Russia in voting for a new round of even more crippling economic sanctions against North Korea. Although it is true that the PRC does try to somewhat limit the damage done by these sanctions and does more to stand by the DPRK militarily than it admits publicly, its public position does matter as it serves to increase diplomatic and political pressure on the DPRK. Any acquiescence to imperialist demands against the DPRK is suicidal for the PRC as it is the PRC itself which is the ultimate target of capitalist moves against its socialistic little sister, North Korea.

The question of what attitude to take towards the DPRK is the subject of intense debate within China. Those pushing for China to move away from solidarity with its socialistic neighbour tend to be the most right-wing elements within China who are simultaneously pushing for greater “rights” for the capitalist private sector and more political “freedom” for pro-capitalist forces. In contrast, those advocating greater PRC solidarity with the socialistic DPRK are also those fighting to preserve and strengthen China’s own socialist foundations. The debate within China over its position on North Korea is a fight over the very soul and direction of China itself. That makes it triply important that politically aware workers and leftists the world over must call for the PRC to stand resolutely behind her socialistic sister, the DPRK. China: Abandon all participation in sanctions against North Korea! Support the DPRK’s nuclear deterrence development instead! Strengthen solidarity between workers states to strengthen China’s own commitment toward socialism! Recall the spirit of the PRC’s heroic support for the DPRK during the 1950-53 Korean War!

Trotskyist Platform is proud that we have been at the forefront of organising every single action in Sydney defending the DPRK workers state over the last seven years. We want to help cohere a layer of activists both inside and outside our group who are both firmly committed to defending the DPRK workers state and who are striving to become very knowledgeable about the question. These activists would then be the core of building actions in solidarity with the DPRK – and also the PRC – in the near future.

We understand that durable solidarity with socialistic states can only be built by appealing to the interests that the working class and its allies have in supporting workers states. To those workers in Australia who currently buy the anti-North Korea propaganda we say: Do you believe the media and politicians when they say that the CFMEU construction workers union are a bunch of thugs who threaten “innocent” people for no reason? Of course not! So why do you then believe these same people when they say that the DPRK is the biggest threat to world peace? Indeed, the attacks on the DPRK and China have much in parallel with the bosses’ attacks on our unions. Except that the capitalist hostility to socialistic states is a lot more fanatical because in those countries the masses have not just organised workers to resist how much the bosses can exploit them… they have actually taken over the whole country. Let us trade unionists and all opponents of capitalist exploitation mobilise in action to oppose both the bosses’ attacks on our unions at home and their attacks on workers states abroad. For unconditional solidarity with the socialistic DPRK!